SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Transportation and Logistics / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Visualization of the Global Supply Chain Research Domain Through Bibliometric Analysis

Bibliyometrik Analiz Yoluyla Küresel Tedarik Zinciri Araştırma Alanının Görselleştirilmesi

Serdar Semih COŞKUN
Halim KAZAN
Pages
125–136
Publication Date
2021-06-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that the sub-topics “greenhouse gas emission”, “corporate social responsibility” and “fair-trade labeling scheme” are new emerging trends in research of global supply chains.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Over the past three decades, it has become clear that supply chain networks have surpassed borders and expanded significantly in the international arena.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The secondary data (including 653 research papers and 18,197 references) used in the analysis was retrieved from the Web of Science database.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that the sub-topics “greenhouse gas emission”, “corporate social responsibility” and “fair-trade labeling scheme” are new emerging trends in research of global supply chains.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Global Supply Chains · Scientometrics · CiteSpace

Abstract

Over the past three decades, it has become clear that supply chain networks have surpassed borders and expanded significantly in the international arena. The effects of this transformation have been the subject of many academic studies . The aim of this study is to understand how the domain knowledge of global supply chain literature has grown and evolved over time. Through co-citation analysis using CiteSpace software, a literature cognitive map has been extracted and hotspot topics, emerging trends and burst cited articles have been discovered in this map. The secondary data (including 653 research papers and 18,197 references) used in the analysis was retrieved from the Web of Science database. The results indicate that the sub-topics “greenhouse gas emission”, “corporate social responsibility” and “fair-trade labeling scheme” are new emerging trends in research of global supply chains. Also, the research focus has been sliding from cost reduction – profit maximization issues towards environmental and social issues under the sustainable supply chain management theory. Our study aims to provide a better understanding of current problems in the global supply chain area and lead to future research.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUN, S. S., KAZAN, H. (2021). Visualization of the Global Supply Chain Research Domain Through Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 125–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/210824

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Al, U., Sezen, U., and Soydal, İ. (2012). “Türkiye’nin bilimsel yayınlarının sosyal ağ analizi yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi,” Ankara: (110K044). Carter, C. R., and Rogers, D. S. (2008). “A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory,” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.
  2. Chen, C., Ibekwe‐SanJuan, F., and Hou, J. (2010). “The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple‐perspective cocitation analysis,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386-1409.
  3. Chen, C., and Leydesdorff, L. (2014). “Patterns of connections and movements in dual‐map overlays: A new method of publication portfolio analysis,” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 334-351.
  4. Chen, C., Song, I.-Y., Yuan, X., and Zhang, J. (2008). “The thematic and citation landscape of data and knowledge engineering (1985–2007),” Data & Knowledge Engineering, 67(2), 234-259.
  5. Colepicolo, E. (2015). “Information reliability for academic research: review and recommendations,” New Library World, 116(11/12), 646-660.
  6. Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J., and Handfield, R. B. (2007). “The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities,” Decision Sciences, 38(1), 131-156.
  7. Crane, D. (1969). “Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the” invisible college” hypothesis,” American Sociological Review, 335-352.
  8. Davis, S. J., and Caldeira, K. (2010). “Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(12), 5687-5692.
  9. Davis, S. J., Peters, G. P., and Caldeira, K. (2011). “The supply chain of CO2 emissions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(45), 18554-18559.
  10. Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R., Timmer, M., and De Vries, G. (2013). “The construction of world input–output tables in the WIOD project,” Economic Systems Research, 25(1), 71-98.
  11. Ding, Y. (2011). “Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks,” Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 187-203.
  12. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., and Sturgeon, T. (2005). “The governance of global value chains,” Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78-104.
  13. Goetschalckx, M., Vidal, C. J., and Dogan, K. (2002). “Modeling and design of global logistics systems: A review of integrated strategic and tactical models and design algor