Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 587

Foreign debt and structural adjustment in turkey: Regime approach

Türkiye’de dış borçlanma ve yapısal uyum: Rejim yaklaşımı

Pages
52–67
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the relationship between economic development and borrowing variables is not linear.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Paper aims to examine the relationship between debt and growth variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study concentrated on the analysis of Turkey and utilized the data set for the period between 1970-2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the relationship between economic development and borrowing variables is not linear.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Paper aims to examine the relationship between debt and growth variables. In this context, Markov-Switching model is used because it allows the examination of unobservable variables in an observable model and provides steady algorithm to achieve robust optimization by iterations in a dynamic system, and is more flexible than prior models. This study concentrated on the analysis of Turkey and utilized the data set for the period between 1970-2009. In analyses, the relationship between growth and external borrowing is examined in terms of either short-term and long-term borrowing or separation of pub- lic and private external borrowing. In this context, according to results of multivariate dynamic Markov-Switching model, the main growth variables such as investment and human capital have positive impact on growth as expected. Findings can be summarized as follows; firstly, either in short or long term, public and/or private external borrowing has negative impact on growth both in regime at zero and regime at one. Secondly, the negative impact of public borrowing on economic development is higher than that of private borrowing on economic development. Thirdly, the negative impact of short term borrowing is lower than that of long term borrowing. Finally, the relationship between economic development and borrowing variables is not linear.

Özet

Çalışmada amaç borçlanma ve büyüme değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiyi inceleyerek modelleyebilmektir. Bu bağlamda gözlemlenen bir modelde gözlemlenemeyen değişkenlere izin vermesi ve dinamik bir sistemde iterasyonla güçlü optimizasyona ulaşmak için sağlam bir algoritma kullanılması ve kendinden önceki modellere göre daha esnek olması nedenleriyle Markov-Switching (MS) modeli takip edilmiştir. Çalışma Türkiye üzerine odaklanarak veriler 1974-2009 yılları arasındadır. Analizlerde büyüme ve dış borçlanma arasındaki ilişki gerek kısa dönem ve uzun dönem gerekse kamu ve özel dış borç ayrımı yapılarak ele alınmıştır. Bu kapsamda çok değişkenli dinamik Markov-Switching modeli sonuçlarına göre, yatırım ve beşeri sermaye gibi temel büyüme değişkenleri beklenildiği şekilde büyümeyi pozitif yönde etkilemektedir. Bulgular; birincisi gerek kısa dönem ve uzun dönem gerekse kamu ve özel dış borçlanma değişkenleri hem rejim sıfırda hem de rejim birde büyümeyi negatif etkilemektedir. İkincisi, kamu borçlanmasının ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki negatif etkisi özel borçlanmanın ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki negatif etkisinden daha büyüktür. Üçüncüsü, kısa dönem borçlanmanın negatif etkisi uzun dönem borçlanmanın negatif etkisine göre daha küçüktür. Son olarak, ekonomik büyüme ve borçlanma değişkenleri arasındaki ilişki doğrusal değildir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, İ. (2014). Foreign debt and structural adjustment in turkey: Regime approach. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 587, 52–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/210848

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ADAM, Christopher S., BEVAN, David L. “Fiscal deficits and growth in developing countries”, Journal of Public Economics 89, 2005, pp. 571– 597. ALBERT James H., Chib SIDDHARTHA. “Bayes Inference via Gibbs Sampling of Autoregressive Time Series Subject to Markov Mean and Variance Shifts”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol. 11, No. 1 Jan., 1993, pp. 1-15
  2. ANAS, J., Billio, M., FERRARA, L., DUCA, M.L. “Business Cycle Analysis with Multivariate Markov Switching Models”, University of Venice Department of Economics Working Papers, 2004, 04, 02. BAKAR ABU, Nor’aznin, Hassan SALLAHUDDIN. “Empirical Evaluation On External Debt Of Malaysia”, International Business And Economic Research Journal, V:7, No 2, 2008, Pp. 95–108.
  3. BALDACCI, Emanuele, HILLMAN Arye L., Kojo NAOKO C. “Growth, Governance, and Fiscal Policy Transmission Channels in Low-Income Countries”, IMF Working Paper, WP 03/237, 2003.
  4. BLAVY, Rodolphe. “Public Debt and Productivity: TheQuest for Growth in Jamaica”, IMF Working Paper,2006, pp. 2-24. Difficult 06/235, BOWEN J., L. “Foreign Aid and Economic Growth: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation”, Asghate Publishing Ltd., 1998.
  5. CARTER C. K., KOHN R. “On Gibbs Sampling for State Space Models”, Biometrika, Vol. 81, No. 3, Aug., 1994, pp. 541-553
  6. CELASUN, Merih, RODRIK, Dani. “Turkish Experience with Debt: Macroeconomic Policy and Performance”, University of Chicago Press, 1987. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c7526.pdf (Erişim Tarihi Mart 2010).
  7. CHECHERITA, Cristina, ROTHER, Philipp, “The Impact of High and Growing Government Debt On Economic Growth an Empirical Investigation for the Euro Area”, European Central Bank Working Paper, No 1237, 2010.
  8. CHEN, Si, External Debt and Growth Dynamics, Dissertations and Theses Collection, Paper 17, 2006, http://ink.library.smu. edu.sg/etd_coll/17. CHOWDHURY, Abdur R., External debt and growth in developing countries: A sensitivity and causal analysis, WIDER Discussion Papers // World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER), No. 2001/95. CLEMENTS, Benedict, BHATTACHARYA, Rina, NGUYEN, Toan QUOC. “External Debt, Public Investment, and Growth in Low-Income Countries” International Monetary Fund, WP/03/249, 2003.
  9. COHEN, Daniel, Private Lending to Sovereign States: A Theoretical Autopsy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
  10. COHEN, Daniel, Low Investment and Large LDC Debt in the 1980s,
  11. American Economic Review, No. 83, pp. 437–49, 1993.
  12. COHEN, Daniel, Growth and External Debt: A New Perspective on the Afri