Journals / Ege Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1

Augmentation of advanced bone defects for complicated implant placement in the aesthetic zone

Estetik bölge kompleks implant vakalarında ileri derecede kemik defekti bulunan kretlerin ogmentasyonu

Pages
52–56
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this surgical technique is to augment the palatal-buccal dimension of the bone in order to overcome the difficulties which may possibly arise from insufficient bony structure before implant surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lack of sufficient bone to place a dental implant functionally and aesthetically at the most appropriate position is a common problem, especially in the upper anterior jaw.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the methods to solve this problem is to augment the processus alveolaris by an autogenous graft.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this surgical technique is to augment the palatal-buccal dimension of the bone in order to overcome the difficulties which may possibly arise from insufficient bony structure before implant surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Lack of sufficient bone to place a dental implant functionally and aesthetically at the most appropriate position is a common problem, especially in the upper anterior jaw. One of the methods to solve this problem is to augment the processus alveolaris by an autogenous graft. Autogenous grafts are taken from the mentum or trigonum retromolare are placed at the buccal aspect of the maxillary (incisal region) fixed by osteosynthesis screws. The aim of this surgical technique is to augment the palatal-buccal dimension of the bone in order to overcome the difficulties which may possibly arise from insufficient bony structure before implant surgery.

Özet

İleri derecede kemik yetersizliği bulunan özellikle üst çene ön bölge vakalarında dental implantların fonksiyonel ve estetik olarak uygun pozisyonda yerleştirilmesi çoğu zaman bir problem olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Sorunu çözmek üzere uygulanan yöntemlerden birisi de bölgenin otojen onlay greftler ile ogmentasyonudur. Bu amaçla mentum ya da trigonum retromolare bölgesinden elde edilen otojen kemik greftleri maksilla anterior bölgeye bukkal taraftan yerleştirilip osteosentez vidaları ile fikse edilmektedir. Cerrahi yöntemin amacı kemik defektlerinin ogmentasyonu sonrası implant cerrahisine hazır hale getirilmesidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZEYTİNOĞLU, M., EROL, B., ZEYTİNOĞLU, B. (2013). Augmentation of advanced bone defects for complicated implant placement in the aesthetic zone. Ege Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1, 52–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/212869

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol 2007;78(3):377-96
  2. Van den Bergh JP, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Tuinzing DB. Preimplant surgery of the bony tissues. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(2):175-83
  3. Bernstein S, Cooke J, Fotek P, Wang HL. Vertical bone augmentation: Where are we now? Implant Dent 2006;15(3):219-28
  4. Petrungaro PS, Amar S. Localized ridge augmentation with allogenic block grafts prior to implant placement: Case reports and histologic evaluations. Implant Dent 2005;4(2):139-48
  5. Reinert S, Konig S, Bremerich A, Eufinger H, Krimmel M. Stability of bone grafting and placement of implants in the severely atrophic maxilla. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;41(4):249-55
  6. Juodzbalys G, Kubilius R, Eidukynas V, Raustia AM. Stress distribution in bone: Single unit implant prostheses veneered with porcelain or a new composite material. Implant Dent 2005;14(2):166-75
  7. Roumanas ED, Garrett NR, Hamada MO, Kapur KK. Comparisons of chewing difficulty of consumed foods with mandibular conventional dentures and implant-supported overdentures in diabetic denture wearers. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(9):609-15
  8. Cibirka RM, Razzoog M, Lang BR. Critical evaluation of patient responses to dental implant therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1997;8(6):574-81
  9. Heydecke G, Locker D, Awad MA, Lund JP, Feine JS. Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003;31(3):161-8
  10. Johansson B. Bone grafts and dental implants in the reconstruction of the severely atrophied edentulous maxilla. Dissertation for the degree of doctor of philosophy. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2001: 57
  11. Levin L, Nitzan D, Schwartz-Arad D. Success of dental implants placed in intraoral block bone grafts. J Periodontol 2007;78(1):18-21
  12. Schwartz-Arad D, Levin L, Sigal L. Surgical success of intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation. Implant Dent 2005;14(2):131-8
  13. Davarpanah M, Martínez H. Oral implantoloji klinik el kitabı. In: Davarpanah M, Martínez H, Donath K, Kebir M (eds). İmplant Tedavi Planı. 1. baskı. İstanbul: Quintessence Yayıncılık; 2004:20-1
  14. Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetics. In: Misch CE (ed). Available Bone and Implant Dentistry. 1st ed. St Louis; 2005:108-9
  15. Li Z, Zhao Y, Yao S, Zhao J, Yu S, Zhang W. Immediate reconstruction of mandibular defects: A retrospective report of 242 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007