Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

The effects of the type of anesthesia, age of the patient and prostate volume on the degree of pain perceived during prostate biopsy performed under transrectal ultrasonography guidance

Transrektal ultrasonografi kılavuzluğunda yapılan prostat biyopsisinde anestezi şekli, hasta yaşı ve prostat hacminin ağrı üzerine etkisi

Pages
78–83
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Age of the patient and prostate volume had also no effect on the pain score.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Factors affecting the sense of pain perceived during prostate biopsy performed under transrectal ultrasonography guidance in patients with high prostate specific antigen level or abnormal digital rectal examination findings were investigated in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Four different types of anesthesia were performed on 210 patients in whom prostate biopsy was taken at our clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Age of the patient and prostate volume had also no effect on the pain score.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biyopsi · Anestezi · Ultrasonografi

Abstract

Factors affecting the sense of pain perceived during prostate biopsy performed under transrectal ultrasonography guidance in patients with high prostate specific antigen level or abnormal digital rectal examination findings were investigated in this study. Four different types of anesthesia were performed on 210 patients in whom prostate biopsy was taken at our clinic. Topical anesthesia with perianal lidocaine cream, local block with perianal lidocaine injection, perianal lidocaine cream plus intrarectal lidocaine gel and perianal lidocaine cream plus anal dilation by finger were administered in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Prostate volumes of the patients were measured by transrectal ultrasonography. Pain perceived during biopsy and placement of the transrectal ultrasonography probe into rectum was questionned by visual analog scale. Fifty, 80, 40 and 40 out of 210 patients comprised Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Mean age of the groups was 62.70±9.15, 65.80±7.93, 63.11±8.32 and 62.70±8.48 years; mean prostate volume of the groups was 58.87±29.84, 56.69±28.91, 49.44±22.82 and 61.46±21.84 cc; mean prostate specific antigen level of the groups was 9.74±9.36, 12.0±15.05, 7.71±2.91 and 11.12±13.82 ng/ml, respectively, and no statistically significant differences were observed among the groups (p=0.157, p=0.458 and p=0.547, respectively). Pain perceived during the placement of transrectal ultrasonography probe into rectum was 0.60±0.88, 0.83±1.06, 0.22±0.44 and 0.58±0.84, respectively, and independent from the type of anesthesia (p=0.242). Pain perceived during biopsy was 1.39±0.94, 1.70±0.96, 2.22±1.39 and 1.51±0.99, respectively, and also independent from all four types of anesthesia (p=0.170). There was no correlation between prostate volume and age and pain score (p>0.05). According to our results, neither of four different types of anesthesia we performed during biopsy under the guidance of transrectal ultrasonography showed superiority to others regarding pain score. Age of the patient and prostate volume had also no effect on the pain score.

Özet

Bu çalışmada prostat spesifik antijen yüksekliği veya parmakla rektal incelemede anormallik saptanan ve transrektal ultrasonografi eşliğinde biyopsi alınan hastalarda ağrı duyusuna etki eden faktörler araştırıldı. Kliniğimizde prostat biyopsisi alınan 210 hastaya işlem öncesi 4 farklı anestezi tekniği uygulandı. Birinci gruba perianal topikal lidokainle lokal anestezi, 2. gruba perianal infiltrasyonla lokal blok, 3. gruba perianal lokal lidokaine ilave intrarektal lidokain jel ve 4. gruba perianal lidokaine ilave parmakla anal dilatasyon uygulandı. Hastaların prostat hacimleri transrektal ultrasonografi ile ölçüldü. Vizüel analog skala kullanılarak biyopsi sırasında ve ultrasonografi probunun yerleştirilmesi sırasında oluşan ağrı duyusu sorgulandı. İki yüz on hastadan 50'si birinci grupta, 80'i ikinci grupta, 40'ı üçüncü grupta ve 40'ı da dördüncü grupta yer aldı. Grupların yaş ortalamaları sırasıyla 62.70±9.15, 65.80±7.93, 63.11±8.32 ve 62.70±8.48 yıl, prostat hacimleri sırasıyla 58.87±29.84, 56.69±28.91, 49.44±22.82 ve 61.46±21.84 cc, prostat spesifik antijen değerleri de sırasıyla 9.74±9.36, 12.0±15.05, 7.71±2.91 ve 11.12±13.82 ng/ml idi ve istatistiksel olarak birbirlerinden farklı değildi (sırasıyla p=0.157, p=0.458 ve p=0.547). Ultrasonografi probunun yerleştirilmesi esnasında duyulan ağrı skoru ortalamaları sırasıyla 0.60±0.88, 0.83±1.06, 0.22±0.44, 0.58±0.84 idi ve anestezi şeklinden bağımsızdı (p=0.242). Biyopsi alımı sırasında duyulan ağrı da sırasıyla 1.39±0.94, 1.70±0.96, 2.22±1.39, 1.51±0.99 olarak hesaplandı ve her dört anestezi şeklinden bağımsız olarak bulundu (p=0.170). Yaş ve prostat hacmi ile de ağrı skoru arasında korelasyon saptanmadı (p>0.05). Bizim sonuçlarımıza göre transrektal ultrasonografi eşliğinde biyopsi alınması sırasında uyguladığımız dört farklı anestezi şeklinden hiçbirisinin ağrı skoru açısından diğerlerine üstünlüğü gösterilememiştir. Hasta yaşı ve prostat hacminin de ağrı skoru üzerine etkisi bulunmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATEŞ, F., SOYDAN, H., ŞENKUL, T., AKYOL, İ., ADAYENER, C., BAYKAL, K. (2008). The effects of the type of anesthesia, age of the patient and prostate volume on the degree of pain perceived during prostate biopsy performed under transrectal ultrasonography guidance. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 78–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/225513

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M, McKelvie GB. Multiple transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsies; true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol 1993; 71: 460- 463
  2. Clements R, Aideyan OU, Griffiths GJ, Peeling WB. Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Clin Radiol 1993; 47: 125-126
  3. Seymour H, Perry MJ, Lee-Elliot C, Dundas D, Patel U. Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy. The advantages of periprostatic local anesthesia. BJU Int 2001; 88: 540-544
  4. Walker AE, Schelvan C, Rockall AG, Rickards D, Kellett MJ. Does pericapsular lignocaine reduce pain during transrectal ultrasonography guided biopsy of the prostate? BJU Int 2002; 90: 883-886
  5. Djavan B, Remzi M, Marberger M. When to biopsy and when to stop biopsying. Urol Clin North Am 2003; 30: 253-262
  6. Irani J, Fournier F, Bon D, Gremmo E, Dore B, Aubert J. Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 608-610
  7. Roehl KA, Antenor JA, Catalona WJ. Robustness of free prostate specific antigen measurements to reduce unnecessary biopsies in the 2.6-4.0 ng/ml range. J Urol 2002; 168: 922-925
  8. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157: 199-202
  9. Nova L, Montors F, Consanni P. Results of a prospective randomized study comparing 6, 12 and 18 transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies in patients with elevated PSA, normal DRE and normal prostatic ultrasound. J Urol 1997; 157 (Suppl): 59 (Abstract 226)
  10. Chang SS, Alberts G, Wells N, Smith JA Jr, Cookson MS. Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy: results of a prospective double-blind randomized trial. J Urol 2001; 166: 2178-2180
  11. Aus G, Hermansson CG, Hugosson J, Pedersen KV. Transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate: complications and acceptance by patients. Br J Urol 1993; 71: 457-459
  12. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudhara R, Shinohara K. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 1996; 155: 607-609
  13. Alavi A, Soloway MS, Vaidya A, Lynne CM, Gheiler EL. Local anesthesia for ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial comparing 2 methods. J Urol 2001; 166: 1343-1345
  14. Wu CL, Carter HB, Naqibuddin M, Fleisher LA. Effect of local anesthetics on patient recovery after transrectal biopsy.