Journals / İlköğretim Online / 2011 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Gradual transition to adulthood: Is emerging adulthood the only main road?

Yetişkinliğe Aşamalı Geçiş: Beliren Yetişkinlik Tek Bir Ana Yol Mu?

Pages
51–67
Publication Date
2011-06-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings were discussed in the context of emerging adulthood theory, and the concept of “recentering”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Emerging adulthood is a new life period which considers between the ages 18-29.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected 453 people who are between the ages 19-26.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings were discussed in the context of emerging adulthood theory, and the concept of “recentering”.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Beliren Yetişkinlik · Yetişkinliğe Geçiş · Evre

Abstract

Emerging adulthood is a new life period which considers between the ages 18-29. In human development, the most important criteria is “quantitative change” for existing stage or substage. In this context, it is necessitate to investigate whether this period has substages or not. Does emerging adulthood have substages? Basically, this descriptive study aims to answer these questions. Data were collected 453 people who are between the ages 19-26. The Inventory of Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood (Reiffman, Arnett and Colwell, 2003) was used for gathering data. In analysing data, One-way ANOVA test was used. There are significant relationships between total score of scale and age and subscales and age. It seems there are three substages which are might called “pseudo emerging adulthood”, “middle emerging adulthood”, and “adulthoid”. Findings were discussed in the context of emerging adulthood theory, and the concept of “recentering”.

Özet

Beliren yetişkinlik, 18-29 yaş arasını kapsayan yeni bir yaşam dönemidir. Gelişimde, evre ya da alt evrelerden söz etmek için en önemli ölçüt “niteliksel değişimdir”. Niteliksel değişim bağlamında, beliren yetişkinlik döneminin alt evrelerinin olup olmadığının incelenmesi bu alana katkı sağlayabilir. Acaba beliren yetişkinliğin alt dönemleri var mıdır? Bu çalışma, en temel anlamıyla bu sorulara cevap verme amacını taşımaktadır. Bu araştırma, kesitsel araştırma düzeninin kullanıldığı betimsel bir çalışmadır. Veriler 19-26 yaş arası 453 beliren yetişkinden elde edilmiştir. Verilerin toplanması için, Beliren Yetişkinliğin Boyutları Envanteri (Reiffman, Arnett ve Colwell, 2003) kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde tek yönlü varyans analizi kullanılmıştır. Ölçekten ve alt ölçeklerden alınan toplam puanlarda yaşa göre anlamlı fark bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar beliren yetişkinliğin “yalancı beliren yetişkinlik”, “orta beliren yetişkinlik” ve “yetişkinimsi” olarak adlandırılabilecek üç alt evreden oluştuğuna işaret etmektedir ve beliren yetişkinlik kuramı ve “yeniden merkezleşme” kavramı bağlamında tartışılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAK, H. (2011). Gradual transition to adulthood: Is emerging adulthood the only main road?. İlköğretim Online, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 51–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/999072

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aries, D. F., & Hernandez, A. M. (2007). Emerging adulthood in Mexican and Spanish youth: Theories and realities. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22 (5), 476-503.
  2. Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
  3. Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Arnett, J.J. (2006a). Emerging adulthood in Europe: A response to Bynner. Journal of Youth Studies, 9, 111- 123. Arnett, J. J. (2006b). Suffering, selfish, slackers? Myths and reality about emerging adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 36, 23-29.
  5. Arnett, J.J. (2007a). Emerging Adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for?. Child Development Perspectives. 1 (2), 68-73.
  6. Arnett, J.J. (2007b). Emerging adulthood, a 21st century theory: A rejoinder to Hendry and Kloep. Child Development Perspectives. 1 (2), 80-82.
  7. Arnett, J. J, & Eisenberg, N. (2007). Introduction to the special section: Emerging adulthood around the World. Child Development Perspectives. 1(2), 66-67.
  8. Arnett, J.J., & Jensen, L.A. (2002). A congregation of one: Individualized religious beliefs among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17, 451-467.
  9. Arnett, J. J., Ramos, K.D., Jensen, L.A. (2001). Ideological views in emerging adulthood: Balancing autonomy and community. Journal of Adult Development, Vol. 8, No. 2. Atak, H. (2009). Beliren yetişkinlikte beş büyük kişilik özelliği ve yalnızlık, X. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi, 21-23 Ekim 2009,
  10. Çukurova Üniversitesi,
  11. Adana. Atak, H. & Çok, F. Emerging adulthood and perceived adulthood in Turkey, 3rd Conference on Emerging Adulthood, Tucson, AZ, USA, 15-16 February 2007.
  12. Atak, H. & Çok, F. (2008). The Turkish version of inventory of the dimensions of emerging adulthood (The IDEA), International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Volume 2, Number 3, 148-154.
  13. Barker, E. T., & Galambos, N. L. (2005). Adolescents’ ımplicit theories of maturity: Ages of adulthood, freedom, and fun. Journal of Adolescent Research. 20 (5), 557-576.
  14. Bennett, C. M. & Baird A. A. (2006). Anatomical changes in the emerging adult brain: A voxel-based morphometry study. Human Brain Mapping. 27(9):766-777.
  15. Blinn-Pike, L., Worthy, S. L., & Jonkman J. N. (2007) Disordered gambling among college students: A Meta- analytic synthesis. Journal of Gambling Studies; 23: 175-183.
  16. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak E