SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions

Enes ISIKGOZ
Melike ESENTAS
Nevzat DINCER
Pages
296–306
Publication Date
2017-08-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the relevant findings, the physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions were positive in the sub-dimensions of participation-criticism, transparency, justice, equality and accountability but not high, the teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions did not significantly vary in gender, assigned school type, marital status and education background variables, in some sub-dimensions they significantly differed in assigned geographical region and seniority variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research was to analyze the physical education and sport teachers’ perceptions about organizational democracy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research group consisted of 191 physical education and sport teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the relevant findings, the physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions were positive in the sub-dimensions of participation-criticism, transparency, justice, equality and accountability but not high, the teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions did not significantly vary in gender, assigned school type, marital status and education background variables, in some sub-dimensions they significantly differed in assigned geographical region and seniority variables.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:high school · organizational democracy · physical education and sport

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to analyze the physical education and sport teachers’ perceptions about organizational democracy. The research group consisted of 191 physical education and sport teachers. The research data were collected by “The Organizational Democracy Scale”. In the analysis of data, descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney-U and Kruskall Wallis-H tests were used. According to the relevant findings, the physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions were positive in the sub-dimensions of participation-criticism, transparency, justice, equality and accountability but not high, the teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions did not significantly vary in gender, assigned school type, marital status and education background variables, in some sub-dimensions they significantly differed in assigned geographical region and seniority variables.

🔖

Cite This Article

ISIKGOZ, E., ESENTAS, M., DINCER, N. (2017). Physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 296–306. https://ajindex.com/articles/206125

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Acar, G., Kaya, M. ve Şahin, M.Y. (2012). School administrators ethical leadership behavior effects on physical education teachers organizational justice level, Turkish Journal of Sport And Exercise, 14(3), 51- 58. Akman, N. (2015). Kamu yönetiminde hesap verebilirlik, necmiakman.blogspot.com.tr/2015/01/necmi-akman-giris-20.html, Erişim Tarihi:14.07.2017
  2. Argon, T., Uylas, S.D. ve Yerlikaya, S. (2015). Perceptions of teachers related accountability practices ın Turkish national education sistem and organizational cynicism, International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 204-219.
  3. Ataç, L.O. ve Köse, S. (2017). Örgütsel demokrasi ve örgütsel muhalefet ilişkisi: Beyaz yakalılar üzerine bir araştırma, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(1), 117-132.
  4. Avcı, N. (2015). Eğitim yönetiminde hesap verilebilirlik, gencburokrat.com/kose-yazisi/40/egitim-yonetiminde-hesap-verilebilirlik.html, Erişim Tarihi:25.06.2017
  5. Bahadır, Z. ve Certel, Z. (2016). Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin örgütsel sessizlikleri ile örgütsel adanmışlıklarının incelenmesi, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 7(1), 135-146.
  6. Bakan, İ., Kara, E. ve Güler, B. (2017). Örgütsel demokrasi algısının çalışanların iç girişimcilik performansına etkileri: Marmaris’teki otel işletmelerinde bir alan araştırması, HAK-İŞ Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 6(14), 115-138.
  7. Başaran, İ.E. (1982).
  8. Örgütsel davranış, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları,
  9. Ankara.
  10. Benligiray, S. (2004).
  11. İnsan kaynakları yönetimi, Anadolu Üniversitesi,
  12. Eskişehir. Bozkurt, T. (2011).
  13. Çalışma ilişkilerinin evrimi, Beta Yayınları,
  14. İstanbul.
  15. Coşan, P.E. ve Gülova, A.A. (2014).
  16. Örgütsel demokrasi, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 21(2), 231-248.
  17. Crane, A. ve Matten, D. (2005). What is stakeholder democracy? Perspectives and issues, business ethics, A Europan Review, 14(1), 6-13.
  18. Çelik, O. T. (2011). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin ve öğretmenlerinin örgütsel adalet algıları ile iş doyumları arasındaki ilişki, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya. Demirtaş, Z. ve Alanoğlu, M. (2015). Öğretmenlerin karara katılımı ve iş doyumu arasındaki ilişki, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD),16(2), 83-100.
  19. DiPaola, M.F., Tarter, C.J. ve Hoy, W.K. (2005). Measuring organizational citizenship of schools: The OCB Scale, (Eds.: Hoy, W. and Miskel, C.), Educational Leadership and Reform. Greenwich, CN: Information Age Publishing, 31