Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1

Factors Affecting Mortality in Patients who Underwent Primary Suture Repair for Peptic Ulcer Perforation

Pages
1–4
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion and Conclusion: Advanced age and postoperative pneumonia were the factors associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients who underwent primary suture for PUP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Primary suture is the most commonly used emergency surgery procedure for peptic ulcer perforation (PUP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In total, 103 patients underwent primary suture for PUP between September 2009 and December 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion and Conclusion: Advanced age and postoperative pneumonia were the factors associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients who underwent primary suture for PUP.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Primary suture is the most commonly used emergency surgery procedure for peptic ulcer perforation (PUP). The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting mortality in patients who underwent primary suture for PUP. Methods: In total, 103 patients underwent primary suture for PUP between September 2009 and December 2016. Patient demographics, comorbidities, the time interval between symptom onset and hospital admission, the length of hospital stay, and morbidity and mortality data were retrospectively collected. Results: The median age of the patients was 63 years (min: 22, max: 99 years) and 74.8% were male. In all, 45 patients had at least 1 comorbidity. The median time interval between symptom onset and hospital admission was 1 day (min: 1, max: 10 days). The mortality rate was 10.7%. Non-surviving patients were older, more frequently presented with shock, and more often had postoperative pneumonia, compared with survivors. Older age (Odds ratio [OR]: 1.22; p=0.0015) and postoperative pneumonia (OR: 84.2; p=0.0031) were independent risk factors associated with increased mortality. Discussion and Conclusion: Advanced age and postoperative pneumonia were the factors associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients who underwent primary suture for PUP.

🔖

Cite This Article

IŞIK, Ö., DÜNDAR, H. Z., BAKAR, B., ÖZKAN, Ö. F., ÖZTÜRK, E., KAYA, E., YILMAZLAR, T. (2018). Factors Affecting Mortality in Patients who Underwent Primary Suture Repair for Peptic Ulcer Perforation. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1, 1–4. https://ajindex.com/articles/214741

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Gökakın AK, Kurt A, Atabey M, Koyuncu A, Topçu O, Aydın C, et al. The impact of Ramadan on peptic ulcer perforation. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2012
  2. 339–43. [CrossRef ] 2. Søreide K, Thorsen K, Harrison EM, Bingener J, Møller MH, Ohene-Yeboah M, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet 2015
  3. 1288–98. [CrossRef ] 3. Wilhelmsen M, Møller MH, Rosenstock S. Surgical complications after open and laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in a nationwide cohort. Br J Surg 2015
  4. Thorsen K, Søreide JA, Kvaløy JT, Glomsaker T, Søreide K. Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality. World J Gastroenterol 2013
  5. 347–54. [CrossRef ] 5. Taş İ, Ülger BV, Önder A, Kapan M, Bozdağ Z. Risk factors influencing morbidity and mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease. Ulus Cerrahi Derg 2014
  6. 20–5. 6. Sanabria A, Villegas MI, Morales Uribe CH. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD004778. [CrossRef ] 7. Møller MH, Shah K, Bendix J, Jensen AG, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Adamsen S, et al. Risk factors in patients surgically treated for peptic ulcer perforation. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009
  7. 145–52. [CrossRef ] 8. Arici C, Dinckan A, Erdogan O, Bozan H, Colak T. Peptic ulcer perforation: an analysis of risk factors. Ulus Travma Derg 2002
  8. 142–6. 9. Møller MH, Adamsen S, Thomsen RW, Møller AM. Preoperative prognostic factors for mortality in peptic ulcer perforation: a systematic review. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010
  9. 785–805. 10. Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, von Meer A, Søreide K, Søreide JA. Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg 2011
  10. 1329–35. 11. Menekse E, Kocer B, Topcu R, Olmez A, Tez M, Kayaalp C. A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. World J Emerg Surg 2015
  11. [CrossRef] 12. Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT. Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg 1987
  12. 22–6. [CrossRef ] 13. Søreide K, Thorsen K, Søreide JA. Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 2014
  13. e51–64. [CrossRef ] 14. Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA, van der Ham AC, van der Harst E, Oei HI, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg 2009