Journals / JAREM / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Results of an Anatomical Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by the Anteromedial Method

Anteromedial Portal Tekniği ile Tek Demet Anatomik Ön Çapraz Bağ Rekonstrüksiyonu Sonuçlarımız

Journal
JAREM
Pages
88–93
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, early surgery will improve functional results because it will decrease the frequency of additional pathology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the results of patients undergoing single-bundle anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with the anteromedial portal technique and the effects of surgical timing on the results.Methods: A total of 47 patients (44 males, three females; mean age: 27 years) were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Lachman test, pivot shift test and KT- 2000 arthrometry, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm activity scoring were used in the preoperative and final follow-up in order to clinically evaluate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, early surgery will improve functional results because it will decrease the frequency of additional pathology.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the results of patients undergoing single-bundle anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with the anteromedial portal technique and the effects of surgical timing on the results.Methods: A total of 47 patients (44 males, three females; mean age: 27 years) were included in this study. Lachman test, pivot shift test and KT- 2000 arthrometry, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm activity scoring were used in the preoperative and final follow-up in order to clinically evaluate. Furthermore, 17 patients undergoing early surgery (within the first 6 months) and 30 patients undergoing late surgery were compared for the presence of additional pathologies and functional results.Results: The mean follow-up period was 25 months (range: 13-36 months). Lachman test, Pivot-shift test, KT-2000, Lysholm, and IKDC scores significantly improved during the final follow-up according to the preoperative values. Eighty-two percent (14/17) of patients in the early surgery group (ten medial, three lateral, and one bilateral) and 96% (29/30) of patients in the late surgery group (seventeen medial, five lateral, and seven bilateral) had meniscus tear, and the difference was statistically significant. Four patients requiring microfracture were present in the late surgery group. Functional outcome was better in patients in the early surgery group, although the difference was statistically not significant.Conclusion: Anatomical reconstruction of ACL with the anteromedial portal technique is an effective method to improve clinical and functional results. Additionally, early surgery will improve functional results because it will decrease the frequency of additional pathology.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı anteromedial (AM) portal yöntemi ile anatomik tek-demet ön çapraz bağ (ÖÇB) rekonstrüksiyonu uygulanan hastaların sonuçlarını ve cerrahi zamanının bu sonuçlara etkisini değerlendirmektir.Yöntemler: Hamstring tendonları kullanılarak anteromedial portal yoluyla tek demet anatomik ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonu uygulanan 47 hasta (44 erkek, 3 kadın; ortalama yaş 27 yıl) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Klinik olarak instabiliteyi değerlendirmek için preoperatif ve son kontrolde Lachman testi, Pivot shift testi ve KT-2000 artrometri cihazı kullanıldı. Ayrıca fonksiyonel sonuçları değerlendirmek için Uluslararası Diz Dokümantasyon Komite (IKDC) formu ve Lysholm aktivite skorlaması kullanıldı. Ayrıca erken cerrahi (ilk altı ay) uygulanan 17 hasta ve geç cerrahi uygulanan 30 hasta ek patoloji varlığı ve fonksiyonel sonuçlar açısından karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama takip süresi 25 aydı (dağılım 13-36 ay). Son kontrol muayenesi yapılan Lachman testi, Pivot shift testi, KT-2000, Lyshman ve IKDC skorları cerrahi öncesi değerlerine göre anlamlı şekilde düzeldi Yaralanma sonrası erken dönem (ort. 4,4 ay; dağılım 0,5-6 ay) ameliyat edilen 17 (%36,2) hastadan on dördünde menisküs yırtığı (on hastada medial, üç hastada lateral, bir hastada bilateral menisküs yırtığı) vardı. Altı aydan sonra (ort. 18,2 ay; dağılım 6-60 ay) ameliyat edilen 30 (%63,8) hastanın 29'unda menisküs yırtığı (17 medial menisküs yırtığı, beş hastada lateral ve yedi hastada bilateral menisküs yırtığı) gözlendi ve fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı idi. Mikrokırık uygulanması gereken dört hastada geç cerrahi grubunda idi. Erken cerrahi uygulanan hastaların fonksiyonel sonuçları daha iyi olmasına karşın fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi.Sonuç: Anteromedial portal tekniği ile anatomik ÖÇB rekonstrüksiyonu sadece ön-arka değil rotasyonel stabiliteyi de arttırmakla birlikte fonksiyonel iyileşmeyi anlamlı şekilde iyileştiren etkili bir yöntemdir. Bunun yanında erken cerrahi uygulanması ilave patoloji sıklığını azaltacağından dolayı fonksiyonel iyileşmeyi arttıracaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİNKAYA, E., MUTLU, H., YAVUZ, U., GÜL, M., ÇETİN, Ü., ÖZKAYA, U. (2016). Results of an Anatomical Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by the Anteromedial Method. JAREM, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 88–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/204434

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG. Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Crawford C, Nyland J, Landes S, Jackson R, Chang HC, Nawab A, et al. Anatomic double bundleACL reconstruction: a literature review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Gadikota HR, Seon JK, Kozanek M, Oh LS, Gill TJ, Montgomery KD, et al. Biomechanical comparison of single-tunnel-doublebundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 2009
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K, Amis AA. Biomechanical comparisons of knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2 clinically available transtibial procedures: anatomic double bundle versus single bundle. Am J Sports Med 2010
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Kuriwaka M, Ito Y. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: single-versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004
  6. Calvisi V, Lupparelli S, Rinonapoli G, Padua R. Single-bundle versus double bundle arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: what does the available evidence suggest? J Orthop Traumatol 2007
  7. Kanaya A, Ochi M, Deie M, Adachi N, Nishimori M, Nakamae A. Intraoperative evaluation of anteroposterior and rotational stabilities in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: lower femoral tunnel placed single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D, Lubowitz JH. Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2008
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Martins CAQ, Kropf EJ, Shen W, Van Eck CF, Fu FH. The concept of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Sports Med 2008
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Siebold R, Cafaltzis K. Differentiation between intraoperative and postoperative bone tunnel widening and communication in doublebundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study. Arthroscopy 2010
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Arnold MP, Kooloos J, Van Kampen A. Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arth