Journals / Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Conners-Wells' Adolescent Self-Report Scale-Long Form: Evaluation Psychometric Properties for Turkish Adolescents

Conners-Wells ergen öz-bildirim ölçeği uzun formu: Türk ergenlerde psikometrik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi

Pages
71–84
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: It was concluded that besides the other information sources, the Turkish form of CASS-L is a valid and reliable instrument based on adolescents' reports and can be use to determining the effects of treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose of this study was to provide Turkish version and investigate psychometric properties of the Conners-Wells' Adolescent Self-Report Scale-Long Form- CASS-L.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: By the means of multistage sampling 1898 children and adolescents aged 12-17 years old were enrolled in this study and confirmatory factor analysis was performed for their responses to CASS-L form.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: It was concluded that besides the other information sources, the Turkish form of CASS-L is a valid and reliable instrument based on adolescents' reports and can be use to determining the effects of treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose of this study was to provide Turkish version and investigate psychometric properties of the Conners-Wells' Adolescent Self-Report Scale-Long Form- CASS-L. Method: By the means of multistage sampling 1898 children and adolescents aged 12-17 years old were enrolled in this study and confirmatory factor analysis was performed for their responses to CASS-L form. The structure validity of the scale was also investigated by the correlations between subscales, item analysis, and the comparison of known groups. To evaluate criterion validity the correlation with Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised/Long-CTRS-R/L, Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised/Long. CPRS-R/L, Beck Depression Scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were conducted. Internal reliability of CASS-L was measured with Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Spearman-Brown split half coefficient, and test-retest reliability was also investigated. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that CASS-L CPRS-R/L form's structure derived from Turkish children were fit to the original structure of the scale except one item. Conclusion: It was concluded that besides the other information sources, the Turkish form of CASS-L is a valid and reliable instrument based on adolescents' reports and can be use to determining the effects of treatment. However, CASS-L' structure validity must be investigated on the adolescents with different types of ADHD and different psychiatric diagnosis.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Conners-Wells Ergen Özbildirim Ölçeği-Uzun (CWEÖÖ-U) formunun Türkçe'ye uyarlan- ması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlan mıştır . Yöntem: Aşamalı örnekleme yoluyla 12-17 yaşın daki 1898 ergenin CWEÖÖ-U'a verdikleri yanıtlardan elde edilen verilere doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmıştır . Ölçeğin yapı geçerliği ayrıca alt ölçekler arası korelasyon lar , bilinen grupların kıyaslaması yöntemi ve madde ana lizi yoluyla da incelenmiştir . Ölçüt geçerliği için CWEÖÖ U'un Conners Anababa Dereceleme Ölçeği-Yenilen miş/Uzun, Conners Öğretmen Dereceleme Ölçeği Yenilenmiş/Uzun, Beck Depresyon Envanteri ve Çocuklar için Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri ile ilişkileri incelenmiştir . CWEÖÖ-U'un iç tutarlılığı Cronbach alfa ve Spearman Brown iki yarı güvenirliği teknikleriyle incelenmiştir. Ölçeğin zaman içindeki tutarlığı ise test-yeniden test yön temiyle test edilmiştir . Bulgular: Doğrulayıcı faktör ana lizi, bir maddenin farklı bir alt ölçeğe yerleşmesinin dışın da CWEÖÖ-U'nun Türk ergenlerinden elde edilen yapısı nın özgün ölçek ile özdeş olduğunu, güvenirlik analizleri de ölçeğin güvenirlik katsayılarının doyurucu düzeyde olduğunu ortaya koymuştur . Sonuç: CWEÖÖ-U'nun Türk çe formunun, diğer bilgi kaynaklarının yanı sıra DEHB'nin uygulanan tedavinin etkisini belirlemede, ergenlerin görüşlerine dayalı olarak kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güve nilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu söylenebilir . Ancak, farklı DEHB tiplerinde ve farklı psikiyatrik tanı gruplarında ölçeğin yapı geçerliğinin incelenmesinde yarar vardır .

🔖

Cite This Article

KANER, S., İŞERİ, E., ÖZAYDIN, L., AK, A., BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş. (2011). Conners-Wells' Adolescent Self-Report Scale-Long Form: Evaluation Psychometric Properties for Turkish Adolescents. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 71–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/208040

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Achenbach TM, Dümenci L, Rescoria LA (2002) Ten-year com parisons of problems and competencies fon national samples of youth: Self, parent and teacher reports. J Emot Behav Disord, 10:194-203.
  2. Aiken LR (2000) Psychological Testing and Assessment. Needham Heights: A Pearson Education Company. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1984) The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49:155-173.
  3. Aysev A (1996) Dikkat eksikliği hiperaktivite bozukluğu. Ruh sağlığı ve hastalıkları. I Sayıl (Ed), Ankara: Antıp Yayınları, s.601-609.
  4. Bahn GH, Shin MS, Cho SC ve ark. (2001) A preliminary study for the development of the assessment scale for ADHD in ado lescents: Reliability and validiy for CASS (S). Korean Journal of Child Psychiatry, 12, 218-224.
  5. Becker A, Hagenberg N, Roesner V ve ark. (2004) Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: Do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adulth informants. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 13(Suppl 2):17-24. Benediktsdòtir SD, Davidsdòttir SD (2003) Sjalfsmatskvaròi Conners-Wells fyrir unglinga: Stöòlun og athugun a proffræòi legum eiginleikum. Salfræòiritiò, 8:83-92.
  6. Blinder JB, Cumella EJ, Sanathara VA (2006) Psychiatric comorbidity of female inpatients with eating disorders. Psychosom Med, 68:454-462.
  7. Carlston D, Ogles B (2006) The impact of items and anchors on parent-child reports of problem behavior. Child Adolesc Social Work J, 23:24-37.
  8. Carlston D, Ogles B (2009) Age, gender, and etnicty effects on parents-child discrepancy using identical items measures. J Child Fam Stud, 18:125-135.
  9. Cole DA (1987) Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. J Consult Clin Psychol, 55:1019-1031.
  10. Conners CK (1997) Conners' Rating Scales-Revised. Instruments for use with children and adolescents. Toronto: MHS. Conners CK, Wells KC, Parker JD ve ark. (1997) A new self- report scale for assessment of adolescent psychopathology: Factor structure, reliability, validity and diagnostic sensitivity. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 25:487-497.
  11. Conners CK, Sitarenios G, Parker JD ve ark. (1998a) Revision and restandardization of the Conners teacher rating scale (CTRS-R): Factor structure, reliability and criterion validity. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 26:279-291.
  12. Conners CK, Sitarenios G, Parker JD ve ark. (1998b) The revised Conners' Parent rating scale (CPRS-R): Factor struc ture, reliability, and criterion validit