Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18

ANALYSIS OF PROFITABILITY IN DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS: TURKEY EXAMPLE

MEVDUAT BANKALARINDA KARLILIK ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
523–537
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the analysis, the net interest margin has a significant effect on the net profitability of public and private banks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to analyze the effect on the profitability of deposit banks operating in the Turkish banking sector between 2002Q4-2015Q2 using dynamic panel data methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results of the analysis, the net interest margin has a significant effect on the net profitability of public and private banks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the contrary, non-interest income is more dominant in public and private banks than in affecting equity profitability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mevduat Bankacılığı · Kârlılık İndikatörleri · Panel Veri Analizi

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to analyze the effect on the profitability of deposit banks operating in the Turkish banking sector between 2002Q4-2015Q2 using dynamic panel data methods. In working, profitability as a variable; two ratios were used: asset profitability and profitability over equity. According to the results of the analysis, the net interest margin has a significant effect on the net profitability of public and private banks. Non-interest income is equally effective in the active profitability of public and private banks and foreign banks. On the contrary, non-interest income is more dominant in public and private banks than in affecting equity profitability.

Özet

Bu çalışmada 2002Q4-2015Q2 döneminde Türk bankacılık sektöründe faaliyet gösteren mevduat bankalarının kârlılığı üzerindeki etkisinin dinamik panel veri yöntemleri kullanılarak incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada, bir değişken olarak kârlılık; varlık kârlılığı ve özkaynak kârlılığı olmak üzere de iki oran kullanılmıştır: Analizlerde kamu ve özel sermayeli bankaların yanı sıra yabancı sermayeli bankalar dikkate alınmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre net faiz marjı kamu ve özel sermayeli bankaların aktif kârlılığında önemli bir etkiye sahiptir. Faiz dışı gelir kamu ve özel sermayeli bankalar ve yabancı sermayeli bankaların aktif kârlılığında aynı oranda etkilidir. Bunun aksine faiz dışı gelir özsermaye kârlılığını etkilemede kamu ve özel sermayeli bankalarda daha ağır basmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOBAN, O., ÇOBAN, A., KODAZ, Ş. S., KURT, D. B. (2018). ANALYSIS OF PROFITABILITY IN DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS: TURKEY EXAMPLE. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18, 523–537. https://ajindex.com/articles/211071

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abreu, M. & Mendes, V. (2001). “Commercial Bank Interest Margins and Profitability: Evidence from Some EU Countries”. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Margarida_Abreu/publication/237460076_COMMERCIAL_BANK_INTEREST_MARGINS_AND_PROFITABILITY_EVIDENCE_FOR_SOME_EU_COUNTRIES/links/541036590cf2f2b29a3f6c67/COMMERCIAL-BANK-INTEREST-MARGINS-AND-PROFITABILITY-EVIDENCE-FOR-SOME-EU-COUNTRIES.pdf, 04.102017.
  2. Atanasieff, T.S., Lhacer, P.M.V. & Nakane, M.I. (2002). “The Determinants of Bank Interest Spreads in Brazil”. Banco Central Do Brasil, Working Papers, (46), http://www.bcb.gov.br/pec/wps/ingl/wps46.pdf, 04.10.2017.
  3. Bashir, A.-H.M. (2001). “Assesing the Performance of Islamic Banks: Some Evidence from Middle East”. http://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=meea, 04.10.2017.
  4. Barajas, A.R.S. & Salazar, N. (1999), “Interest Spreads in Colombia: 1974-96”. IMF Staff Papers, 46(2), 196-224, https://www.imf.org/external/Pubs/FT/staffp/1999/06-99/pdf/barajas.pdf, 04.10.2017.
  5. Çoban, O. & Selcen, Ş. (2011). “Türkiye de Para Politikalarının Bankaların Karlılıkları Üzerine Etkisi”. Selçuk Üniversitesi İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 16(22), 335-350.
  6. Çoban, O., Yorgancılar F.N. & Kabaklarlı, E. (2015). “Testing The Effects of BRSA on Turkish Banking Sector By Malmquist Indeks: 1995-2010”. Nigde Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 8(2), 121-141.
  7. Demirguc-Kunt, A. & Huizinga, H. (2000) “Financial Structure and Bank Profitability”. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTFR/Resources/475459-1108132178926/Kunt_Huizinga.pdf, 04.10.2017.
  8. Guru, B.K., Staunton, J. & Balashanmugam, B. (2000). “Determinants of Commercial Bank Profitability in Malaysia”. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 5(2), 1-22, http://web.usm.my/aamj/5.2.2000/5-2-1.pdf, 04.10.2017.
  9. Hausman, J. A. (1978). “Specification Tests in Econometrics”. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271.
  10. Jiang, G., Tang N., Law, E. & Sze, A. (2003). “Determinants of Bank Profitability in Hong Kong”. http://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/publication-and-research/quarterly-bulletin/qb200309/fa1.pdf, 04.10.2017.
  11. Molyneux, P. & Thornton, J. (1992). “Determinants of European Bank Profitability”. Journal of Banking and Finance, 16(6), 1173-1178.
  12. Naceur, B.S. (2003). “The Determinants of the Tunisian Banking Industry Profitability: Panel Evidence”. http://www.mafhoum.com/press6/174E11.pdf, 04.10.2017.
  13. Saunders, A. & L. Schumacher (2000).“The Determinants of Bank Interest Margins: An International Study”. Journal of Internatio