SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2012 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Indications for Penetrating Keratoplasty, 7 Year Period

Penetran Keratoplasti Endikasyonları, 7 Yıllık Periyot

Osman CENGİZ
Meryem CENGİZ KÖKSAL
Nimet Yeşim ERÇALIK
Bilal ESKİÇIRAK
Banu ACAR TORUN
Suphi ACAR
Pages
153–158
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Keratoconus and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy were the most common indications of PK in our eye bank.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To determine the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. (PK) at Haydarpasa Numune Training and Researching Hospital Eye Bank,İstanbul, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, we reviewed the records of all patients who underwent PKP at Haydarpasa Numune Training and ResearchingHospital's Eye between 2001and 2007.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Keratoconus and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy were the most common indications of PK in our eye bank.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Keratoplasti · penetran · Keratokonus

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. (PK) at Haydarpasa Numune Training and Researching Hospital Eye Bank,İstanbul, Turkey. Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, we reviewed the records of all patients who underwent PKP at Haydarpasa Numune Training and ResearchingHospital's Eye between 2001and 2007. Results: A total of 303 patients (303 eyes) were included in this study. The leading indications for PKP were keratoconus (23.8%), followed by pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (23.4%), corneal scarring secondary to infectious keratitis (17.2%), traumatic corneal scarring (14.9%), corneal dystrophy (7.6%), regrafting (5.3%), aphakic bullous keratopathy (2.6%), band keratopathy (2.3%), and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (1.3%). There was an increasing trend in rates of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, regrafting, and traumatic corneal scarring over the second half of this period. There was no significiant change in the indication rate of keratoconus, corneal scarring secondary to infectious keratitis and corneal dystrophy. Conclusions: Keratoconus and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy were the most common indications of PK in our eye bank.

Özet

Amaç: Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Göz Bankası'nda yapılan Penetran Keratoplasti (PK) ameliyatlarının endikasyonlarının dağılımını yapmak. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde 2001-2007 yılları arasında PK ameliyatı geçiren hastaların muayene kartları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Bulgular: Yapılan çalışmada 303 hastanın 303 gözü çalışmamızda incelendi. En sık PK endikasyonu keratokonustu (%23.8). Diğer en sık endikasyonlar sırasıyla Psödofakik büllöz keratopati (%23.4), infeksiyöz keratite sekonder korneal skar (%17.2), travmatik korneal skar (%14.9), korneal distrofi (%7.6), regreft (%5.3), afakik büllöz keratopati (%2.6), band keratopati (%2.3) ve Fuchs endotelyal distrofi (%1.3) olarak sıralandı. Psödofakik büllöz keratopati, regreft ve travmatik korneal skar oranında çalışmanın ikinci yarısında artan bir trend tespit edildi. Çalışma boyunca keratokonus, infeksiyöz keratite sekonder korneal skar ve korneal stromal distrofi oranında herhangi bir değişiklik izlenmedi. Sonuç: Hastanemiz göz bankasında keratokonus ve psödofakik büllöz keratopati en yaygın PK endikasyonlarını oluşturmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CENGİZ, O., KÖKSAL, M. C., ERÇALIK, N. Y., ESKİÇIRAK, B., TORUN, B. A., ACAR, S. (2012). Indications for Penetrating Keratoplasty, 7 Year Period. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 153–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/215404

References (17)

  1. Thylefors B, Negrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, et al. Global data on blindness. Bull WHO 1995;73:116-21
  2. Sony P, Sharma N, Sen S, et al. Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in Northern India. Cornea 2005;24:989-91
  3. Chen WL, Hu FR, Wang IJ. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Taiwanfrom 1987 to 1999. Cornea 2001;20:141-4
  4. Sugar A, Sugar J. Techniques in penetrating keratoplasty. A quarter century of development. Cornea 2000;9:603-10
  5. Cosar CB, Sridhar MS, Cohen EJ, et al. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 1996-2000. Cornea 2002;21:148-51
  6. Dobbins KRB, Price FW, Whitsom WE. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States. Cornea 2000;19:813-6
  7. Poinard C, Tuppin P, Loty B, et al. The French national waiting list for keratoplasty created in 1999: patient registration, indications, characteristics, andturnover. J Fr Ophtalmol 2003;26:911-9
  8. Thompson RW Jr, Price MO, Bowers PJ, et al. Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1396-402
  9. Chaidaroon W, Ausayakhun S, Ngamtiphakorn S, et al. Clinical indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, 1996-1999. Med Assoc Thai 2003;86:206-11
  10. Edwards M, Clover GM, Brookes N, et al. Indications for corneal transplantation in New Zealand: 1991-1999. Cornea 2002;21:152-5
  11. Legeais JM, Parc C, d’Hermies F, et al. Nineteen years of penetrating keratoplasty in the Hotel-DieuHospital in Paris. Cornea 2001;20:603-6
  12. Mkanganwi N, Nondo SI, Guramatunhu S. Indications for corneal grafting in Zimbabwe. CentAfr J Med 2000;46:300-2 13. Siganos CS, Tsiklis NS, Miltsakakis DG, et al. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Greece, 1982-2006: a multicenter study. Cornea 2010;29:372-4
  13. Li JY, Mannis MJ. Eye banking and the changing trends in contemporary corneal surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2010;50:101-2
  14. Ting DS, Sau CY, Srinivasan S, et al. Changing trends in keratoplasty in the West of Scotland: a 10-year review. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:405-8
  15. Wang JY, Xie LX, Song XS, et al. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Shandong, 2005-2010. Int J Ophthalmol 2011;4:492-7
  16. Ghosheh FR, Cremona FA, Rapuano CJ, et al. Trends in penetrating keratoplasty in the United States 1980-2005. Int Ophthalmol 2008;28:147-53
  17. Keenan TD, Carley F, Yeates D, et al. Trends in corneal graft surgery in the UK. Br J Op