Journals / JAREM / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

When Should operastions requiring suturing be performed in laparoscopic urologic surgery? first four years analysis of four different operations

Laparoskopik ürolojik cerrahide sütür gerektiren operasyonlar ne zaman yapılmalı? dört farklı operasyonun ilk dört yıllık analizi

Journal
JAREM
Pages
8–13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: A novice surgeon can gain laparoscopic competency within 1 year for ureterolithotomy, within 2 years in pyeloplasty, and within 3 years in partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to retrospectively compare the first four years outcome of a novice laparoscopic surgeon in suture-requiring laparoscopic pro- cedures annual section.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Between 2008-2012, a total of 160 laparoscopic suture-requiring procedures were retrospectively evaluated with conversions, operative times and hospital stay, and optimum time-interval to reach surgical competency.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: A novice surgeon can gain laparoscopic competency within 1 year for ureterolithotomy, within 2 years in pyeloplasty, and within 3 years in partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to retrospectively compare the first four years outcome of a novice laparoscopic surgeon in suture-requiring laparoscopic pro- cedures annual section. Methods: Between 2008-2012, a total of 160 laparoscopic suture-requiring procedures were retrospectively evaluated with conversions, operative times and hospital stay, and optimum time-interval to reach surgical competency. Results: All 12 ureterolithotomies were completed laparoscopically, 3 transperitoneal and 9 retroperitoneal approaches, witha mean operative time of 145.4±42.4 mins. and mean 2.4±0.7 days of hospital stay. Optimum experience was accomplished within 2nd years. All laparoscopic pyeloplasties were successfully completed with a mean operative time of 226.6±63.8 mins and mean 6.2±2.5 days of hospital stay. Optimum experience was ac- complished within 4th years. All 6 partial nephrectomies were completed laparoscopically with a mean operative time of 195±31.4 mins, with 6.3±3.6 days hospital stay and without blood transfusion. The optimum experience was accomplished within 4th years in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Among 32 radical prostatectomies, 25 were completed with laparoscopy and 7 with open conversion. The mean operative time was 300±103.9 mins and hospital stay of 8.1±5.7 days. The optimum experience was gained at the 4th year in laparoscopic prostatectomy. Conclusion: A novice surgeon can gain laparoscopic competency within 1 year for ureterolithotomy, within 2 years in pyeloplasty, and within 3 years in partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy.

Özet

Amaç: Laparoskopik cerrahiyi kursiyer düzeyinde öğrenen, kliniğinde laparoskopi deneyimi olmayan bir üroloğun ilk dört yıllık sütür gerektiren ope- rasyonlarını retrospektif olarak inceleyerek yıllık dilimler şeklinde sonuçlarını karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntemler: Laparoskopik cerrahi uygulanan 160 hasta 2008-2012 yılları arasında incelendi. Operasyonların sayısı, açığa geçme oranı, süresi, hastaların hastanede kalma süresi yıllık dilimler şeklinde dörde bölünerek karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Laparoskopik üreterolitotomi yapılan 12 operasyonun tamamı laparoskopik tamamlandı. Ortalama operasyon süresi 145,4±42,4 dakika, hastanede kalma süresi 2,4±0,7 gün olarak bulundu. Optimum parametreye 2. yıl ulaşıldı. Laparoskopik piyeloplasti yapılan 9 operasyonun tamamı laparoskopik tamamlandı. Ortalama operasyon süresi 226,6±63,8 dakika, hastanede kalma süresi 6,2±2,5 gün olarak bulundu. Optimum parametreye 4. yıl ulaşıldı. Laparoskopik parsiyel nefrektomi yapılan 6 operasyonun tamamı laparoskopik tamamlandı. Ortalama operasyon süresi 195±31,4 dakika, hastanede kalma süresi 6,3±3,6 gün, ortanca iskemi süresi 26,5±8,3 dakika olarak bulundu. Optimum parametreye 4. yıl ulaşıldı. Laparoskopik radikal prostatektomi yapılan 32 operasyonun 25’i laparoskopik tamamlandı. Ortalama operasyon süresi 300±103,9 dakika olup, hastanede kalma süresi 8,1±5,7 gün bulundu. Optimum parametreye 4. yıl ulaşıldı. Sonuç: Laparoskopide sütür atma beceri gerektiren bir işlemdir. Laparoskopiye kursiyer düzeyinde başlayan bir ürolog 1 yıl sonra üreterolitotomi, 2 yıl sonra piyeloplasti, 3 yıl sonra parsiyel nefrektomi ve radikal prostatektomi yapacak beceriye ulaşabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYAR, G., TANRIVERDİ, O., TAŞKIRAN, M., SARIOĞULLARI, U., ACINIKLI, H., HORASANLI, K., MİROĞLU, C. (2013). When Should operastions requiring suturing be performed in laparoscopic urologic surgery? first four years analysis of four different operations. JAREM, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 8–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/213221

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Cortesi N, Ferrari P, Zambarda E, Manenti A, Baldini A, Morano FP. Diagnosis of bilateral abdominal cryptorchidism by laparoscopy. En- doscopy 1976: 8
  2. [CrossRef] 2. European Association of Urology Guidelines 2012: 981. 3. Khaladkar S, Modi J, Bhansali M, Dobhada S, Patankar S. Which is the best option to treat large (>1.5 cm) midureteric calculi? J Lapa- roendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009
  3. [CrossRef] 4. Lopes Neto AC, Korkes F, Silva JL 2nd, Amarante RD, Mattos MH, Tobias-Machado M, et al. J Urol 2012
  4. [CrossRef] 5. Fan T, Xian P, Yang L, Liu Y, Wei Q, Li H. Experience and learning curve of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteral calculi. J Endourol 2009
  5. [CrossRef] 6. Jeong BC, Park HK, Byeon SS, Kim HH. Retroperitoneal laparosco- pic ureterolithotomy for upper ureter stones. J Korean Med Sci 2006
  6. [CrossRef] 7. El-Feel A, Abouel-Fettouh H, Abdel-Hakim AM. Laparoscopic trans- peritoneal ureterolithotomy. J Endourol 2007
  7. [CrossRef] 8. Gaur DD, Trivedi S, Prabhudesai MR, Madhusudhana HR, Gopic- hand M. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2002
  8. [CrossRef] 9. European Association of Urology Guidelines 2012: 1575. 10. European Association of Urology Guidelines Pediatric Urology 2013: 62. 11. Rassweiler JJ, Subotic S, Feist-Schwenk M, Sugiono M, Schulze M, Teber D, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser en- dopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty. J Urol 2007
  9. [CrossRef] 12. Moon DA, El-Shazly MA, Chang CM, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG. La- paroscopic pyeloplasty: Evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 2006
  10. [CrossRef] 13. Raz O, Mendlovic S, Shilo Y, Leibovici D, Sandbank J, Lindner A, et al. Positive surgical margins with renal cell carcinoma have a limited influence on long-term oncological outcomes of nephron sparing surgery. Urology 2010
  11. [CrossRef] 14. European Association of Urology Guidelines 2012: 322. 15. Becker F, Van Poppel H, Hakenberg OW, Stief C, Gill I, Guazzoni G, et al. Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrec- tomy. Eur Urol 2009
  12. [CrossRef] 16. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a challenging operation with a steep learning curve. Can Urol Assoc J 2009
  13. European Association of Urology Guidelines 2012: 184. 18. El-