Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 4

Our Experiences about Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Pages
367–369
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is widely accepted and it has low complication rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second frequent compression syndrome of the upper extremities after carpal tunnel syndrome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We retrospectively examined 30 patients who had been operated because of the cubital tunnel syndrome between November 2009 and April 2013 in our clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is widely accepted and it has low complication rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second frequent compression syndrome of the upper extremities after carpal tunnel syndrome. Numbness of the ulnar nerve distribution is the most experienced symptom in the patients. Surgery is necessary for patients whose symptoms persist with nonoperative treatments. We use fascial flap and subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve to treat cubital tunnel syndrome in our clinic. In this study, our aim is to examine and report long-time results of these patients. Methods: We retrospectively examined 30 patients who had been operated because of the cubital tunnel syndrome between November 2009 and April 2013 in our clinic. Results: There were 18 female (60%), and 12 male (40%) patients between the age of 35-67. In 10% of the patients, electrophysiological findings became normal after the postoperative six months. In 60% of the patients, electrophysiological findings became normal after the postoperative 18 months. In 10% of the patients, there were no differences after postoperative 18 months, and in 20% of the patients, electrophysiologic findings reduced from high level to middle level and from middle level to low level after postoperative 18 months. Discussion and Conclusion: Fascial flap and subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is a very effective and reliable surgical procedure. It is widely accepted and it has low complication rates.

🔖

Cite This Article

İSKENDEROĞLU, A. İ., ÇİLOĞLU, N. S., ÇİN, B. (2019). Our Experiences about Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 4, 367–369. https://ajindex.com/articles/172812

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Zimmerman RM, Jupiter JB, Gonzalez del Pino J. Minimum 6-year follow-up after ulnar nerve decompression and submscular transposition for primary antrampment. J Hand Surg 2013
  2. 2398–404. [CrossRef ] 2. Krooneen LT. Cubital tunnel syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am 2012
  3. 475–86. [CrossRef ] 3. Gökay NS, Bagatur AE. Subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2012
  4. 243–9 [CrossRef ] 4. Henry M. Modified intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. J Hand Surg Am 2006
  5. 1535–42. [CrossRef ] 5. Tada H, Hirayama T, Katsuki M, Habaguchi T. Long term results using a modified King’s method for cubital tunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997
  6. 107–10. [CrossRef ] 6. Artico M, Pastore FS, Nucci F, Giuffre R. 290 surgical procedures for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow: physiopathology, clinical experiences and results. Acta Neurochir 2000
  7. 303–8. [CrossRef ] 7. Nouhan R, Kleinert JM. Ulnar nerve decompression by transposing the nerve and Z-lengthening the flexor-pronator mass: clinical outcome. J Hand Surg 1997
  8. 127–31. [CrossRef ] 8. Brauer CA, Graham B. The surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: a decision analysis. J Hand Surg European Vol 2007
  9. 654–62. [CrossRef ] 9. Liu CH, Chen CX, Xu J, Wang HL, Ke XB, Zhuang ZY et al. Anterior Subcutaneous versus submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015
  10. e0130843. [CrossRef ] 10. Bartels Rh, Menovsky T, Van Overbeeke JJ, Verhagen WI. Surgical management of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow: an analysis of the literature. J Neurosurg 1998
  11. 722–7. [CrossRef ] 11. Mowlavi A, Andrews K, Lille S, Verhulst S, Zook EG, Milner S. The management of cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta- analysis of clinical studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000
  12. 327–34. 12. Black BT, Barron OA, Townsend PF, Glickel SZ, Eaton RG. Stabilized subcutaneous unlar nerve transposition with immediate range of motion. Long-term follow-up. J Bone Surg Am 2000
  13. 82A:1544–51. [CrossRef ] 13. Chan RC, Paine KW, Varughese G. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: comparison of simple decompression and anterior transposition. Neurosurgery 1980
  14. 545–50. [CrossRef ] 14. Hamidreza A, Saeid A, Mohammadreza D, Zohreh Z, Mehdi S. Anterior subcutaneous transposition of ulnar nerve with faascial flap and complete excision of medial intermuscular septum in cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective patient