Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Türkçe ve İngilizce Yorumların Duygu Analizinde Doküman Vektörü Hesaplama Yöntemleri için Bir Deneysel İnceleme

An Experimental Investigation of Document Vector Computation Methods for Sentiment Analysis of Turkish and English Reviews

Pages
467–481
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sentiment analysis is the task of identifying overall attitude of the given text documents by using text analysis and natural language processing techniques.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sentiment analysis is the task of identifying overall attitude of the given text documents by using text analysis and natural language processing techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We have obtained 91.33% accuracy as the best on our collected Turkish product reviews dataset by using C-SVC SVM type with linear kernel, log normalization TF* probabilistic IDF weighting scheme, L2 vector normalization, Chi-square feature selection, and unigram word tokenization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A very detailed comparison of the document vector computation methods over Turkish and English datasets are also presented.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is the task of identifying overall attitude of the given text documents by using text analysis and natural language processing techniques. In this study, we present experimental results of sentiment analysis on movie and product reviews datasets that are in Turkish and English languages by using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier. Moreover, we compare different document vector computation techniques and show their effects on the sentiment analysis. We empirically evaluate SVM types, kernel types, weighting schemes such as TF or TF*IDF, TF variances, IDF variances, tokenization methods, feature selection systems, text preprocessing techniques and vector normalizations. We have obtained 91.33% accuracy as the best on our collected Turkish product reviews dataset by using C-SVC SVM type with linear kernel, log normalization TF* probabilistic IDF weighting scheme, L2 vector normalization, Chi-square feature selection, and unigram word tokenization. A very detailed comparison of the document vector computation methods over Turkish and English datasets are also presented.

Özet

Duygu analizi, verilen bir metin belgesinin genel yargısını, metin analizi ve doğal dil işleme teknikleri kullanarak belirleme işlemidir. Bu çalışmada, İngilizce ve Türkçe dillerinde yazılmış film ve ürün yorumlarının, Destek Vektör Makineleri (DVM) sınıflayıcısı kullanarak yapılan, duygu analizi deney sonuçları yer almaktadır. Bunun yanında, farklı doküman vektör hesaplama yöntemleri karşılaştırılmakta ve bu tekniklerin duygu analizi üzerindeki etkileri gösterilmektedir. DVM türleri, kernel çeşitleri, TF veya TF*IDF gibi ağırlıklandırma yöntemleri, TF türleri, IDF türleri, öznitelik oluşturma yöntemleri, öznitelik seçme sistemleri, metin önişleme teknikleri ve vektör normalizasyon teknikleri deneysel olarak analiz edilmektedir. Oluşturduğumuz Türkçe ürün yorumları veri kümesi üzerinde, doğrusal kernel ile kullanılan C-SVC DVM türü, log normalleştirme TF* olasılıklı IDF ağırlıklandırma yöntemi, L2 vektör normalizasyonu, Ki-kare öznitelik seçme ve tekli kelime öznitelikleri kullanılarak %91.33 doğruluk ile en iyi sonuç elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca doküman vektörü hesaplama yöntemlerinin Türkçe ve İngilizce veri kümeleri üzerindeki detaylı karşılaştırmaları da çalışmada yer almaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖZÜKARA, F., ÖZEL, S. A. (2016). Türkçe ve İngilizce Yorumların Duygu Analizinde Doküman Vektörü Hesaplama Yöntemleri için Bir Deneysel İnceleme. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 467–481. https://ajindex.com/articles/212417

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kaya, M., Fidan, G., Toroslu, I.H., 2012. Sentiment Analysis of Turkish Political News, In Proceedings of the the 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 01:174-180
  2. Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J. 2011. LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 2:3, p. 27
  3. Melville, P., Gryc, W., Lawrence, R. D., 2009. Sentiment Analysis of Blogs by Combining Lexical Knowledge with Text Classification, In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1275-1284
  4. Pang, B., Lee, L., 2008. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2:1-2, p. 1-135
  5. Liu, B., Zhang, L., 2012. A Survey of Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis, In Mining Text Data, 415-463
  6. Vinodhini, G., Chandrasekaran, R., 2012. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining: A Survey, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2: 6, p. 282-292
  7. Pang, B., Lee, L., Vaithyanathan, S., 2002. Thumbs Up?: Sentiment Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques, In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 10:79-86
  8. Brown, R. W., 1957. Linguistic Determinism and the Part of Speech, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55:1-5
  9. Pang, B., Lee, L., 2004. A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis Using Subjectivity Summarization Based on Minimum Cuts, Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, 271-278
  10. Hu, M., Liu, B., 2004. Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews. Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 168-177
  11. Dave, K., Lawrence, S., Pennock, D. M., 2003. Mining the Peanut Gallery, Opinion Extraction and Semantic Classification of Product Reviews, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, 519-528
  12. Li, G., Liu, F., 2012. Application of a Clustering Method on Sentiment Analysis, Journal of Information Science, 38:2, p. 127- 139
  13. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P., 2005. Recognizing Contextual Polarity in PhraseLevel Sentiment Analysis, In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 347-354
  14. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P., 2009. Recognizing Contextual Polarity