Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1

Microcephaly Agent of Zika Virus and Unknowns by Healthcare Personnel

Pages
89–92
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The ministry of health and universities should provide the appropriate training to healthcare personnel.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The Zika virus is an important viral agent that presents the risk of pandemic disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 290 healthcare personnel from a secondary and a tertiary health institution were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The ministry of health and universities should provide the appropriate training to healthcare personnel.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The Zika virus is an important viral agent that presents the risk of pandemic disease. Infection with the virus can cause microcephaly in infants, as well as other potential effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of knowledge about the Zika virus among healthcare personnel in Turkey. Materials and Methods: A total of 290 healthcare personnel from a secondary and a tertiary health institution were included in this study. The data were collected using a survey form prepared by the researchers and statistically analyzed. Results: Among the respondents, there was awareness of the Zika virus in 68.7%, 75.0%, 75.9%, and 77.0% of women, individuals over 35 years of age, doctors, and those with a healthcare career of at least 10 years, respectively. The results revealed that 58.9% knew the true means of transmission, 36.0% were aware of prevention efforts, 41.1% were familiar with potential complications, 0.5% reported knowledge of treatment, and 16.8% responded correctly regarding the availability of a vaccine. The primary source of information about the virus was TV and radio for 68.5% of the participants, and 3.6% cited scientific papers. Conclusion: The Zika virus is a potential pandemic agent. The knowledge level of the healthcare personnel studied was insufficient to meet such a challenge. The ministry of health and universities should provide the appropriate training to healthcare personnel.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZLAK, Ç. E. B., BOZKURT, H. B. (2020). Microcephaly Agent of Zika Virus and Unknowns by Healthcare Personnel. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1, 89–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/209742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ministry of Health Public Health Agency of Turkey. Vector and Zoonotic diseases department of documents 2016. Available from: URL: https:// hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/zoonotik-vektorel-hastaliklar-db/ zoonotik-hastaliklar/6-Zika-Virus-Hastaligi/6-Rehbler/4-_Zika_Virus_ Hastaligi_Vaka_Yonetim_Rehberi.pdf
  2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, An agency of the European Union. Rapid Risk Assessment: Zika virus infection outbreak, Brazil and the Pacific region, 26 May 2015. Available from: URL:
  3. Staples JE, Dziuban JE, Fischer M, Cragan JD, Rasmussen SA, Cannon MJ, et al. Interim Guidelines for the Evaluation and Testing of Infants with Possible Congenital Zika Virus Infection — United States 2016. MMWR 2016; 65(3): 63–7
  4. Duffy MR, Chen TH, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL, Lanciotti RS, et al. Zika Virus Outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2536–43
  5. Waggoner JJ, Pinsky BA. Zika Virus: Diagnostics for an Emerging Pandemic Threat. J Clin Microbiol 2016; 54(4): 860–7
  6. Hayes EB. Zika Virus Outside Africa. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2009; 15(9): 1347–50. Available from: URL: http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/ eid/article/15/9/09-0442_article
  7. Foy BD, Kobylinski KC, Chilson Foy JL, Blitvich BJ, Travassos da Rosa A, Haddow AD, et al. Probable non-vector-borne transmission of Zika virus, Colorado, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 2011; 17(5): 880–2
  8. Aryal S. Zika Virus- Structure, Genome, Symptoms, Transmission, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis. 2015 November 5. Available from: URL:
  9. Joob B, Wiwanitkit V. Zika virus infection and dengue: A new problem in diagnosis in a dengue-endemic area. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2015; 8(4): 145–6
  10. Zanluca C, Dos Santos CN. Zika virus - an overview. Microbes Infect 2016; 18(5): 295–301
  11. Gupta N, Randhawa RK1, Thakar S, Bansal M, Gupta P, Arora V. Knowledge regarding Zika virus infection among dental practitioners of tricity area (Chandigarh, Panchkula and Mohali), India. Niger Postgrad Med J 2016; 23(1): 33–7
  12. Sahiner F. Global Spread of Zika Virus Epidemic: Current Knowledges and Uncertainties. Mikrobiyol Bul 2016; 50(2): 333–51
  13. Schaffner F, Mathis A. Dengue and dengue vectors in the WHO European Region: past, present, and scena