Journals / Acta Medica Alanya / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

The relationship of gastrointestinal complications and ventilator related status with gastric residual volume in intensive care patients

Yoğun Bakım Hastalarında İki Farklı Gastrik Rezidüel Volümün Gastrointestinal Komplikasyon ve Ventilatör İlişkili Durum İle İlişkisi

Pages
157–163
Publication Date
2022-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For all patients, necessarydata was recorded and high gastric residual volume rates (HGRV), times to reachtarget calories, mean GRV amounts, abdominal distension, vomiting, diarrhea, VACand infection-related ventilator-related complications (IVAC) were all observed.Results: Although there were statistically significant differences between the groupsin terms of the HGRV rates and the HGRV rates exceeding the determined thresholdvalues [p 0.05).Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that measuring the amount of GRVin intensive care patients fed by EN via the nasogastric tube in order to decide ongastrointestinal motility function and to reduce the complication rate, is not necessary

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Our study aimed primarily to determine whether there was a relationship betweentotal gastric residual volume (GRV) amounts and two different GRV thresholds andthe development of gastrointestinal intolerance in patients on mechanical ventilationin the intensive care unit (ICU) and secondarily, to determine the effects of differentGRV quantities on ventilator-related conditions (VAC).Methods: Seventy patients above the age of 18 who were scheduled to be fed withenteral nutrition (EN) for at least three days, were divided into two groups including 35patients according to GRV threshold values of 250 ml and 500 ml.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The total amountsof GRV of the patients who did not exceed any of the two GRV thresholds during thefollow-up period of 72 hours were recorded and calculated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For all patients, necessarydata was recorded and high gastric residual volume rates (HGRV), times to reachtarget calories, mean GRV amounts, abdominal distension, vomiting, diarrhea, VACand infection-related ventilator-related complications (IVAC) were all observed.Results: Although there were statistically significant differences between the groupsin terms of the HGRV rates and the HGRV rates exceeding the determined thresholdvalues [p 0.05).Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that measuring the amount of GRVin intensive care patients fed by EN via the nasogastric tube in order to decide ongastrointestinal motility function and to reduce the complication rate, is not necessary
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Our study aimed primarily to determine whether there was a relationship betweentotal gastric residual volume (GRV) amounts and two different GRV thresholds andthe development of gastrointestinal intolerance in patients on mechanical ventilationin the intensive care unit (ICU) and secondarily, to determine the effects of differentGRV quantities on ventilator-related conditions (VAC).Methods: Seventy patients above the age of 18 who were scheduled to be fed withenteral nutrition (EN) for at least three days, were divided into two groups including 35patients according to GRV threshold values of 250 ml and 500 ml. The total amountsof GRV of the patients who did not exceed any of the two GRV thresholds during thefollow-up period of 72 hours were recorded and calculated. For all patients, necessarydata was recorded and high gastric residual volume rates (HGRV), times to reachtarget calories, mean GRV amounts, abdominal distension, vomiting, diarrhea, VACand infection-related ventilator-related complications (IVAC) were all observed.Results: Although there were statistically significant differences between the groupsin terms of the HGRV rates and the HGRV rates exceeding the determined thresholdvalues [p 0.05).Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that measuring the amount of GRVin intensive care patients fed by EN via the nasogastric tube in order to decide ongastrointestinal motility function and to reduce the complication rate, is not necessary

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı, yoğun bakım ünitesinde solunumu mekanik ventilasyon ile sağlanan hastalarda, toplam gastrik kalıntı hacim miktarları ve iki farklı gastrik kalıntı hacmi eşiği ile gastrointestinal komplikasyon gelişimi arasında ilişki olup olmadığının tespiti, ikinci hedefimiz ise farklı gastrik kalıntı hacimlerinin, ventilatör ilişkili durumlar üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemektir. Metod: Çalışmaya en az 3 gün enteral beslenme planlanan, 18 yaşın üzerindeki 70 adet yetişkin hasta dahil edildi. Birinci gruptaki 35 hastada gastrik kalıntı hacmi eşiği 250 ml, ikinci grupta ise 500 ml olarak belirlendi. İzlem süresi boyunca, belirlenen her iki gastrik kalıntı hacmi eşiğinden herhangi birini aşmamış olan hastaların, 72 saat boyunca kaydedilen gastrik kalıntı hacimlerinin toplam miktarı hesaplandı. Tüm hastaların yüksek gastrik kalıntı hacim oranları, hedef kaloriye ulaşma süreleri, ortalama mide kalıntı hacim miktarları, abdominal distansiyon, kusma, diyare, ventilatör ilişkili durum ve enfeksiyona bağlı ventilatör ilişkili komplikasyon oranları gözlendi. Bulgular: Çalışmamızın sonunda, iki grup arasında yüksek gastrik kalıntı hacim oranları, belirlenen eşik değerini aşan yüksek gastrik kalıntı hacim oranları arasına, anlamlı bir fark oluşmasına rağmen (p 0.05) Sonuç: Bu sonuçlar, enteral yolla beslenen yoğun bakım hastalarında, gastrointestinal motiliteyi ölçmek ve komplikasyon oranını azaltmak için gastrik kalıntı hacim miktarlarının ölçülmesinin gerekli olmadığı düşündürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCAÖZ, F., DESTEGÜL, D., KAÇMAZ, M., BAYRAKTAR, M., TURHAN, Z. Y. (2022). The relationship of gastrointestinal complications and ventilator related status with gastric residual volume in intensive care patients. Acta Medica Alanya, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 157–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/425483

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Dhaliwal R, Cahill N, Lemieux M, Heyland DK. The Canadian critical care nutrition guidelines in 2013: an update on current recommendations and implementation strategies. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014
  2. 29(1):29-43. PMID: 24297678 2. Mallampalli A, Mcclave Sa, Snider Hl. Defining tolerance to enteral feeding in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2000
  3. 19(4):213-5. DOI: 10.1054/clnu.2000.0137 3. Metheny NA, Schallom L, Oliver DA, Clouse RE. Gastric residual volume and aspiration in critically ill patients receiving gastric feedings. Am J Crit Care. 2008
  4. 17(6):512-9. PMID: 18978236 4. Metheny NA, Mills AC, Stewart BJ. Monitoring for intolerance to gastric tube feedings: a national survey. Am J Crit Care. 2012
  5. 21(2):e33-e40. DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2012647 5. Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 201
  6. 38(1):48-79. PMID: 30348463 6. Erbay RH, Yalcin AN, Zencir M, Serin S, Atalay H. Costs and risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in a Turkish university hospital's intensive care unit: a case-control study. BMC Pul Med. 2004
  7. 4(1):3. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-4-3 7. Parrish CR, McClave SA. Checking gastric residual volumes: a practice in search of science. Practical Gastroenterology. 2008
  8. McClave SA, Lukan JK, Stefater JA, Lowen CC, Looney SW, Matheson PJ, et al. Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker for risk of aspiration in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2005
  9. 33(2):324-30. PMID: 15699835 9. Magill SS, Klompas M, Balk R, Burns SM, Deutschman CS, Diekema D, et al. Developing a new, national approach to surveillance for ventilator-associated events. Am J Crit Care. 2013
  10. 22(6):469-73. PMID: 24186816 10. Pinilla JC, Samphire J, Arnold C, Liu L, Thiessen B. Comparison of gastrointestinal tolerance to two enteral feeding protocols in critically III patients: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2001
  11. 25(2):81-6. DOI: 10.1177/014860710102500281 11. Deane A, Chapman MJ, Fraser RJ, Bryant LK, Burgstad C, Nguyen NQ. Mechanisms underlying feed intolerance in the critically ill: implications for treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2007
  12. 13(29):3909-17 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i29.3909 12. Wøien H, Bjørk IT. Nutrition of the critically ill patient and effects of implementing a nutritional support algorithm in ICU. J Clin Nurs. 2006
  13. 15(2):168-77. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01262.x 13. Sanderson IR, Croft NM. The