Journals / Flora İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi / 2001 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

The evaluation of chromogenic CPS ID2 medium in the identification of bacterial isolates

Çeşitli bakterileri tanımlamada kromojenik CPS ID2 besiyerinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
189–195
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Except for one group A and one group C streptococci no failure of iso-lation was observed with the media under test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:CPS ID2 is a chromogenic medium defined for the urinary specimens.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The final products with different colours produced by the bacterial enzymatic degradation of the chromogenic substrates within the medium make it possible for bacterial colonies to be identified in terms of colony colour.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Except for one group A and one group C streptococci no failure of iso-lation was observed with the media under test.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mikrobiyolojik teknikler · Kültür ortamı · Enterococcus

Abstract

CPS ID2 is a chromogenic medium defined for the urinary specimens. The final products with different colours produced by the bacterial enzymatic degradation of the chromogenic substrates within the medium make it possible for bacterial colonies to be identified in terms of colony colour. In this study we aimed to evaluate the use of CPS ID2 medium in defining pre-identified, clinical bacterial isolates in terms of the co-lony colour they produce in the media. Suspensions in sterile physiological saline corresponding to a colony count of I08 CFU/mL of bacteriae were prepared with a total of 423 bacterial isolates from various clinical specimens all of which were inoculated to blood agar or EMB and CPS ID2 media. Bacterial identification using colony colour on chromogenic media was compared with the identification made by conventional tests. The quality control of the media was performed using Escherichia coli ATCC 27853 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. A total of 79 (95.2%) E. coli out of 83 created typical pink-dark red coloured colonies whereas 4 (4.8%) grew as transparent without creating any colour. Proteus (n: I I ), Morganella (n: 4), Providencia (n: I) (PMP) produced translucent colonies with a brown hue around. Klebsiella (n: 60), Enterobacter (n: 43), Serratia (n:10) (KES) were recognised as metallic, blue-green, large colonies, also defined as ha-ying a turquoise colour. Yet a small number of tests needed to be planned in order for bacteria included in PMP and KES groups to be defined in species level. All enterococci (n: 55) were readily identified by the small, blue-green, turquoise colonies. In the rest of the bacterial groups colony colour did not provide adequate in-formation for bacterial identification. Except for one group A and one group C streptococci no failure of iso-lation was observed with the media under test.

Özet

CPS 1D2, idrar örneklerinin değerlendirilmesi için önerilen kromojenik bir besiyeridir. Besiyerindeki kromojenik substratların bakterilerin enzimleriyle parçalanması sonucu oluşturduğu farklı renklerdeki son ürünler kolonilerin renklerine göre tanımlanmalarını sağlar. Çalışmamızda, hazır, ticari formda temin edilmiş olan CPS ID2 besiyerinin, laboratuvarımızda daha önceden izole edilmiş farklı bakteri suşlarını tanımlamadaki başarısını değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır. Çeşitli klinik örneklerden izole edilmiş ve tür düzeyinde tanımlanmış 423 suşun, 2 mL serum fizyolojik içerisinde 10 8 CFU/mL bakteri sayısına eşit süspansiyonu, kanlı (Pronadisa) veya EMB (Pronadisa) besiyerleri ile CPS ID2 (BioMerieux) besiyerine ekildi. Kromojenik besiyerinde elde edilen saf kültürler koloni renklerine göre tanımlandı. Renk ile yapılan tanımlama klasik mikrobiyolojik yöntemlerle yapılmış olan tanımlama ile karşılaştırıldı. Escherichia coli ATCC 27853 ve Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 kontrol suşları ile besiyerlerinin kalite kontrolleri yapıldı. Toplam 83 E. coli'nin 79 (%95.2)'u pembe-koyu kırmızı renkte koloniler oluştururken, 4 (%4.8)'ü şeffaf koloniler oluşturdu. Proteus (n:11), Morganella (n: 4), Providencia (n: 1) (PMP)'nın her 3'ü de etrafı kahverenginde şeffaf koloniler oluşturdu. Klebsiella (n: 60), Enterobacter (n: 43), Serratia (n: 10) (KES) türleri oluşturdukları metalik mavi-yeşil, turkuaz rengindeki koloniler ile diğer Enterobacteriaceae üyelerinden ayırt edildi. Ancak gerek PMP gerekse KES gruplarında tür düzeyinde identifikasyon için ek biyokimyasal test yapılması gerektiği görüldü. Tüm enterokoklar (n: 55) mavi-yeşil, turkuaz rengindeki kolonileri ile kolaylıkla tanımlandı. Diğer bakteri gruplarında koloni renginin yeterince ayırt ettirici olmadığı görüldü. Birer adet A ve C grubu streptokok dışında CPS ID2 besiyerinde üremeyen suş olmadı.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKOÇ, A. E., UNCU, H., ÖZIŞIK, A., ACAR, N. (2001). The evaluation of chromogenic CPS ID2 medium in the identification of bacterial isolates. Flora İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 189–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/215372

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Koneman EW, Allen DS, Janda WM, SchreckenbergerPC, Winn WC. Color Atlas and Textbook of DiagnosticMicrobiology. 5thed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williamsand Wilkins, 1997:137-41
  2. Stamm WE, Stapleton AE. Approach to the patient withurinary tract infection. In: Gorbach SL, Barlett JG,Blacklow NR (eds). Infectious Diseases. 2nded. USA:WB Saunders Company, 1998:943-52
  3. Howard BJ, Keiser JF, Smith TF, Weissfeld AS, TiltonRC. Clinical and Pathogenic Microbiology. 2nded. Was-hington: Mosby Inc, 1994:880-7
  4. Merlino J, Sıarakas S, Robertson GJ, et al. Evaluation ofchromagar orientation for differentiation and presumpti-ve identification of gram-negative bacilli and enterococ-cus species. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:1788-93 5. Mazoyer MA, Orenga S, Doleans F, et al. Evaluation ofCPS ID2 medium for detection of urinary tract bacterialisolates in specimens from a rehabilitation center. J ClinMicrobiol 1995;33:1025-7
  5. Hengstler KA, Hammann R, Fahr AM. Evaluation ofBBL chromagar medium for detection and presumptiveidentification of urinary tract pathogens. J Clin Microbi-ol 1997;35:2773-7
  6. Samra Z, Heifetz M, Talmor J, et al. Evaluation of use ofa new chromogenic agar in detection of urinary tract pat-hogens. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:990-4
  7. Ogden ID, Watt AJ. An evaluation of fluorogenic andchromogenic assays for the direct enumeration of Esche-richia coli. Lett Appl Microbiol 1991;13:212-5
  8. Mates A, Shaffer M. Membrane filtration differentiationof E. coli from coliforms in the examination of water. JAppl Bacteriol 1989;67:343-6
  9. Sarhan HR, Foster HA. A rapid flurogenic method forthe detection of Escherichia coli by the production of ß-glucuronidase. J Appl Bacteriol 1991;70:394-400
  10. Kodoca H, Ishikawa M, Iwata M, et al. Evaluation of anew medium with chromogenic substrates for membersof the family Enterobacteriaceae in urine samples. J ClinMicrobiol 1995;33:199-201
  11. Manafi M, Kneifel W, Bascomb S. Fluorogenic and chro-mogenic substrates used in bacterial diagnostics. Micro-biological Reviews 1991;55:335-48
  12. Manafi M, Rotter ML. A new plate medium for rapidpresumptive identification of differentiation of Entero-bacteriaceae. International Journal of Food Microbiology1991;14:127-34
  13. Ralovich B, İbrahim GAM, Fabian A, et al. Beta-D-glucu-ronidase activity of gram negative bacteria. Acta Micro-biol Hungarica 1991;38:283-91
  14. Clarridge JE, Pezzlo MT, Vosti KL. Laboratory diagnosisof urinary tract infections. Cumitech 2A 1987:1-13.