SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler / 2017 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Ottoman Urban Historiography Before and After Globalization

Küreselleşme Öncesi ve Sonrası Osmanlı Kent Tarihçiliği

GÜLAY YILMAZ DİKO
Pages
105–131
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article presents the basic questions and themes of Ottoman urban history during the modern era and tries to depict through samples how globalization and the new perceptions of ‘space’ changed the identity and interests of historians.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The historiographical changes of Ottoman urban historigrahpy are not only fed by the debates of the history as a discipline but also resulted due to globalization and the transformation of the urban space with neoliberal policies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The historiographical changes of Ottoman urban historigrahpy are not only fed by the debates of the history as a discipline but also resulted due to globalization and the transformation of the urban space with neoliberal policies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article presents the basic questions and themes of Ottoman urban history during the modern era and tries to depict through samples how globalization and the new perceptions of ‘space’ changed the identity and interests of historians.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The historiographical changes of Ottoman urban historigrahpy are not only fed by the debates of the history as a discipline but also resulted due to globalization and the transformation of the urban space with neoliberal policies. This article presents the basic questions and themes of Ottoman urban history during the modern era and tries to depict through samples how globalization and the new perceptions of ‘space’ changed the identity and interests of historians.

Özet

Osmanlı kent tarihçiliği alanındaki historiografik değişimler sırf tarih disiplinin iç tartışmalarından beslenen bir süreç değil aynı zamanda neoliberal politikaların kent mekanında yarattığı değişim ve küreselleşme kaynaklıdır. Bu makale Osmanlı kent tarihçiliğinin modern dönemi ve temel sorunsallarını ortaya koyuyor ve 1970'lerden bugüne gelişmekte olan küreselleşme ve 'mekanın' yeni algısının tarihçinin kimliğini ve ilgi alanlarını ne yönde değiştirdiğini örneklerle göstermeye çalışıyor.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİKO, G. Y. (2017). Ottoman Urban Historiography Before and After Globalization. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 105–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/204816

References (15)

  1. Abu-Lughod, J. (1994), “The Islamic City- Historic Myth, Islamic Essence, and Contemporary Relevance”, International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies Cilt 19, Sayı 2, s. 155-176.
  2. Acun, F. (2002), “A Portrait of the Ottoman Cities”, The Muslim World, sayı 92, s. 255- 285. Ayalon, Y. (2014), Natural Disasters in the Ottoman Empire: Plague, Famine, and Other Misfortunes, Cambridge University Press,
  3. Cambridge. Baer, G. (1970), “The administrative, economic and social functions of the Turkish guilds”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, Sayı 1, s. 28-50.
  4. Baer, M. D. (2004), “The Great Fire of 1660 and the Islamization of Christian and Jewish Space in Istanbul”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, Cilt 36, Sayı 2, s. 163-164.
  5. Balsoy, G. (2013), The Politics of Reproduction in Ottoman Society, 1838-1900, Pickering&Chattoo Publishers,
  6. Londra. Barbir, K. (1980), Ottoman Rule in Damascus 1708-1758,
  7. Princeton University Press,
  8. Princeton. Barkey, K. ve Gavrilis, G. (2016) “The Ottoman Millet System: Non-Territorial Autonomy and its Contemporary Legacy”, Ethnopolitics: Formerly Global Review of Ethnopolitics, Cilt 15, Sayı 1, s. 24-42.
  9. Başaran, B. (2014), Selim III. Social Control and Policing in Istanbul at the End of the Eighteenth Century: Between Crisis and Order, Brill Publications, Leiden, Boston. Başaran, B. ve Kırlı, C. “Some Observation on Istanbul’s Artisans During the Reign of Selim III (1789-1808)”, Faroqhi, S. (Ed.) Bread From the Lion’s Mouth: Artisans Struggling for a Livelihood in Ottoman Cities, Berghahn Books, New York, s. 259- 278. Bierman, I. A., Abou-El-Haj, R. A. ve Prezios, D. (Ed.), (1991),
  10. The Ottoman City and Its Parts, Aristide D. Caratzas Publisher,New York. Bilgin, A. (2010), “Osmanlı Dönemi İstanbul Bostanları (bir giriş denemesi)”, Yemek ve Kültür, Sayı 20, s. 86-97.
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1980),
  12. Le Sens pratique, Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris. (1979), La Distinction. Critique sociale du jugement, Les Éditions de Minuit,Paris Boykov, G. (2010), “Balkan City or Ottoman City?: A Study on the Models of Urban Development in Ottoman Upper Thrace, From the Fifteenth to the Seventeenth Century ”, Proceedings of the Third International Congress on the Islamic Civilization in the Balkans 1-5 Novemter 2006,
  13. Bucharest, Romania, IRCICA, Istanbul, s. 69-85.
  14. Brummett, P. (2015), Mapping the Ottomans: Sovereignty, Territory, and Identity in the Early Modern Mediterranean, Cambridge University Press,
  15. Cambridge. Burbank J. ve Cooper F. (2011)