Journals / JAREM / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

A novel minimally ınvasive treatment option for benign prostat hyperplasia: ıntraprostatic urolift®, the first case series of Turkey with short term follow-up

Benign prostat hiperplazisi'nin yeni minimal invaziv tedavi seçeneği: prostat içerisine urolift® uygulaması, erken dönem sonuçları ile Türkiye'den ilk vaka serisi

Journal
JAREM
Pages
74–78
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it was new, safe, a novel minimally invasive surgical treatment option in BPH.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate feasiblity, effectiveness, applicable of UroLift® which is a minimally invasive surgical treatment option in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Between March 2011 and May 2013, data of patients who were operated with UroLift®, were investigated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it was new, safe, a novel minimally invasive surgical treatment option in BPH.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate feasiblity, effectiveness, applicable of UroLift® which is a minimally invasive surgical treatment option in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: Between March 2011 and May 2013, data of patients who were operated with UroLift®, were investigated retrospectively. There were totally 10 patients. Demographic data of patients and internationale prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) index, internationale index of erectile function (IIEF), uroflowmetry (UFM) parameters were recorded before operation. Additionally, operation data, postoperative data and short follow-up were recorded and evaluated. In statistical analysis, statistical p value was accepted as p<0.05. Results: Mean age was 64.8±10 years, and 10 men evaluated totally. After 1 month and 3 months UroLift® implantation, in short follow-up, maximum (respectively; p<0.001, p<0.001) and mean urine flow rate statistical significant increased (respectively; p<0.001, p<0.001). Additionally post mictional residuel volume in bladder statistical significantly decreased (respectively; p=0.025, p=0.016). There was statistically significant decrease in IPSS after 1st and 3rd months of surgery (respectively, p<0.001, p<0.001). Development in QoL index were parallel to develoments in IPSS, after 1 month and 3 months of surgery (respectively; p=0.022, p=0.003). UroLift® was effective in all patients. Additionally, there was no significant difference in IIEF scores in follow-up. Conclusion: UroLift® was effevtive in selected patients. In addition, it was new, safe, a novel minimally invasive surgical treatment option in BPH.

Özet

Amaç: Benign prostat hiperplazisinin (BPH) yeni minimal invaziv tedavi seçeneği olan UroLift® sisteminin uygulanabilirliğini, etkinliğinin ve güvenirliğini değerlendirdik. Yöntemler: Mart 2011 ile Mayıs 2013 tarihleri arasında BPH tanısıyla UroLift® uygulanan hastaların verileri geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Toplam 10 hasta değerlendirmeye alındı. Hastaların demografik verileri, uluslararası prostat semptom skoru (IPSS), hayat kalitesi (QoL) indeksi, ereksiyon işlevi uluslararası indeksi (IIEF), Uroflowmetrik (UFM) parametreleri içeren operasyon öncesi, operasyon verileri ve operasyon sonrasındaki kısa dönemli takip sonuçları değerlendirildi. İstatistiki analizlerde anlamlı p değeri, p<0,05 olarak kabul edildi. Bulgular: Ortalama yaşı 64.8±10, toplam 10 erkek hasta çalışma kapsamında değerlendirildi. UroLift® ile tedavi sonrasında, kısa dönemli takiplerde UFM’de 1. ayda ve 3. ayda maksimum (sırasıyla; p<0,001, p<0,001) ve ortalama akım hızında istatistiki anlamlı artış (sırasıyla p<0,001, p<0,001) ve miksiyon sonrasında mesanede kalan idrar miktarında da istatistiki anlamlı azalma saptandı (sırasıyla; p=0,025, p=0,016). IPSS’te 1. ve 3. aydaki takiplerde istatistiki anlamlı düzelme mevcuttu (sırasıyla p<0,001, p<0,001). QoL skorlarındaki iyileşme 1. ve 3. ay takiplerde, IPSS’teki iyileşmeye paraleldi (sırasıyla p=0,022, p=0,003). UroLift® cihazı tüm hastalarda etkindi. Ayrıca kısa dönemli takiplerde, operasyon sonrası 1. ve 3. aylarda, başlangıca göre IIEF skorlarında istatistiki anlamlı değişim saptanmadı. Sonuç: UroLift® cihazı seçilmiş hastalarda uygulandığında, BPH tedavisinde uygulanan yeni, güvenli ve etkin minimal invaziv tedavi seçeneğidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, Y., BOZKURT, A., KELEŞ, M. O., GÜLMEZ, H., ŞAHİN, M., NUHOĞLU, B. (2013). A novel minimally ınvasive treatment option for benign prostat hyperplasia: ıntraprostatic urolift®, the first case series of Turkey with short term follow-up. JAREM, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 74–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/212630

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Chute CG, Panser LA, Girman CJ, Oesterling JE, Guess HA, Jacobsen SJ, et al. The prevalence of prostatism: a population- based survey of urinary symptoms. J Urol 1993
  2. Gai M, Corona G, Salvi M, Vignozzi L, McVary KT, Kaplan SA, et al. A syste- matic review and meta-analysis on the use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors alone or in combination with α-blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 2012
  3. [CrossRef] 3.Chen Y, Zhang X, Hu X, Deng Y, Chen J, Li S, et al. The potential role of a self-management intervention for benign prostate hyperplasia. Urology 2012
  4. [CrossRef] 4.Arenas da Silva LF, Schonthaler M, Cruz F, Gratzke C, Zumbe J, Stenzl A, et al. New Treatment strategies for male lower urinary tract symptoms. Urologe A 2012
  5. [CrossRef] 5.Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Emberton M, Gravas S, Mic- hel MC, et al. EAU Guidelines on the Treatment and Follow-up of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Including Be- nign Prostatic Obstruction. Eur Urol 2013
  6. [CrossRef] 6. McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC, Don- nell RF, et al. Update on AUA guideline on the management of be- nign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2011
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Kaplan SA. AUA Guidelines and Their Impact on the Management of BPH: An Update. Rev Urol 2004
  8. 6 (Suppl 9): 46-52. 8. Woo HH, Chin PT, McNicholas TA, Gill HS, Plante MK, Bruskewitz RC, et al. Safety and feasibility of the prostatic urethral lift: a novel, minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). BJU Int 2011
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Chin PT, Bolton DM, Jack G, Rashid P, Thavaseelan J, Yu RJ, et al. Prostatic urethral lift: two-year results after treatment for lower uri- nary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Uro- logy 2012
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Akin Y, Gulmez H, Ucar M, Yucel S. The effect of first dose of tamsulosin on flow rate and its predictive ability on the improvement of LUTS in men with BPH in the mid-term. Int Urol Nephrol 2013
  11. 4 5: 45-51. [CrossRef] 11. McNicholas TA, Woo HH, Chin PT, Bolton D, Fernández Arjona M, Si- evert KD, et al. Minimally invasive prostatic urethral lift: surgical technique and multinational experience. Eur Urol 2013
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Woo HH, Bolton DM, Laborde E, Jack G, Chin PT, Rashid P, et al. Preservation of sexual functio