SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions

Melike ESENTAS
Enes ISIKGOZ
Nevzat DINCER
Pages
296–306
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the relevant findings, the physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions were positive in the sub-dimensions of participation-criticism, transparency, justice, equality and accountability but not high, the teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions did not significantly vary in gender, assigned school type, marital status and education background variables, in some sub-dimensions they significantly differed in assigned geographical region and seniority variables

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research was to analyze the physical education and sport teachers’ perceptions about organizational democracy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research group consisted of 191 physical education and sport teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the relevant findings, the physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions were positive in the sub-dimensions of participation-criticism, transparency, justice, equality and accountability but not high, the teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions did not significantly vary in gender, assigned school type, marital status and education background variables, in some sub-dimensions they significantly differed in assigned geographical region and seniority variables
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to analyze the physical education and sport teachers’ perceptions about organizational democracy. The research group consisted of 191 physical education and sport teachers. The research data were collected by “The Organizational Democracy Scale”. In the analysis of data, descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney-U and Kruskall Wallis-H tests were used. According to the relevant findings, the physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions were positive in the sub-dimensions of participation-criticism, transparency, justice, equality and accountability but not high, the teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions did not significantly vary in gender, assigned school type, marital status and education background variables, in some sub-dimensions they significantly differed in assigned geographical region and seniority variables

🔖

Cite This Article

ESENTAS, M., ISIKGOZ, E., DINCER, N. (2022). Physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 296–306. https://ajindex.com/articles/642360

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acar G. Kaya M. Şahin. MY. School administrator’s ethical leadership behavior effects on physical education teachers organizational justice level. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 2012; 14(3): 51- 58
  2. Akman N. Kamu yönetiminde hesap verebilirlik. necmiakman.blogspot.com.tr/2015/01/necmi-akman-giris20.html. 2015. Erişim Tarihi: 14.07.2017 3. Argon T. Uylas SD. Yerlikaya S. Perceptions of teachers related accountability practices ın Turkish national education sistem and organizational cynicism. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2015; 7(2): 204-219
  3. Ataç LO. Köse S. The relationship between organizational democracy and organizational dissent: A Research on white collar workers. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 2017; 46(1): 117-132
  4. Avcı N. Eğitim yönetiminde hesap verilebilirlik. gencburokrat.com/kose-yazisi/40/egitim-yonetiminde-hesapverilebilirlik.html. 2015. Erişim Tarihi: 25.06.2017 6. Bahadır Z. Certel Z. Investigation of organizational silence and organizational commitment of physical education teachers. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 2017; 7(1): 135-146
  5. Bakan İ. Kara E. Güler B. The effects of organizational democracy perception on employees’ intrapreneurshıp performance: An empirical in hotel firms in Marmaris. HAK-İŞ Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 2017; 6(14): 115-138
  6. Başaran İE. Örgütsel davranış. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara, 1982
  7. Benligiray S. İnsan kaynakları yönetimi. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir, 2004
  8. Bozkurt T. Çalışma ilişkilerinin evrimi. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul, 2011
  9. Coşan PE. Gülova AA. Organizational democracy. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 2014; 21(2): 231-248
  10. Crane A. Matten D. What is stakeholder democracy? Perspectives and issues, business ethics. A Europan Review, 2005; 14(1): 6-13
  11. Çelik OT. The relationship between school managers’ and tteachers’ perception of organizational justice and job satisfaction. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Selçuk University Institute of Educational Sciences, Konya, 2012
  12. Demirtaş Z. Alanoğlu M. The relationship between participation in decisionmaking of teachers and job satisfaction. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 2015; 16(2): 83-100
  13. DiPaola MF. Tarter CJ. Hoy WK. Measuring organizational citizenship of schools: The OCB Scale. (Eds.: Hoy. W. and Miskel. C.). Educational Leadership and Reform, Greenwich, CN: Infor