Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Family Satisfaction Level at Erciyes University Medical Faculty Intensive Care Units with a Validated Survey

Pages
264–270
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Even though the general satisfaction level of the patients’ relatives was high, satisfaction level can be increased by improving physical factors, such as the waiting room setting, and by training on the communication skills of all staff that have contact with the patients’ relatives on communication skills.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the FS-ICU 24 survey in the Turkish language, to evaluate the satisfaction of ICU patients’ relatives, and to determine the factors affecting satisfaction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this study, the Turkish version was prepared based on the FS-ICU 24 survey applied to the relatives of ICU patients (Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine, General Surgery and Neurosurgery) at the Erciyes University in the Faculty of Medicine between April 2015 and June 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Even though the general satisfaction level of the patients’ relatives was high, satisfaction level can be increased by improving physical factors, such as the waiting room setting, and by training on the communication skills of all staff that have contact with the patients’ relatives on communication skills.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the FS-ICU 24 survey in the Turkish language, to evaluate the satisfaction of ICU patients’ relatives, and to determine the factors affecting satisfaction. Materials and Methods: In this study, the Turkish version was prepared based on the FS-ICU 24 survey applied to the relatives of ICU patients (Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine, General Surgery and Neurosurgery) at the Erciyes University in the Faculty of Medicine between April 2015 and June 2015. The Turkish version was tested and proven to be reliable and valid. Relatives of patients that were hospitalized for at least 48 hours, who had visited the patient at least once, were included. In this study, 369 surveys were completed. Results: FS-ICU 24 survey was found reliable and valid in Turkish. Patients’ relatives were unsatisfied with physical conditions, waiting room setting and frequency of communication with nurses the most. The relatives were highly satisfied with the skills and competency of ICU doctors/nurses, setting of the ICU, completeness of treatment provided. Among the intensive care unit departments, there were not any statistically significantly different satisfaction results (p>0.05). The satisfaction level was found to decrease with increasing education levels and increasing duration of hospitalization (p<0.05). The satisfaction in the group who knew the diagnosis was higher (p<0.05). Conclusion: Even though the general satisfaction level of the patients’ relatives was high, satisfaction level can be increased by improving physical factors, such as the waiting room setting, and by training on the communication skills of all staff that have contact with the patients’ relatives on communication skills.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURHAN, Z. Y., AKIN, A. K., ONUK, S., GÜNDOĞAN, K. (2020). Evaluation of Family Satisfaction Level at Erciyes University Medical Faculty Intensive Care Units with a Validated Survey. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 264–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/214157

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Heyland DK, Rocker GM, Dodek PM, Kutsogiannis DJ, Konopad E, Cook DJ, et al. Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study. Crit Care Med 2002; 30(7): 1413–8
  2. Rothen HU, Stricker KH, Heyland DK. Family satisfaction with critical care: measurements and messages. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010; 16(6): 623–31
  3. Stricker KH, Kimberger O, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Mohr U, Rothen HU. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: what makes the difference?. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35(12): 205–9
  4. Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Heyland DK, Curtis JR. Refinement, scoring, and validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey. Crit Care Med 2007; 35(1): 271–9
  5. Wasser T, Pasquale MA, Matchett SC, Bryan Y, Pasquale M. Establishing reliability and validity of the critical care family satisfaction survey. Crit Care Med 2001; 29(1): 192–6
  6. Azoulay E, Chevret S, Leleu G, Pochard F, Barboteu M, Adrie C, et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Crit Care Med 2000; 28(8): 3044–9
  7. Thermaenius J, Schandl A, Sluys KP. Development and initial validation of the Swedish Family Satisfaction Intensive Care Questionnaire (SFS-ICQ). Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2019: 50; 118–24
  8. Heyland DK, Tranmer JE; Kingston General Hospital ICU Research Working Group. Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: the development of a questionnaire and preliminary results. J Crit Care 2001; 16(4): 142–9
  9. Stricker KH, Niemann S, Bugnon S, Wurz J, Rohrer O, Rothen HU. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: cross-cultural adaptation of a questionnaire. J Crit Care 2007; 22(3): 204–11
  10. Dale B, Frivold G. Psychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the questionnaire Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FSICU- 24). J Multidiscip Healthc 2018; 11: 653–9
  11. Lai VKW, Li JC, Lee A. Psychometric validation of the Chinese patient- and family satisfaction in the intensive care unit questionnaires. J Crit Care 2019; 54: 58–64
  12. Hunziker S, McHugh W, Sarnoff-Lee B, Cannistraro S, Ngo L, Marcantonio E, et al. Predictors and correlates of dissatisfaction with intensive care. Crit Care Med 2012; 40(5): 1554–61
  13. Dodek PM, Heyland DK, Rocker GM, Cook DJ. Translating family satisfaction data into quality improvement. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 1922–7
  14. Khalaila R. Patients’ family satisfaction with