Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of caudal prilocaine,bupivacaine and ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in children

Çocuklarda kaudal prilokain,bupivakain veya ropivakainin postoperatif analjezik etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
124–128
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: All three anesthetic agents may be used effectively in caudal anesthesia in children but time to first analgesic requirement was found to be shorter for prilocaine.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the effects of prilocaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine for postoperative pain management in children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Sixty ASA I-II children between 1 and 7 years of age and scheduled for urologic surgery with general anaesthesia were recruited.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: All three anesthetic agents may be used effectively in caudal anesthesia in children but time to first analgesic requirement was found to be shorter for prilocaine.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the effects of prilocaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine for postoperative pain management in children. Method: Sixty ASA I-II children between 1 and 7 years of age and scheduled for urologic surgery with general anaesthesia were recruited. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups. Group I received caudal prilocaine 1% 0.5 mL kg-1 after the operation, Group II received 0.25 % 1 mL kg-1 bupivacaine and Group III received 0.25 % 1 mL kg-1 after induction of anesthesia. During anaesthesia, hemodynamic parameters and fentanyl requirements were recorded. Haemodynamic parameters, sedation and pain scores were recorded at 15 and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours following recovery from anaesthesia. Pain was evaluated by CHEOPS and sedation with a five point sedation test. Results: Demographic data were similar in all groups. No statistically significant differences between the groups were observed in intraoperative haemodynamic parameters. The first analgesic requirement time was 247.5±159.0 minutes in Group I, 315.0±117.8 minutes in Group II and 340.2±93.9 minutes in Group III. The intraoperative fentanyl requirement was higher in Group I than in the other two groups (p<0.05). Sedation scores and CHEOPS were similiar in all groups. No motor block was seen in either group on awakening. There were no differences in the insidence of emesis, vomiting and urinary retention among the groups. Conclusion: All three anesthetic agents may be used effectively in caudal anesthesia in children but time to first analgesic requirement was found to be shorter for prilocaine.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmada çocuklarda kaudal olarak uygulanan prilokain, ropivakain ve bupivakainin postoperatif analjezik etkilerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Yöntem: Genel anestezi altında ürolojik cerrahi girişim geçiren, 1-7 yaşları arasında, ASA I-II 60 çocuk çalışmaya alındı. Hastalar randomize olarak üç gruba ayrıldı. Grup I’e kaudal %1 prilokain 0.5 mL kg-1 cerrahi bitiminden sonra, Grup II’ye %0.25 bupivakain 1 mL kg-1 ve Grup III’e %0.25 ropivakain 1 mL kg-1 indüksiyondan sonra uygulandı. Anestezi süresince hastaların hemodinamik parametreleri ve fentanil ihtiyaçları kaydedildi. Derlenme sonrasında, hastaların 15.dk, 30.dk, 1, 2, 4 ve 6. saatlerdeki hemodinamik parametreleri, ağrı ve sedasyon skorları kaydedildi. Ağrı CHEOPS ve sedasyon 5 nokta sedasyon testiyle değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Bütün gruplarda demografik veriler benzerdi. ‹ntraoperatif hemodinamik parametreler açısından, gruplar arasında fark gözlenmedi. ‹lk analjezik ihtiyaç zamanı Grup I’de 247.5± 159.0 dk, Grup II’de 315.0 ±117.8 dk ve Grup III’de 340.2±93.9 dk olarak bulundu. ‹ntraoperatif dönemde uygulanan toplam fentanil ihtiyacı Grup I’de, diğer iki gruptan daha fazlaydı (p<0.05). Hiçbir grupta uyanıkken motor blok gözlenmedi. Gruplar arasında sedasyon ve CHEOPS skorları yönünden fark bulunmadı. Sonuç: Her üç lokal anesteziğin de çocuklarda postoperatif kaudal analjezide etkili olduğu, ancak prilokainin ropivakaine göre ilk analjezik ihtiyaç zamanının daha kısa olduğu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

HONCA, M., KARAGÖZ, A. H., DENİZ, M., ÇELEBİ, N., CANBAY, Ö., ÖZGEN, S. (2007). Comparison of caudal prilocaine,bupivacaine and ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in children. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 124–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/214015

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. De Beer DA, Thomas ML. Caudal additives in children- solutions or problems? Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 487-98
  2. Panjabi N, Prakash S, Gupta P, Gogia AR. Efficacy of three doses of ketamine with bupivacaine for caudal analgesia in paediatric inguinal herniotomy. Reg Anesth and Pain Med 2004; 29: 28-31
  3. Özbek H, Bilen A, Özcengiz D, Güneş Y, Özalevli M, Akman H. The comparison of caudal ketamine, alfentanil and ketamine plus alfentanil administration for postoperative analgesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2002;12: 610-6
  4. Özyuvacı E, Altan A, Yücel M, Yenmez K. Evaluation of adding preoperative or postoperative rectal paracetamol to caudal bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; 14: 661-5
  5. Johnston P, Findlow D, Aldridge LM, Doyle E. The effect of ketamine on 0.25 % and 0.125 % bupivacaine for caudal epidural blockade in children. Paediatr Anaesth 1999; 9: 31-4
  6. Mahajan R, Grover VK, Chari P. Caudal neostigmine with bupivacaine produces a dose-independent analgesic effect in children. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51: 702-6
  7. Hansen TG, Henneberg SW, Walther-Larsen S, Lund J, Hansen M. Caudal bupivacaine supplemented with caudal or intravenous clonidine in children undergoing hypospadias repair: a double blind study. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 223-7
  8. Martindale SJ, Dix P, Stoddart PA. Double-blind randomized controlled trial of caudal versus intravenous S(+)- ketamine for supplementation of caudal analgesia in children. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 344-7
  9. Frey B, Kehrer B. Toxic methaemoglobin concentrations in premature infants after application of a prilocaine-containing cream and peridural prilocaine. Eur J Pediatr 1999; 158: 785-8
  10. Koinig H, Krenn CG, Glaser C ve ark. The dose- response of caudal ropivacaine in children. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1339-44
  11. Valenzuela C, Delpón E, Tamkun MM, Tamargo J, Snyders DJ. Stereoselective block of a human cardiac potassium channel (Kv 1.5) by bupivacaine enantiomers. Biophys J 1995; 69: 418-27
  12. Aberg G. Toxicological and local anaesthetic effects of optically active isomers of two local anaesthetic compounds. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 1972; 31: 273-86
  13. Mazoit JX, Boico O, Samii K. Myocardial uptake of bupivacaine: II. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bupivacaine enantiomers in the isolated perfused rabbit heart. Anesth Analg 1993;77: 477-82
  14. Vanhoutte F, Vereecke J, Verbeke N, Carmeliet E. Stereoselective effects of the enantiomers of bupivacaine on the