Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

Robotik Cerrahiye Dönüşümde Laparoskopik ve Açık Cerrahi Geçmişinin Öğrenme Eğrisi Üzerine Etkisi Var mıdır?

Does Prior Laparoscopic and Open Surgery Experience Have Any Impact on Learning Curve in Transition to Robotic Surgery?

Pages
110–113
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analyzing these interactions well will provide valuable information on making the training period of robotic system more efficient.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It has been 15 years since the Food And Drug Administration approved the Da Vinci® robotic surgery system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Robotic applications are being used extensively in urology, particularly in radical prostatectomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analyzing these interactions well will provide valuable information on making the training period of robotic system more efficient.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It has been 15 years since the Food And Drug Administration approved the Da Vinci® robotic surgery system. Robotic applications are being used extensively in urology, particularly in radical prostatectomy. Like all hightech products, this system also has a high cost and a steep learning curve, therefore, preventing it from becoming widespread. There are various studies on the effect of open surgery or laparoscopy experience on the learning curve of robotic surgery. Analyzing these interactions well will provide valuable information on making the training period of robotic system more efficient.

Özet

Da Vinci® robotik cerrahi sistemin Gıda ve İlaç Dairesi onayı almasının üzerinden 15 yıl geçti. Robotik uygulamalar, başta radikal prostatektomi olmak üzere ürolojide gittikçe artan yaygınlıkta kullanılmaya başlamıştır. Tüm ileri teknoloji ürünleri gibi bu sistemin de pahalı olmasının yanında öğrenme süresinin uzun olması, yaygınlaşmasının önündeki en önemli engellerdendir. Uygulayıcının açık cerrahi veya laparoskopi deneyiminin robotik sistemi öğrenme süresini ne şekilde etkilediğiyle ilgili farklı çalışmalar mevcuttur. Bu etkileşimin iyi analiz edilmesi, robotik sisteme ait eğitim sürecinin daha etkinleştirilmesi konusunda değerli bilgiler verecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADAYENER, C., OKUTUCU, T., UYGUR, C. (2016). Robotik Cerrahiye Dönüşümde Laparoskopik ve Açık Cerrahi Geçmişinin Öğrenme Eğrisi Üzerine Etkisi Var mıdır?. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 110–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/210479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1988;35:153-160.
  2. Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Coptcoat MJ, Wickham JE. A surgeon robot prostatectomy--a laboratory evaluation. J Med Eng Technol 1989;13:273- 277. Cadeddu JA, Stoianovici D, Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Stereotactic mechanical percutaneous renal access. J Endourol 1998;12:121-125. Lee DI. Robotic prostatectomy: what we have learned and where we are going. Yonsei Med J 2009;50:177-181.
  3. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997;50:854-857.
  4. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000;163:1643-1649.
  5. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003;170:1738-1741.
  6. Fabrizio MD, Tuerk I, Schellhammer PF. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: decreasing the learning curve using a mentor initiated approach. J Urol 2003;169:2063-2065.
  7. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002;168:945-949.
  8. Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Linsay J. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting--the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 2005;174:269-272.
  9. Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, Burgess SV, Thomas R, Davis R. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2006;49:866-871.
  10. Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 2007;110:1951-1958.
  11. Abdollah F, Sood A, Sammon JD, Hsu L, Beyer B, Moschini M, Gandaglia G, Rogers CG, Haese A, Montorsi F, Graefen M, Briganti A, Menon M. Long- term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer related with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients. Eur Urol 2015;68:497-505.
  12. Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int 2007;99:1109-1112.
  13. Stolzenburg JU, Qazi HA, Holze S, Mende M, Nicolaus M, Franz T, Ho