Journals / JAREM / 2014 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

The Evaluation of Patient with Diagnosis of Ectopic Pregnancy in Our Clinic

Kliniğimizde Ektopik Gebelik Tanısı Alan Hastaların İncelenmesi

Journal
JAREM
Pages
93–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The treatment of ectopic pregnancy should be individualized, and all treatment procedures and future reproductive performance must be argued with patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To retrospectively evaluate risk factors, demographic features, findings, and treatment aspects in women hospitalized in our clinic with ectopic pregnancy.Methods: A total of 42 women who were diagnosed as having an ectopic pregnancy at Kafkas University Medicine Faculty Health Research and Practice Center between March 2013 and May 2014 were enrolled in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During investigation of the records, age, obstetric history, last menstrual period, complaint, physical signs, risk factors, contraception method, ?-HCG levels, fetal cardiac activity, and diameter of the ectopic mass in the transvaginal ultrasonography and treatment methods were evaluated.Results: The mean age of the patients was 30.6 (20±44) years; 11 patients applied with pain (26%), 5 (12%) applied with delay of menstrual bleeding, and 8 (19%) applied with vaginal bleeding.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The treatment of ectopic pregnancy should be individualized, and all treatment procedures and future reproductive performance must be argued with patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively evaluate risk factors, demographic features, findings, and treatment aspects in women hospitalized in our clinic with ectopic pregnancy.Methods: A total of 42 women who were diagnosed as having an ectopic pregnancy at Kafkas University Medicine Faculty Health Research and Practice Center between March 2013 and May 2014 were enrolled in this study. During investigation of the records, age, obstetric history, last menstrual period, complaint, physical signs, risk factors, contraception method, ?-HCG levels, fetal cardiac activity, and diameter of the ectopic mass in the transvaginal ultrasonography and treatment methods were evaluated.Results: The mean age of the patients was 30.6 (20±44) years; 11 patients applied with pain (26%), 5 (12%) applied with delay of menstrual bleeding, and 8 (19%) applied with vaginal bleeding. Mean ?-HCG level was 3541 mIU/mL . Mean gestational age was 6 (6±1.8). With the transvaginal ultrasonography, ectopic foci were detected in 27 (64.2%) patients. The mean diameter of ectopic foci was 37 mm . In 4 (9.6%) patients, fetal cardiac activity was obtained. As we looked to treatment procedures, 33 (78.5%) patients had surgery, 4 (9.5%) were treated medically, and 5 (12%) patients were managed expectantly. Among 33 patients who had surgery, 26 (78.8%) patients had laparoscopic surgery, and 7 (21.2%) had a laparotomy. All patients were discharged with complete recovery. No complications were observed.Conclusion: Ectopic pregnancy is still an important issue because of the high mortality, morbidity, and influenced on fertility. The treatment of ectopic pregnancy should be individualized, and all treatment procedures and future reproductive performance must be argued with patients.

Özet

Amaç: Ektopik gebelik nedeniyle kliniğimize yatırılan hastaların demografik bulgularının, risk faktörleri, tanı bulguları ve tedavi yöntemlerinin retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi.Yöntemler: Bu çalışma Kafkas Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Sağlık Araştırma ve Uygulama Hastanesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniğinde Mart 2013Mayıs 2014 tarihleri arasında Ektopik gebelik tanısı ile tedavi edilen 42 hastanın tıbbı kayıtlarının retrospektif olarak incelenmesi ile yapıldı. Kayıtların incelenmesi sırasında olguların yaşları, obstetrik öyküleri, son adet tarihleri, başvuru nedenleri, muayene bulguları, risk faktörleri, korunma yöntemleri, ?-hCG değerleri, Transvaginal ultrasonografide (TV-USG) odak varlığı, büyüklüğü, fetal kardiyak aktivitenin varlığı ve uygulanan tedavi yöntemleri değerlendirildiBulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 30,6 yıl idi. On bir (26%) hasta ağrı, beş (%12) hasta adet rötarı, 8 (%19) hasta vajinal kanama şikayeti ile başvurdu. Ortalama ?-hCG değerleri 3541 mIU/mL olarak bulundu. Ortalama gebelik haftaları 6 (6±1,8) hafta, TV-USG 27 hasta da ektopik odak izlendi. Ektopik odak büyüklerinin ortalaması 37 mm olarak hesaplandı. Dört (%9,6) hastada fetal kalp aktivitesi mevcuttu. Hastalara uygulanan tedavi yöntemine bakılacak olursa 5 (%12) hastaya ekspektan, 4 (%9,5) hastaya medikal tedavi, 33 (%78,5) hastaya cerrahi tedavi uygulandı. Cerrahi uygulanan 33 hastanın 26'sına (%78,8) laparoskopi yöntemi, 7 hastaya (%21,2) laparatomi yöntemi uygulandı. Tüm hastalar şifa ile taburcu edildi. Mortalite gözlenmedi.Sonuç: Ektopik gebelik fertiliteyi etkilemesi, mortalite ve morbiditesinin yüksek olması nedeniyle günümüzde hala önemini koruyan bir hastalıktır. Ektopik gebelik tedavisi hastaya yönelik olarak bireyselleştirilmeli, gelecekteki reprodüktif performans ve tedavi seçenekleri hastayla tartışılmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GENÇDAL, S., BOZKURT, M., PAŞAOĞLU, H., ÜLKER, K., KARASU, Y., DEDE, F. S. (2014). The Evaluation of Patient with Diagnosis of Ectopic Pregnancy in Our Clinic. JAREM, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 93–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/210436

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Farquhar CM. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 2005
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL. Ectopic pregnancy. In Williams Obstetrics
  3. edition, 2005, New York,The McGraw Hill Company: 253-73. 3. Buckley RG, King KJ, Disney JD, Gorman JD. History and physical examination to estimate the risk of ectopic pregnancy: Validation of a clinical prediction model. Ann Emerg Med 1999
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Dart RG, Kaplan B, Varaklis K. Predictive value of history and physical examination in patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med 1999
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Pulkkinen MO, Talo A. Tubal physiologic consideration in ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gyneco 1987
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Westrom L. Influence of sexually transmitted diseases on sterility and ectopic pregnancy. ActaEurFertil 1985
  7. Musa J, Daru PH, Mutihir JT, Ujah IA. Ectopic Pregnancy in Jos Northern Nigeria: prevalence and impact on subsequent fertility. Niger J Med 2009
  8. Condous G. Ectopic pregnancy-risk factors and diagnosis. Aust Fam Physician 2006
  9. Medical Management of EctopicPregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 94: 2008
  10. Storeide O, Veholmen M, Eide M, Bergsjo P, Sandvei R. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy in Hordaland Country, Norway 1976- 1993. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Alsuleiman SA, Grimes EM. Ectopic Pregnancy: a review of 147 cases. J Reprod Med 1982
  12. Doyle MB, De Cherney AH, Diamond MP. Epidemiology and etiology of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1991
  13. Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, Pouly JL, Fernandez H, Gerbaud L, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 2003
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Kazandi M, Turan V. Ectopic pregnancy
  15. risk factors and comparison of intervention success rates in tubal ectopic pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2011
  16. Condous G, Okaro E, Khalid A. The accurancy of transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy prior to surgery. Hum Reprod 2005
  17. [CrossRef] 16. Shalev E, Peleg D, Tsabari A, Romano S, Bustan M. Spontaneous resolution of ectopic tubal pregnancy: natural history. Fertil Steril 1995
  18. Trio D, Strobelt N, Picciolo C, Lapinski RH, Ghidini A. Prognostic factors for successful expectant management of ectopic pregnan