Journals / Journal of Yasar University / 2014 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 36

Social Media and Word of Mouse: A Qualitative Research

Sosyal Ağlar ve E-Paylaşım: Kalitatif Bir Analiz

Pages
6283–6298
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After focus group studies; informativeness, entertainment, irritation, agenda setting are found as factors of determinative of the consumer attitude toward social networks ads

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Word of mouth is one of the oldest form of advertising.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The emergence of word of mouth advertising is fueled by the rise of internet.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After focus group studies; informativeness, entertainment, irritation, agenda setting are found as factors of determinative of the consumer attitude toward social networks ads
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Word of mouth is one of the oldest form of advertising. The emergence of word of mouth advertising is fueled by the rise of internet. Internet is created a new channel for word of mouth advertising and social networks are one of them. But it’s stil a new phenomen and there are not much study done in this field. Therefore this study starts from the development of the practice and go through the features, components and types of word of mouth advertising focused on internet. In this research consumer attitudes towards social networks and advertising on these channels are investigated by a qualitative research. As a social network Facebook and Twitter are examined. After focus group studies; informativeness, entertainment, irritation, agenda setting are found as factors of determinative of the consumer attitude toward social networks ads

Özet

Ağızdan ağıza reklam en eski reklam türlerinden biridir. Son yıllardaki hızlı gelişiminin altında yatan güç ise internetin yükselişi olmuştur. İnternet ağızdan ağıza reklam için yeni kanallar yaratmıştır. Sosyal Paylaşım siteleri bu yeni kanallar içerisinde en önde gelenlerden birini oluşturmaktadır. Tüm bu gelişmelere rağmen internette ağızdan ağıza reklam halen yeni bir olgudur ve alanda konuya dair sınırlı sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada önce uygulamanın gelişimine yer verilmiş ardından ise özellikleri, bileşenleri ve türleri üzerinde durulmuştur. Çalışmada internet kullanıcılarının sosyal paylaşım sitelerine ve söz konusu kanallarda yer alan reklamlara yönelik tutumu kalitatif yöntemler kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Sosyal paylaşım siteleri Facebook ve Twitter ile sınırlandırılmıştır. Araştırmada fokus grup sonrasında kullanıcıların sosyal paylaşım sitelerinde yer alan reklamlara yönelik tutumunu belirleyen faktörler; bilgi, eğlence, gündem belirleme ve rahatsızlık olarak belirlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, E. (2014). Social Media and Word of Mouse: A Qualitative Research. Journal of Yasar University, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 36, 6283–6298. https://ajindex.com/articles/212751

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Allsop, Dee T., Bryce R. Bassett and James A. Hoskins. 2007. “Word of Mouth Research: Principles and Applications.” Journal of Advertising Research 47(4): 398-411.
  2. Arndt, J. 1967. “Role of Product Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product.” Journal of Marketing Research 4 (3): 291-295.
  3. Breakenridge, D. 2008. PR 2.0 New Media, New Tools, New Audiences. New Jersey: Pearson. Buttle, Francis A. 1998. “Word of Mouth: Understanding and Managing Referral Marketing.” Journal of Strategic Marketing 6(3): 241-254.
  4. Chu, S., and Yoojung Kim. 2011. “Determinants of Consumer Engagement in Electronic Word of Mouth.” Journal of Advertising Research 30 (1): 47-75.
  5. Damian, R., and Calvin Jones. 2009. Understanding Digital Marketing( First Edition). Philadelphia: Kogan Page. Demirel, F. 2012. “Comscore Ocak 2012 için Türkiye’nin En popüler 20 Web Sitesini Açıkladı.” Webrazzi.com. Accessed April 11, 2012. http://www.webrazzi.com/2012/02/22/comscore-turkiye-ocak-2012-web/
  6. Dickey, Irene J., and W. F. Lewis. 2011. “An Overview of Digital Media & Advertising.” In Digital Media and Advertising, edited by Matthew S. Eastin, Terry Daugherty and Neal M. Burns, 1-31. New York: Information Science Reference. Ducoffe, Robert H. 1996. “Advertising Value and Advertising on the Web.” Journal of Advertising Research 36 (5): 21-35. Socialbakers Social Media. 2012. Facebook Statistics- July 2012. Last modified 2012. http://www.socialbakers.com/facebook-statistics/
  7. Gangadharbatla, H. 2011. “Motivations for Social Networking Site Adoption.” In Digital Media & Advertising, edited by Matthew S. Eastin, Terry Daugherty and Neal M. Burns, 262-274. New York: Information Science Reference. Gillin, Paul. 2007. The New Influencers (First Edition). California: Quill Driver Books. Hanjun, K., C. H. Cho, and M. S. Roberts. 2005. “Internet Uses and Gratifications.” Journal of Advertising Research 34(2): 57-70.
  8. Ho-Dac, N. N., S. J. Carson, and W. L. Moore. 2013. “The Effects of Positive and Negative Online Customer Reviews: Do Brand Strength and Category Maturity Matter.” Journal of Marketing 77(6): 37-53.
  9. Hung, K. H. and S. Y. Li. 2007. “The Influence of eWOM on Virtual Communities: Social Capital, Consumer Learning and Behavioural Outcomes." Journal of Advertising Research 47 (4): 485-495. IAB Türkiye. 2011. Haber Bülteni. Last modified 2012. http://www.iabturkiye.org/sites/default/files/iab_bultenhaziran-2011.pdf
  10. Johnson, Thomas J., Barbara K. Kaye, Shannon L. Bichard, and W. J. Wong. 2007.