SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Individualization Types and Identity Status in Transition to Adulthood: College Students and "Forgotten-Half"

Yetilkinliğe Geçişte Bireyleşme Türleri ve Kimlik Statüleri: Üniversite Öğrencileri ve "Unutulan Yarı"

Hasan ATAK
Emine GÜL KAPÇY
Figen ÇOK
Pages
71–82
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The results demonstrated that there weretwo individualization types namely developing individualization and default individualization during transitionto adulthood, and identity status differed according toindividualization types.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Identity development has long beenacknowledged as a central psychosocial task for adolescents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, the first aim of the presentstudy is to investigate individualization types in emerging adulthood and its relationship with identity status.Method: A total of 700 individuals from two differenteducational background participated in the study (university students n=343 and "forgotten half" n=357).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The results demonstrated that there weretwo individualization types namely developing individualization and default individualization during transitionto adulthood, and identity status differed according toindividualization types.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Identity development has long beenacknowledged as a central psychosocial task for adolescents. In recent years it is suggested that identity development starts during adolescent years but it has beencompleted throughout "emerging adulthood" period.Although the relationship between identity status andvarious psycho-social variables have been well-documented the relationship between identity status withthose of individualization during emerging adulthoodhas not been studied. Thus, the first aim of the presentstudy is to investigate individualization types in emerging adulthood and its relationship with identity status.Method: A total of 700 individuals from two differenteducational background participated in the study (university students n=343 and "forgotten half" n=357). Ofthese 37.9 % (n=265) were male and 62.1% (n=435)were female. The age of the participants ranged from 19to 26 with a mean of 23.5 (SD=1.4). "The Ego IdentityStatus Scale" and "Multi-Measure Agentic PersonalityScale" were utilized. Frequency and percent analysis, ttest, MANOVA and cluster analyses were the primary statistics. Results: The results demonstrated that there weretwo individualization types namely developing individualization and default individualization during transitionto adulthood, and identity status differed according toindividualization types. Conclusion: The results are discussed in relation to the contribution of individualizationtypes to the identity status for Turkish emerging adults

Özet

Amaç: Erikson'dan itibaren ergenli?in en önemlipsikososyal görevinin "kimlik" olarak kabul edilmesinekar?yn, özellikle son yyllarda ayry bir geli?imsel dönemoldu?u iddia edilen "beliren yeti?kinlik" döneminin temelgörevinin "kimlik" olabilece?i ve kimlik geli?iminin aslyndaergenlikte ba?layyp bu dönemde tamamlandy?y önesürülmektedir. Bu çaly?manyn temel amacy, belirenyeti?kinlik döneminde bireyle?me türlerinin varly?ynyincelemek ve kimlik statülerinin bireyle?me türlerine görefarklyla?yp farklyla?mady?yny incelemektir. Yöntem: Çaly?maya 19-26 ya? araly?ynda bulunan toplam 700 genç(üniversite e?itimi alan 343 ve almayan 357 birey)katylmy?tyr. Katylymcylaryn %37.9'u erkek (n=265), %62.1'i(n=435) kadyndyr; ya? ortalamasy 23.5'dir (SS=1.4).Ara?tyrmada "Benlik Kimli?i Statüleri Ölçe?i" ve "ÇokYönlü Eylemli Ki?ilik Ölçe?i" kullanylmy?tyr. Frekans veyüzde analizi, t-testi, MANOVA ve küme analizi verilerinanalizinde yararlanylan temel istatistiklerdir. Bulgular:Sonuçlar, yeti?kinli?e geçi? döneminde geli?imsel vestandart bireyle?me olarak adlandyrylan her iki bireyle?metürünün de deneyimlendi?ini göstermektedir. Ayryca,kimlik statülerinin geli?imsel ve standart bireyle?me türlerine göre farklyla?ty?y bulunmu?tur. Sonuç: Bulgular,bireyle?menin, beliren yeti?kinlik dönemindeki Türkgençlerinin kimlik biçimlenme sürecine katkysy ba?lamynda tarty?ylmy?tyr

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAK, H., KAPÇY, E. G., ÇOK, F. (2013). Individualization Types and Identity Status in Transition to Adulthood: College Students and "Forgotten-Half". Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 71–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/208876

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adams GR, Jones RM (1983) Female adolescents identity development: age comparision and perceived child rearing. Dev Psychol, 19: 249-256.
  2. Archer SL (1985) Career and/or family the identity process for adolescent girls. Youth & Society, 16: 289-314.
  3. Arnett JJ (2000) Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol, 55:469- 480. Arnett JJ (2004) Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York, Oxford University Press.
  4. Atak H (2010) Yeti?kinli?e geçi?te kimlik biçimlenmesi ve eylemlilik (agency): Bireyle?me sürecinde iki geli?imsel kaynak (Doktora Tezi), Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi E?itim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Atak H, Çok F (2007) Emerging adulthood and perceived adult- hood in Turkey, 3rd Conference on Emerging Adulthood, Tucson, AZ, USA. Ba?kan T (2000) Ruhsal sorunu olan ergenlerde kimlik duygusu: Kar?yla?tyrmaly bir çaly?ma. Yayymlanmamy? Typta Uzmanlyk Tezi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Typ Fakültesi. Bennion LD, Adams GR (1986) Arevision of the extended ver- sion of the Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status: An iden- tity instrument for use with late adolescents. J Adolesc Res, 1:183-198.
  5. Buss DM, Barnes ML (1986) Preferences in human mate selec- tion. J Pers Soc Psychol, 50: 559-570.
  6. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sci- ences, 2. Basky, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Côté JE (1997) An empirical test of the identity capital model. J Adolesc, 20:421-437. Côté JE (2000) Arrested adulthood: The changing nature of maturity and identity. New York, New York University Press. Côté JE (2002) The role of identity capital in the transition to adulthood: The individualization thesis examined. J Youth Stud, 5:117-134. Côté JE, Levine CG (2002) Identity formation, agency, and cul- ture: A social psychological synthesis. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum. Côté JE, Schwartz SJ (2002) Comparing psychological and soci- ological approaches to identity: Identity status, identity capital, and the individualization process. J Adolesc, 25:571-586. Çuhadaro?lu F (1999) Identity confusion and depression in groups of adolescence having psychiatric and physical symp- toms, Turk J Pediatr, 41: 73-79.
  7. Dereboy YF, Dereboy Ç, Co?kun A ve ark. (1994) Özde?er duy- gusu, öz imgesi ve kimlik duygusu-II: Bir kimlik duygusu de?er- lendirme aracyna do?ru-ön çaly?ma. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sa?ly?y Dergisi, 1: 61-69.
  8. Dereboy F, Çelen N (2012) Türk Gençlerinde Kimlik Geli?imi ve Kimlik Soru