SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 586

The effect of information society parameters on economic growth

Bilgi toplumu parametrelerinin ekonomik büyümeye etkisi

SULTAN SALUR
Necmiye ŞİMŞİR CÖMERTLER
Pages
37–49
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the analysis show that the parameters of the information society dos not have a positive effect on GDP per capita.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The relationship between economic growth and the knowledge economy, is one of the major issues discussed in the literature, a lot of theoretical and practical studies have been conducted in this area.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The first analysis carried out with the data for 22 countries in the group of the Europe and Central Asia including Turkey according to the classification of the KAM Methodology for the period 2000-2007.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the analysis show that the parameters of the information society dos not have a positive effect on GDP per capita.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The relationship between economic growth and the knowledge economy, is one of the major issues discussed in the literature, a lot of theoretical and practical studies have been conducted in this area. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the parameters of the infrastructure of the information society with economic growth in Turkey empirically. This relationship has been tested with panel data analysis technique. The first analysis carried out with the data for 22 countries in the group of the Europe and Central Asia including Turkey according to the classification of the KAM Methodology for the period 2000-2007. The second analysis was made using data for 12 countries in the group of the upper-middle-income group including Turkey according to the classification of the KAM Methodology for the period 2000-2008. The results of the analysis show that the parameters of the information society dos not have a positive effect on GDP per capita.

Özet

Bilgi ekonomisi ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki, literatürde tartışılan önemli konulardan birisi olup bu alanda çokça teorik ve uygulamalı çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de bilgi toplumunun alt yapı parametreleri ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki olup olmadığını ampirik olarak test etmektir. Bu ilişkinin varlığı panel veri analizi tekniği ile test edilmiştir. Analiz ilk olarak, KAM Metodolojisinin yaptığı sınıflandırmaya göre Türkiye’nin de içinde bulunduğu Avrupa ve Orta Asya grubunda yer alan 22 ülke için 2000–2007 dönemine ait verilerle gerçekleştirilmiştir. İkinci analiz, yine KAM Metodolojisinin yaptığı sınıflandırmaya göre Türkiye’nin de içinde bulunduğu üst-orta gelir grubunda yer alan 12 ülke için 2000–2008 dönemine ait veriler kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Analiz sonuçları bilgi toplumu parametrelerinin kişi başına düşen gayrisafi yurtiçi hasıla üzerinde pozitif bir etkisi olmadığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SALUR, S., CÖMERTLER, N. Ş. (2013). The effect of information society parameters on economic growth. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 586, 37–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/213089

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. CHAVULA, Hopestone K.; (2010). “The Role of Knowledge in Economic Growth. The African Perspective”, ICT, Science and Technology Division (ISTD),United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). COLECCHIA, Alessandra ve Paul SCHREYER; (2001), “ICT Investment and Economic Growth in the 1990s: Is the United States a Unique Case? A Comparative Study of Nine OECD Countries”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2001/7, OECD, Paris, ss. 1-31.
  2. DEWAN, Sanjeev ve Kenneth L. KRAEMER; (2000), “Informa- tion Technology and Productivity: Evidence from Country Level Data”, Management Science, 46 (4), ss. 548-562.
  3. FERNANDEZ, Noelia and Martinez, Valeriano and SanchezRobles, Blanca; (2012), “R&D and Growth in the Spanish Regions: An Empirical Approximation”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 3 No. 10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2060924 or http:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2060924 GREINER, Alfred. ve Willi SEMLER; (2005), “Externalities of Investment and Endogenous Growth: Theory and Time Series Evidence”, Center for Empirical Macroeconomics Working Paper, No: 9, pp. 1-22.
  4. JORGENSON, Dale W. ve Kevin J STIROH; (2000), “Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in The Information Age”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No: 261. KANAMORİ, Takahito ve Kazayuki MOTOHASHİ; (2007), “Information Technology and Economic Growth: Comparison between Japan and Korea”, RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 07-E-009, ss. 1-26.
  5. KARAGIANNIS, Stelios; (2007), “The Knowledge-Based Economy, Convergence and Economic Growth: Evidence from the European Union”, Centre of Planning and Economic Research Discussion Papers, No: 91, ss. 1-40.
  6. MAS, Matilda ve Javier QUESADA; (2009), “ICT and Econom- ic Growth in Spain: 1985-2002”,
  7. MPRA Paper, No. 15823, ss. 1-58.
  8. MIYAGAWA, Tsutomu, Yukiko ITO ve Nobuyuki HARADA; (2002), “Does the IT Revolution Contribute to Japanese Economic Growth?”, JCER Discussion Paper No. 75, ss. 1-23.
  9. MOON, Seog-Woong, Yongkyu KİM ve Dong-Pyo HONG; (2005), The Economic Importance of The Information Communications Technology Industry in Korea: A CGE Approach http://www.monash.edu.au/policy/conf/51Yongkyu.pdf.
  10. NASAB, Ebrahim ve Majid AGHAEİ; (2009), “The Effect of ICT on Economic Growth: Further Evidence”, International Bulletin of Business Administration, ISSN: 1451-243X Issue 5, ss. 46- 56. O’MAHONY, Mary ve Michela VECCHI; (2003), “Is There an ICT Impact on TFP? A Heterogeneous Dynamic Panel Approach” NIESR Disc