Journals / KBB-Forum / 2006 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

İnterorbital aralık ölçümü: Sinonazal patolojilerde değişir mi?

Grading for interorbital distance: Does it variate in sinonasal pathologies?

Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
69–72
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This parameter has not been influenced from sinonasal pathologies such as nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Anatomic variations and configurations of ethmoid sinuses (along with dimensions) are very important for endoscopic sinus surgeon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Five hundred fifty-four adult patients (321 Male, 233 female) underwent paranasal sinus computed tomography imaging for evaluation of either rhinological or orbital complaints were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This parameter has not been influenced from sinonasal pathologies such as nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Paranazal sinüs hastalıkları · Endoskopi · Geriyedönük çalışma

Abstract

Objective: Anatomic variations and configurations of ethmoid sinuses (along with dimensions) are very important for endoscopic sinus surgeon. The most dangerous complications of endoscopic sinus surgery are orbital and intracranial ones. The purpose of this study was to make a classification of interorbital distance and to determine whether it was altered by some sinonasal pathology. Materials and Methods: Five hundred fifty-four adult patients (321 Male, 233 female) underwent paranasal sinus computed tomography imaging for evaluation of either rhinological or orbital complaints were included in this study. The patients were classified as follows: patients with nasal polyposis (n= 75), patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (n= 192), patients without sinonasal disease (n= 287). Interorbital distance and Keros typing of all patients were measured from the same standard location of coronal computed tomography of paranasal sinuses. Results: There was no statistically significant difference among three groups regarding to two types of classifications. Conclusions: Computed tomography of paranasal sinus before endoscopic sinus surgery may give some clue about surgical difficulties in the region of the narrowest part of ethmoids (interorbital distance). This parameter has not been influenced from sinonasal pathologies such as nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis.

Özet

Amaç: Etmoid sinüslerin anatomik varyasyonları ve yapıları (boyutları vs.) endoskopik sinüs cerrahları için çok önemlidir. Endoskopik sinüs cerrahisinin en tehlikeli komplikasyonları orbital ve intrakraniyal olanlardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı interorbital aralığa bir sınıflama oluşturmak ve var ise sinonazal patolojilere bağlı değişimlerini belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya orbital ve rinolojik değerlendirme için paranazal sinüs tomografisi çekilen 554 hasta (321 erkek, 233 kadın) dahil edildi. Hastalar şu şekilde sınıflandırıldı: nazal polip (n= 75), kronik rinosinüzit (n= 192), sinonazal patolojisi olmayanlar (n= 287). Bütün hastaların Keros tipleri ve interorbital aralıkları, paranazal sinüslerinin koronal plandaki bilgisayarlı tomografilerinin aynı standart kesitinde ölçüldü. Bulgular: Gruplar arasında bu iki tip sınıflandırmaya göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı. Sonuçlar: Endoskopik sinüs cerrahisi öncesinde paranazal sinüslerin tomografileri, etmoidler arasındaki en dar bölgede (interorbital aralık) olabilecek cerrahi zorluklar hakkında aydınlatıcı bilgi verebilir. Bu parametre, nazal polip ve kronik sinüzit gibi nazal patolojilerden etkilenmez.

🔖

Cite This Article

YASAN, H., AYNALI, G., DOĞRU, H., BAYKAL, B., YARIKTAŞ, M. (2006). İnterorbital aralık ölçümü: Sinonazal patolojilerde değişir mi?. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 69–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/208018

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ferrie JC, Azais O, Vandermareq P, Klossek JM, Drouineau J, Gasquet C. X-Ray computed tomographic study of the ethmoid and middle meatus. II. Radioanatomy (axial incidence) and morphological variations. J Radiol 1991;72:477-87. (PMID: 1602445
  2. Kenny TJ, Duncavage J, Bracikowski J, Yildirim A, Murray JJ, Tanner SB. Prospective analysis of sinus symptoms and correlation with paranasal computed tomography scan. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;125:40-4. (PMID: 11458212
  3. Mafee MF, Carter BL. Nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. In: Valvassori GE, Mafee MF, Carter BL. Imaging of the Head and Neck. New York, Thieme Medical Publishers Inc; 1995:289
  4. Sanchez Fernandez JM, Anta Escuredo JA, Sanchez Del Rey A, Santaolalla Montoya F. Morphometric study of the paranasal sinuses in normal and pathological conditions. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120(2):273-8. (PMID: 11603789)
  5. Streitmann M.J, Otto R.A, Sakai C.S. Anatomic considerations in complications of endoscopic and intranasal sinus surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;103:105-9. (PMID: 8311385
  6. Bingham B, Wang RG, Hawke M, Kwok P. The embryonic development of the lateral nasal wall from 8 to 24 weeks. Laryngoscope 1991;101:992-7. (PMID: 1886449
  7. Arslan H, Aydinlioglu A, Bozkurt M, Egeli E. Anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses: CT examinations for endoscopic sinus surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1999;26:39- 48. (PMID: 10077255
  8. Meloni F, Mini R, Rovasio S, Stomeo F, Teatini GP. Anatomic variations of surgical importance in ethmoid labyrinth and sphenoid sinus. A study of radiological anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat 1992;14:65-70. (PMID: 1589850
  9. Anderhuber W, Walch C, Fock C. Configuration of ethmoid roof in children 0-14 years of age. Laryngorhinootologie. 2001;80(9):509-11. (PMID: 11555781).