SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Karadeniz Araştırmaları / 2012 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 35

The Politicization of Alevism and Alevi Opening I: Historical Roots

Aleviliğin Siyasallaşması ve Alevi Açılımı I: Tarihsel Kökler

YAHYA KEMAL TAŞTAN
Pages
1–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This essay is formed of five sections and in the first section, historical process is being mentioned from beginning of Alevism to national struggle.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, an Alevi awakening is mentioned with version names as the politicization of Alevism and the formation of Alevi ethnic identity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This movement has historical process which reached as near past as far past too.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This essay is formed of five sections and in the first section, historical process is being mentioned from beginning of Alevism to national struggle.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kızılbaşlık · Alevilik · Bektaşilik

Abstract

Today, an Alevi awakening is mentioned with version names as the politicization of Alevism and the formation of Alevi ethnic identity. This movement has historical process which reached as near past as far past too. The formation of Alevism has emerged with power and opposition-based from past to now. In this process, the remarkable point is that definitions have been described as power-based. Alevism has to position against this fact. Adapting the name Alevi and abandoning the name, Kizilbash is the indicator of this fact. This essay is formed of five sections and in the first section, historical process is being mentioned from beginning of Alevism to national struggle.

Özet

Günümüzde Alevî hareketinin siyasallaşması, Alevî etnik kimliğinin oluşumu gibi değişik adlarla ifade edilen bir Alevi uyanışından bahsedilmektedir. Bu hareketin yakın geçmiş kadar uzak geçmişe de uzanan tarihsel bir süreci vardır. Alevî hareketinin oluşumu geçmişten bugüne iktidar ve muhalefet odaklı bir yapıyla ortaya çıkmıştır. Dikkat çeken husus bu süreçte tanımların iktidar merkezli yapılması ve Aleviliğin buna karşı mevzilenmek konumunda kalmasıdır. Kızılbaş adının terkedilmesi ve Alevi adının benimsenmesi bunun bir göstergesidir. Bu makale 5 bölümden oluşmakta ve ilk bölümde Alevi hareketinin ortaya çıkışından Millî Mücadele’ye olan tarihsel süreç anlatılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞTAN, Y. K. (2012). The Politicization of Alevism and Alevi Opening I: Historical Roots. Karadeniz Araştırmaları, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 35, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/208823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ALLOUCHE Adel (1983), The Origins and Development of the Ottoman-Safavid Conflict (1500-1555), Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag. BARKAN Ömer L. (1942), “İstilâ Devirlerinin Kolonizatör Türk Dervişleri ve Zaviyeler”, Vakıflar Dergisi, s. II, s. 279-386.
  2. BENDIX Regina (1997), In Search of Authenticity: The Formation of Folklore Studies, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
  3. BOZARSLAN Hamit (2003), “Alevism and the Myths of Research: The Need for a New Research Agenda”, Turkey’s Alevi Enigma: A Comprehensive Overview (ed. Paul J. White, Joost Jongerden), Leiden: Brill, pp. 3-16.
  4. ÇAMUROĞLU Reha (2008), Değişen Koşullarda Alevîlik, İstanbul: Kapı Yayınları. DAVEY Richard (1897), The Sultan and His Subjects, vol. 1, London: Chapmanand Hall. DE CARO Francis A. (1976), “Concepts of the Past in Folkloristics”, Western Folklore, XXXV(1), pp. 16-17.
  5. DÜNDAR Fuat (2008), Modern Türkiye’nin Şifresi: İttihat ve Terakki’nin EtnisiteMühendisliği: 1913-1918, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. EBUZZİYA TEVFİK (1329), “Farmasonluk”, Mecmua-ı Ebuzziya, 100. cüz, s.673-682.
  6. GÖNER Özlem (2005), “The Transformation of the Alevi Collective Identity”, Cultural Dynamics, XVII/2 (2005), pp.107-134.
  7. HASLUCK F. W. (1929), Christianity and Islam under the Sultans (ed. Margaret Hasluck), vol. 1, Oxford: at the Clarendon Press.
  8. HASLUCK F. W. (2000), Bektaşilik Tetkikleri (çev. Râgıp Hulusi), Ankara:
  9. MEB Yay. HODGSON Marshall G. S. (1955), The Order of Assassins: The Struggle of the Early Nizari Ismailis against the Islamic World, 's-Gravenhage: Mouton. İNALCIK Halil (1970), “The Rise of the Ottoman Empire”, The Cambridge History of Islam, Vol. I-A (ed. P. M. Holt vd.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 299. İRAT Ali Murat (2006), The Alevi Community in Tyrkey after 1980: An Evaluation of Political Group Boundaries in the Context of Ethnicity Theories, Ankara: Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. KÜÇÜK Hülya (2002), The Role of the Bektāshīs in Turkey’s National Struggle, Leiden 2002. MASSICARD Élise (2007), Türkiye’den Avrupa’ya Alevi Hareketinin Siyasallaşması (çev. Ali Berktay), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. MEHMED ES‘AD (1241), Üss-i Zafer, İstanbul. MÉLIKOFF Irène (1994), Uyur İdik Uyardılar: Alevîlik-Beştaşîlik Araştırmaları (çev. Turan Alptekin), İstanbul:
  10. Cem Yayınevi.
  11. MOOSA Matti (1987), Extremist Shiites: The Ghulat Sects, Syracuse N.Y: Syracuse University Press.
  12. NEWMAN Andrew J. (2006), Safavid Iran: Rebirth of a Persian Empire, London & New York: I. B. Tau