Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 1

Our Experiences about Reconstruction of the Tip Amputations

Pages
46–48
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Functional reconstruction should be performed in such tip amputation injuries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Hand injuries typically need reconstruction in plastic surgery practice. (1) Tip region is the most injured area.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this study, the retrospective analysis of the 625 patients, who were operated because of tip amputation in our clinic between the years of 2013-2017, was carried out.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Functional reconstruction should be performed in such tip amputation injuries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Hand injuries typically need reconstruction in plastic surgery practice. (1) Tip region is the most injured area. Hand injuries mostly arise from traumas. Methods: In this study, the retrospective analysis of the 625 patients, who were operated because of tip amputation in our clinic between the years of 2013-2017, was carried out. The patients were not eligible for replantation. Results: The cause of the traumas was mostly industrial injuries. Finger jam was the common cause in the pediatric population. Composite grafts were used in cases with torn fingers (60%). Locoregional flaps and free flaps were applied in cases which had no torn fingers. Discussion and Conclusion: Reconstruction of hand injuries is very important because of the feeling, touching, grasping and holding functions of the hand. Functional reconstruction should be performed in such tip amputation injuries.

🔖

Cite This Article

İSKENDEROĞLU, A. İ., ÇİLOĞLU, N. S., YİĞİT, A. K., OMAR, S. (2020). Our Experiences about Reconstruction of the Tip Amputations. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 1, 46–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/203546

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Sebastin SJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:723–37
  2. Bickel KD, Dosanjh A. Fingertip reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 2008;33:1417–9
  3. Dadaci M, Ince B, Altuntas Z, Bitik O, Kamburoglu HO, Uzun H. Assesment of Survival Rates Compared According to the Tamai and Yamano Classifications in Fingertip Replantations. Indian J Orthop 2016;50:384–9
  4. Braun M, Horton RC, Snelling CF. Fingertip amputation: review of 100 digits. Can J Surg 1985;28:72–5
  5. Söderberg T, Nyström A, Hallmans G, Hultén J. Treatment of fingertip amputations with bone exposure. A comparative study between surgical and conservative treatment methods. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;17:147–52. 6. van den Berg WB, Vergeer RA, van der Sluis CK, Ten Duis HJ, Werker PM.Comparison of three types of treatment modalities on the outcome of fingertip injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;72:1681–7
  6. Elsahy NI. When to replant a fingertip after its complete amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;60:14–21
  7. Rose EH, Norris MS, Kowalski TA, Lucas A, Fleegler EJ. The “cap” technique: nonmicrosurgical reattachment of fingertip amputations. J Hand Surg Am 1989;14:513–8
  8. KUTLER W. A new method for fingertip amputations. J Am Med Assoc 1947;133:29
  9. Atasoy E, Ioakimidis E, Kasdan ML, Kutz JE, Kleinert HE. Reconstruction of the amputated finger tip with a triangular volar flap. A new surgical procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52:921–6
  10. Allen MJ. Conservative management of finger tip injuries in adults. Hand 1980;12:257–65.