Journals / OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 38

Analysis of the Relationship Between the Destructive Leadership and the Perceived Organizational Obstacles

Yıkıcı Liderlik ile Algılanan Örgütsel Engel Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Pages
5006–5041
Publication Date
2021-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was determined that the dimensions of “inadequate leadership skills” and “nepotism (favoritism)” which are destructive leadership sub-dimensions, significantly predict the perceived organizational obstacles, and a high level of positive relationship was found between destructive leadership and perceived organizational obstacle.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between destructive leadership behaviors of school administrators and organizational obstacle according to teachers' perceptions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the correlational method, this research was conduct-ed with 325 teachers working in pre-school, primary, secondary and high schools in Sakarya. "Destructive Leadership Scale" and "Perceived Organizational Obstruction Scale" were used to collect data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was determined that the dimensions of “inadequate leadership skills” and “nepotism (favoritism)” which are destructive leadership sub-dimensions, significantly predict the perceived organizational obstacles, and a high level of positive relationship was found between destructive leadership and perceived organizational obstacle.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Leadership · Disruptive leadership · Organizational obstruction

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between destructive leadership behaviors of school administrators and organizational obstacle according to teachers' perceptions. For this purpose, in this study, it has been examined that how often school administrators perform destructive leadership behaviors, the relationship between both destructive leadership and perceived organizational obstacle, and gender of school administrators, type of school, number of staff at school, tenure of teachers, in addition, the extent to which destructive leadership sub-dimensions predict perceived organizational obstacle and the relationship between these two concepts. With the correlational method, this research was conduct-ed with 325 teachers working in pre-school, primary, secondary and high schools in Sakarya. "Destructive Leadership Scale" and "Perceived Organizational Obstruction Scale" were used to collect data. In the research findings, it was determined that the level of performing destructive leadership of school administrators was low and significant difference was found between the destructive leadership and the number of school staff and tenure of teachers. According to the teachers’ perceptions, the level of perceived organizational obstacle was determined to be low, and there was a significant difference between the perceived organizational obstacle and the type of school and the number of staff at school. It was determined that the dimensions of “inadequate leadership skills” and “nepotism (favoritism)” which are destructive leadership sub-dimensions, significantly predict the perceived organizational obstacles, and a high level of positive relationship was found between destructive leadership and perceived organizational obstacle.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı okul yöneticilerinin yıkıcı liderlik davranışları ile öğretmenlerin algılarına göre örgütsel engel arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir. Bu amaçla çalışmada okul yöneticilerinin yıkıcı liderlik davranışlarını ne sıklıkla sergiledikleri, yıkıcı liderlik ve algılanan örgütsel engel değişkenleri ile okul yöneticilerinin cinsiyeti, okul türü, okuldaki personel sayısı, öğretmenlerin hizmet yılı değişkenleri arasındaki ilişki ve bunların yanında yıkıcı liderlik alt boyutlarının algılanan örgütsel engelleri ne derece yordadığı ve yıkıcı liderlik ile algılanan örgütsel engel arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. İlişkisel modelde olan bu araştırma Sakarya ilindeki okul öncesi, ilkokul, ortaokul ve liselerde görev yapan toplam 325 öğretmen ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Verilerin toplanmasında “Yıkıcı Liderlik Ölçeği” ile “Algılanan Örgütsel Engel Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularında okul yöneticilerinin yıkıcı liderlik davranışlarını sergileme düzeyinin düşük olduğu belirlenmiş ve yıkıcı liderlik ile okuldaki personel sayısı ve öğretmenlerin hizmet yılı arasında anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmiştir. Öğretmenlerin algılarına göre algılanan örgütsel engel düzeyinin düşük olduğu belirlenmiş, algılanan örgütsel engel ile okul türü ve okuldaki personel sayısı değişkenleri arasında anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmiştir. Yıkıcı liderlik alt boyutlarından olan “liderlik için yetkin olmamak” ve “adam kayırma” boyutlarının algılanan örgütsel engelleri anlamlı olarak yordadığı ve yıkıcı liderlik ile algılanan örgütsel engel arasında pozitif yüksek düzeyde ilişki tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİN, M., MARAL, M. (2021). Analysis of the Relationship Between the Destructive Leadership and the Perceived Organizational Obstacles. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 38, 5006–5041. https://ajindex.com/articles/206651

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14 (2), 126-140.
  2. Bardes, M. ve Piccolo, R. F. (2010). Goal setting as an antecedent of destructive leader behaviors: When leadership goes wrong: destructive leadership, mistakes, and ethical failures. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing. Barutçugil, İ. (2014). Liderlik. İstanbul:
  3. KariyerYayınları.
  4. Bateman, T. S. ve Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26 (4), 587-595.
  5. Brandes, P., Dharwadkar, R., and Dean, J. W. (1999, Mayıs). Does organizational cynicism matter? Employee and supervisor perspectives on work outcomes. Eastern Academy of Management Proceedings, 2, 150-153.
  6. Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2013). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Ankara:
  7. Pegem Akademi. Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel very analizi. Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Celep, C. (2014). Eğitim yöneticisinin liderlik davranışı. Ankara:
  9. Nobel AkademikYayıncılık. Chan, D. K., Chow, S. Y., Lam, C. B. ve Cheung, S. F. (2008). Examining the job-related, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32 (4), 362-376.
  10. Chandler, D. J. ve Fields, D. (2010). Ignoring the signposts: A process perspective of unethical and destructive leadership. B. Schyns and T. Hansbrough (Der.), When leadership goes wrong: Destructive leadership, mistakes, and ethical failures (s.99–143). USA: IAP Information Age Publishing. Christie, R. ve Geiss, F. L. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press. 14 Kasım 2019 tarihinde, https://www.amazon. com/Studies-Machiavellianism-Social-Psychology-Monographsebook/ dp/B01M1BFIW2 adresindenerişildi. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Boston: Pearson. Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A., and Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional. Group and Organization- Management, 27, 324–351.
  11. Çelik, V. (2015). Eğitimselliderlik. Ankara:
  12. PegemAkademi. Çetin, I. (2019). Yıkıcı liderlerde etik dışı davranışlar. Balkan ve Yakın Doğu BilimlerDergisi, 5 (2), 108-119.
  13. DuBrin, A. J. (1995). Leadership research findings, practice, and skills. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C. vePagon, M. (2002).