Journals / JAREM / 2014 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Tırnak batması cerrahi tedavisinde winograd yöntemi ile yapılan kısmi matriks eksizyonu sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi

An evaluation of partial matrix excision with winograd method for the surgical treatment of ıngrown toenails

Journal
JAREM
Pages
7–11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Winograd’s partial matrix excision method is a beneficial surgical procedure for ingrown toenail, resulting in low recurrence and high satisfaction rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The most frequent nail pathology of the hallux is the ingrown toenail.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Winograd’s partial toenail excision was performed on 239 patients (127 males, 112 females; mean age 37.4 years) with an ingrown toenail.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Winograd’s partial matrix excision method is a beneficial surgical procedure for ingrown toenail, resulting in low recurrence and high satisfaction rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The most frequent nail pathology of the hallux is the ingrown toenail. In our study, we evaluated Winograd’s partial matrix excision method as a treatment for unilateral ingrown hallux toenail. Methods: Winograd’s partial toenail excision was performed on 239 patients (127 males, 112 females; mean age 37.4 years) with an ingrown toenail. Primary patient complaints included a painful hallux toenail, discharge, nail deformation, and difficulty walking. According to the Heifetz staging system, there were 62 patients evaluated as Stage l, 96 as Stage ll, and 81 as Stage lll. A total of 174 (74%) patients had discharge from infection. In infected cases, an antibiotic was administered until inflammatory signs and discharged ceased, at which time surgical treatment was performed. Patients’ duration to return to daily living and work, recurrence ratio, satisfaction, and cosmetic issues were evaluated. The mean follow-up time was 27 months (range: 14-45 months). Results: Patients returned to daily living in 10-15 days (mean 11.3) and to work in 8.7 days (range: 6-13 days). A total of 230 patients (96.3%) were satisfied with the procedure, and 231 patients (96.6%) were satisfied with the cosmetic results. Nine patients were dissatisfied with the surgical outcome, and eight patients who experienced recurrence were dissatisfied with the cosmetic results. None of the patients experienced deep tissue infections or neurovascular complications. Conclusion: Winograd’s partial matrix excision method is a beneficial surgical procedure for ingrown toenail, resulting in low recurrence and high satisfaction rates.

Özet

Amaç: Tırnak batması, toplumda sık görülen ve en sık tırnak hastalığıdır. Bu çalışmada, ayak baş parmağına tek taraflı tırnak batması nedeniyle Winograd yöntemiyle kısmi matriks eksizyonu yapılan hastalarda tedavi sonuçları değerlendirildi. Yöntemler: Tırnak batması nedeniyle 239 hastaya (127 erkek, 112 kadın; ort. yaş 37,4) Winograd prosedürüne uygun olarak kısmi matriks eksizyonu uygulandı. Hastaların temel şikayetleri ayak baş parmağına ağrı, akıntı, tırnakta şekil bozukluğu ve yürüme güçlüğü idi. Heifetz’in tırnak batması evrelendirmesine göre 62 hasta evre I, 96 hasta evre II, 81 hasta evre III olarak değerlendirildi. Yüz yetmiş sekiz (%74) hastada enfeksiyon zemininde aktif akıntı vardı. Enfekte olgularda enflamasyon bulguları ve akıntı ortadan kalkıncaya kadar antibiyoterapi uygulandı ve sonrasında cerrahi tedavi yapıldı. Hastaların günlük hayat ve işe dönüş zamanları, nüks gelişme oranı, hasta memnuniyeti ve kozmetik sorunlar açısından değerlendirildi. Ortalama takip süresi 27 ay (dağılım 14-45 ay) idi. Bulgular: Dokuz hastada (%3,7) nüks görüldü. Ortalama nüks gelişim süresi 5,6 aydı (dağılım 2-9 ay). Hastalar ortalama 6,7 günde (dağılım 3-11 gün) günlük aktivitelerine geri döndü. İşe dönüş süresi ortalama 10,2 gün (dağılım 7-16 gün) bulundu. İkiyüzotuz (%96,3) hasta yapılan müdahaleden memnundu. İki yüz otuz bir (%96,6) hastada kozmetik olarak memnundu. Nüks gelişen hastaların dokuzu cerrahiden ve sekizi ise kozmetik açıdan memnun kalmadığını bildirdi. Hastaların hiçbirinde derin doku enfeksiyonu veya nörovasküler komplikasyon gelişmedi. Sonuç: Tırnak batması tedavisinde Winograd yöntemiyle yapılan kısmi matriks eksizyonu nüks oranı düşük ve hasta memnuniyet oranı yüksek bir tedavi yöntemidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, O., MAHİROĞULLARI, M., MUTLU, S., ÇERÇİ, H., ŞEKER, A., MUTLU, H. (2014). Tırnak batması cerrahi tedavisinde winograd yöntemi ile yapılan kısmi matriks eksizyonu sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. JAREM, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 7–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/209871

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Murtagh J. Patient education. Ingrowing toenails. Australian family physician 1993; 22: 206. 2.Siegle RJ, Stewart R. Recalcitrant ingrowing nails: surgical approaches,” Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology 1992; 744-52. [CrossRef] 3.Byrne DS, Caldwell D. Phenol cauterization for ingrowing toenails: A re- view of five years’ experience. British Journal of Surgery 1989; 76: 598-9. [CrossRef] 4.Herold N, Houshian S, Riegels-Nielsen P. A prospective compari- son of wedge matrix resection with nail matrix phenolization for the treatment of ingrown toenail. J Foot Ankle Surg 2001; 40: 390-5. [CrossRef] 5. Aydin N, Kocaoğlu B, Esemenli T. Partial removal of nail matrix in the treatment of ingrowing toe nail. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008; 42: 174-7. [CrossRef] 6. Heidelbaugh JJ, Lee H. Management of the ingrown toenail. Am Fam Physician 2009; 79: 303-8. 7. Chapeskie H, Kovac JR. Case Series: Soft-tissue nail-fold excision: a definitive treatment for ingrown toenails. Can J Surg 2010; 53: 282-6. 8. Rounding C, Bloomfield S. Surgical treatments for ingrowing toe- nails. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 18: CD001541. 9. Vaccari S, Dika E, Balestri R, Rech G, Piraccini BM,Fanti PA. Partial excision of matrix and phenolic ablation for the treatment of ingrow- ing toenail: a 36-month follow-up of 197 treated patients Dermatol Surg 2010; 36: 1288-93. [CrossRef] 10. Kruijff S, van Det RJ, van der Meer GT, van den Berg IC, van der Palen J, Geelkerken RH. Partial matrix excision or orthonyxia for in- growing toenails.J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206: 148-53. [CrossRef] 11. The Foot and Ankle, Disorders of Nails and Skin, In: Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. 11. Edition,
  2. Volume four, Mosby-Elsevier; 2008.p.4762-3. 12. Shaikh FM, Jafri M, Giri SK, Keane R. Efficacy of wedge resection with phenolization in the treatment of ingrowing toenails. J Am Po- diatr Med Assoc 2008; 98: 118-22. [CrossRef] 13. Ikard RW. Onychocryptosis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187: 96-102. [CrossRef] 14. Lathrop RG. Ingrowing toenails: Causes and treatment. Cutis 1977; 20: 19-22. 15. Rounding C, Bloomfield S. Surgical treatments for ingrowing toe- nails. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 18: CD001541. 16. Chapeskie H. Ingrown toenail or overgrown toe skin? Alternative treatment for onychocryptosis. Can Fam Physician 2008; 54: 1561-2. 17. Baran R, Haneke E, Richert B. Pincer nails: Definition and surgical treatment. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 261-6. [CrossRef] 18. De Berker DA, Baran R. Disorders of nails