Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Should we measure pelvic incidence via manually or computer assisted?

Pelvik insidans elle mi, bilgisayar yardımlı mı ölçmeliyiz?

Pages
183–187
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found to be moderate to strong agreement by manual way.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To show superiority of computer assisted measurement of pelvic incidence over measurement made by manually.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study Design: Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiograph of entire spinal colon of 30 patients aged between 20-40 years-old included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found to be moderate to strong agreement by manual way.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To show superiority of computer assisted measurement of pelvic incidence over measurement made by manually. Study Design: Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiograph of entire spinal colon of 30 patients aged between 20-40 years-old included in the study. Sacral slope, pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt were evaluated to measure sagittal balance. The measurements were done by both computer assisted and manually by two spinal surgeons and one orthopedic surgeon. Statistically, Intraclass correlation coefficent method is used. Results: Almost perfect agreement is found between surgeons by computer assisted measurements. It was found to be moderate to strong agreement by manual way. Conclusion: The use of computer assisted programs will improve accuracy of measurement especially in measurements which is difficult to calculate such as sagittal balance.

Özet

Amaç: El ile ya da bilgisayar yardımlı yapılan pelvik insidans ölçümlerinin birbirine üstünlüğünün karşılaştırılması. Hastalar ve Metod: Ayakta tüm spinal kolon anteroposterior ve lateral radyografileri olan otuz 20-40 yaş arası yetişkin örneklem olarak seçildi. Sagital balans için sakral slop açısı, pelvik insidans ve pelvik tilt açıları ölçüldü. 2 spinal cerrah ve 1 ortopedi uzmanı tüm ölçümleri yaptı. Ölçümler hem el ile röntgen üzerinden, hem bilgisayar yardımlı yapıldı. İstatistik olarak grup içi korelasyon katsayısı (Intraclass correlation coefficent ) uygulandı. Bulgular: Cerrahların bilgisayar yardımı ile yaptığı ölçümlerde mükemmele yakın uyum bulunurken el ile yaptıkları ölçümlerde orta ya da güçlü derecede uyum bulundu. Sonuç: Özellikle sagittal balans gibi nispeten zor açıların hesaplanmasında bilgisayar yardımlı programların kullanılması ölçüm doğruluğunu arttırır.

🔖

Cite This Article

OLTULU, İ., MALKOÇ, M., İŞYAR, M., YALÇIN, S., ÖRMECİ, T., UĞRAŞ, A. (2014). Should we measure pelvic incidence via manually or computer assisted?. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 183–187. https://ajindex.com/articles/209963

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P. Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degen- erative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 2007; 16(9): 1459-1467
  2. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H. Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis us- ing shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005; 18(1): 40-47
  3. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouil- leseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval- Beaupère G, Pélissier J. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 2006; 15(4): 415-422
  4. Corona J, Sanders JO, Luhmann SJ, Diab M, Vitale MG. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile id- iopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 2012; 94-A(12): e86
  5. During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W, Beeker TW, Crowe A. Toward standards for posture. Postural charac- teristics of the lower back system in normal and patho- logic conditions. Spine 1985; 10(1): 83-87
  6. Duval-Beaupère G, Schmidt C, Cosson P. A bary- centremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pel- vis: the conditions required for an economic standing po- sition. Ann Biomed Eng 1992; 20(4): 451-462
  7. Gertzbein SD, Harris MB. Wedge osteotomy for the correction of post-traumatic kyphosis. A new tech- nique and a report of three cases. Spine 1992; 17(3): 374- 979
  8. Jackson RP, McManus AC. Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volun- teers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 1994; 19(14): 1611-1618
  9. Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, Hales C. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine 1998; 23(16): 1750-1767
  10. Jackson RP, Phipps T, Hales C, Surber J. Pelvic lor- dosis and alignment in spondylolisthesis. Spine 2003; 28(2): 151-160
  11. Jang JS, Lee SH, Min JH, Maeng DH. Changes in sagittal alignment after restoration of lower lumbar lor- dosis in patients with degenerative flat back syndrome. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7(4): 387-392
  12. Kobayashi T, Atsuta Y, Matsuno T, Takeda N. A longitudinal study of congruent sagittal spinal alignment in an adult cohort. Spine 2004; 29(6): 671-676
  13. Korovessis JP. Letter. Jackson PR, et al. Congruent spinopelvic alignment on