✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
This lost of artifacts and buildings damaged to the historical nature and tourism potential of the region.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Istanbul, at 1956, was of vital importance for the 1957 election with his population over 1 million.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the same year, according to Prime Minister Adnan Menderes “to landscape Istanbul, to build new squares and new roads” wide construction movement in Istanbul begun.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This lost of artifacts and buildings damaged to the historical nature and tourism potential of the region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İstanbul imarı · tarihi eser kaybı · Turizm
Abstract
Istanbul, at 1956, was of vital importance for the 1957 election with his population over 1 million. Within the same year, according to Prime Minister Adnan Menderes “to landscape Istanbul, to build new squares and new roads” wide construction movement in Istanbul begun. Some of this buildings and artifacts are totally destroyed, some are partially damaged and some are transported to unsuitable places. Hence, most of the artifacts and buildings are lost in the region that could be used as a “destination”. This lost of artifacts and buildings damaged to the historical nature and tourism potential of the region.
Keywords
🔖
Cite This Article
ERTEM, B., ALTUNEL, M. C. (2011). ASSESSMENT OF THE LOSS OF HISTORICAL ARTIFACTS DURING STANBUL RECONSTRUCTION WORK IN TERMS OF HISTORY AND TOURISM: KARAKÖY-KABATA REGION. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4, 61–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/203224