Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

SPİNAL TRAVMALARDA SINIFLAMA VE TEDAVİ PRENSİPLERİ: 234 OLGULU BİR RETROSPEKTİF ÇALIŞMA

SPINAL TRAUMA CLASSIFICATION AND PRINCIPLES OF TREATMENT: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 234 CASES

Pages
27–36
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A classification for each patient has been made separately according to the results of X-ray, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of patients, performed just after the patients consulted to the hospital.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine the age, gender, reason of injury, neurological status, level of fracture, type of fracture of the cases that are hospitalized in our clinic due to spinal trauma and that are practiced medical or surgical treatment in a retrospective way and to compare the results with the literature and to discuss them.Material and Method: This research has been conducted in between January 2004 - December 2011 by evaluating 234 patients who were exposed to spinal trauma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A classification for each patient has been made separately according to the results of X-ray, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of patients, performed just after the patients consulted to the hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Using a general classification system has turned to be compulsory in determining the treatment that is to be applied to the patient
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To determine the age, gender, reason of injury, neurological status, level of fracture, type of fracture of the cases that are hospitalized in our clinic due to spinal trauma and that are practiced medical or surgical treatment in a retrospective way and to compare the results with the literature and to discuss them.Material and Method: This research has been conducted in between January 2004 - December 2011 by evaluating 234 patients who were exposed to spinal trauma. They were exposed to cervical, thoracic and lumbar area. Trauma has been included to this research. A classification for each patient has been made separately according to the results of X-ray, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of patients, performed just after the patients consulted to the hospital. The patients have been classified in 5 groups according to upper cervical, lower cervical, thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbar area traumas and each group has been evaluated in itself.Conclusion: In our research, the most frequent reason of spinal traumas has been determined to be motor vehicle accidents and the most affected area has been determined to be thoracolumbar area (T11-L1). Using a general classification system has turned to be compulsory in determining the treatment that is to be applied to the patient

Özet

Amaç: tedavi uygulanan olguların retrospektif olarak yaş, cinsiyet, yaralanma nedeni, nörolojik durumu, kırık seviyesi, kırık tipi belirlemek, sonuçlarımızı literatürle karşılaştırmak ve tartışmaktır.Materyal Metod: Bu çalışma Ocak 2004-Aralık 2011 tarihleri arasında Spinal travmaya maruz kalan 234 hasta değerlendirilerek yapılmıştır. Servikal, Torakal ve Lomber bölge travmasına maruz kalan 234 hastanın hastaneye başvurduklarında çekilen Direkt Grafi, Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (BT) ve Magnetik Rezonans Görüntüleme (MRG) sonucunda her bir hastaya ayrı ayrı sınıflandırma yapılmıştır. Hastalar Üst Servikal, Alt Servikal, Torakal, Torakolomber ve Lomber bölge travmalarına göre 5 ayrı gruba ayrılmış, her bir grup kendi içinde değerlendirilmiştir.Sonuçlar: Çalışmamızda spinal travmaların en sık nedeni olarak motorlu taşıt kazaları ve en sık etkilenen bölgede torakolomber bölge ( T11-L1) bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Hastalara uygulanacak tedavinin belirlenmesinde genel bir sınıflama sisteminin kullanılması artık zorunlu hale gelmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZHAN, S., BOYACI, M. G., KARAVELİOĞLU, E., ASLAN, A., KARABEKİR, H. S., ESER, O. (2015). SPİNAL TRAVMALARDA SINIFLAMA VE TEDAVİ PRENSİPLERİ: 234 OLGULU BİR RETROSPEKTİF ÇALIŞMA. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 27–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/204488

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. American Spinal Injuries Association. "ASIA clas-sification." Standards for neurological and functional clas-sification of spinal cord injury. Chicago, Illinois, 1992.2- Anderson LD, D'Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg 1974; 56-A(8):1663-1674.3- Argenson C, De Peretti F, Ghabris A, Eude P, Lovet J, Hovorka I. A scheme for the classification of lower cervical spine injuries.Maitrise Orthopedique 2005.4- Arnold PM, Haynes NG, Kelley BC. Evaluation and treatment of odontoid and Hangman's Fractures. In: Winn HR (Ed.). Youman's Neurological Surgery, 6th Ed., Saunders, Philadelphia, Vol.3, 2011; pp: 3192-3200.5- Ayral F, Seyhan F. The surgical treatment of the fractures of the odontoid process. Acta Orthop Traumatol Tu r c 2004; 10(3): 153-163.6- Berkman M. Omurga Travmalarında Beyin Cer-rahisi Yaklaşımı. Türkiye Klinikleri 2008; 1(1): 120-126.7- Blauth M, Kathrein A, Mair G, Schmid R, Rein-hold M, Rieger M. Classification of injuries of the sub-axial cervical spine. In: Aebi M, Arlet V, Webb JK (Eds.), AO Spine Manuel Clinical Applications. Vol
  2. AO Pub-lishing, Davos, 2007; pp: 9-21.8- Bohlman HH, Ducker TB. Spine and spinal cord injury. In: Rothman RH, Simeone FA (Eds.), The Spine, Third Edition. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1992; pp: 973-1104.9- Cripps RA, Lee BB, Wing P, Weerts E, Mackay J, Brown D. A global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository for injury prevention. Spinal Cord 2010; 49(4): 493-501.10- Çiftdemir M. Servikal omurga yaralanmaları. J Turk Spinal Surg 2007; 18(4): 43-50.11- Denis F. The three column spine and its signifi-cance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 1983; 8(8): 817-831.12- Denis F, Armstrong GWD, Searls K, Matta L. Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the abcence of neurologic deficit. Clin Orthop 1984; 189:142-149.13- Erturer E, Tezer M, Ozturk I, Kuzgun U. Evalua-tion of vertebral fractures and associated injuries in adults. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2004; 39(5): 387-390.14- Fielding JW, Hawkins RJ. Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation. Fixed rotatory subluxation of the atlanto-axial joint. J Bone Joint Surg 1977; 59-A(1): 37-44.15- Goldberg W, Mueller C, Panacek E, Tigges S, Hoff-man JR, Mower WR. Distribution and patterns of blunt trau-matic cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38: 17-21.16- Greene KA, Dickman CA, Marciano FF, Dra-bier JB, Hadley MN, Sonntag VK. Acute axis fractures: analysi