SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 600

The Analysis of Fiscal Illusion in Turkey

Türkı̇ye'de Malı̇ İllüzyon Varlığının Analı̇z Edı̇lmesi

ÖZGE UYSAL ŞAHİN
SEVDA AKAR
Pages
27–35
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the existence of fiscal illusion is examined for the period of 2006 January -2014 September with the Error Correction Model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fiscal illusion is the case where the indirect financing of budget deficit (especi- ally with increasing in indirect taxes) increases the citizens’ demand of public go- ods and services by reducing the perceived costs of public goods and services and so, the increase in public expenditures is seen in this situation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fiscal illusi- on highlighted by Buchanan and Wagner (1977) did not create much controversy in the literature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the existence of fiscal illusion is examined for the period of 2006 January -2014 September with the Error Correction Model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fiscal illusion is the case where the indirect financing of budget deficit (especi- ally with increasing in indirect taxes) increases the citizens’ demand of public go- ods and services by reducing the perceived costs of public goods and services and so, the increase in public expenditures is seen in this situation. Fiscal illusi- on highlighted by Buchanan and Wagner (1977) did not create much controversy in the literature. There is rarely any study testing fiscal illusion in Turkey. In this study, the existence of fiscal illusion is examined for the period of 2006 January -2014 September with the Error Correction Model.

Özet

Mali illüzyon,bütçe açığının dolaylı finansmanının (özellikle dolaylı vergilerin artı- şı), kamu mal ve hizmetlerinin algılanan maliyetini azaltarak vatandaşların kamu mal ve hizmetlere olan talebinin arttırmasını ve bu durumda kamu harcamaları- nın yükselmesini ifade etmektedir. Buchanan ve Wagner (1977)’in öne sürdüğü mali illüzyon literatürde çok geniş yer bulmuş bir kavram değildir. Türkiye’de de mali illüzyonu test eden çalışma neredeyse yok denecek kadar azdır. Bu çalış- mada Türkiye’de mali illüzyonun varlığı Ocak 2006 - Eylül 2014 dönemi için Hata Düzeltme Modeli kullanılarak incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, Ö. U., AKAR, S. (2015). The Analysis of Fiscal Illusion in Turkey. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 600, 27–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/202384

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AKÇORAOĞLU, Alpaslan; (1999). “Kamu Harcamaları, Kamu Gelirleri ve Keynesçi Politikalar: Bir Nedensellik Analizi, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 2,ss. 51-65.
  2. BARUA, Shubhasish; (2005), “An Examination of Revenue and Expenditure Causality in Bangladesh: 1974-2004”, Bangladesh Bank Policy Analysis Unit Working Paper Series, No: WP 0605, December. BUCHANAN, James ve Richard WAGNER; (1977), Democ- racy in Deficit,AcademicPress,
  3. New York. BUCHANAN, James; (1960), Fiscal Theory and Political Economy,The University of North Carolina Press,
  4. Chapel Hill. ÇAKMUR YILDIRTAN, Dina; (2010), E-Views Uygulamalı Temel Ekonometri: Makro Ekonomik Verilerle, Türkmen Kitape- vi, İstanbul, ISBN: 978–605–4259–18–2. ÇAVUŞOĞLU, A. Tarkan; (2008), “Türkiye’de Kamu Gelirleri ve Harcamaları Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, Nisan, ss.143-160.
  5. DARRAT, Ali F.; (1998), “Tax and Spend, or Spend and Tax? An Inquiry into the Turkish Budgetary Process”, Southern Eco- nomic Journal, 64 (4), April, pp.940-956.
  6. DAS, Amaresh ve Adnan OMAR; (2014), “Fiscal Illusion – Does It Exist? An Econometric Evaluation”, International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 3 (3), April, pp.136- 140. DOLLERY, Brian E. ve Andrew C. WORTHİNGTON; (1996), “The Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Illusion”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 10 (3). pp.261–297. EĞİLMEZ, Mahfi; (2011), “İllüzyon”, Kendime Yazılar, http:// www.mahfiegilmez.com/2011/12/illuzyon.html FRIEDMAN, Milton; (1978), “The Limitations of Tax Limitation”, Policy Review, pp.7-14.
  7. GEMMELL, Norman, Oliver MORRISSEY ve Abuzer PINAR; (1999),“Fiscal Illusion and the Demand for Government Expen- ditures in the UK” European Journal of Political Economy, 15, pp.687–704 GÜNAYDIN, İhsan; (2000), “Türkiye’de Kamu Gelirleri ve Kamu Harcamaları Arasındaki Nedensel İlişki”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 5(1), ss. 55-74
  8. GÜNAYDIN, İhsan; (2004), “Vergi-Harcama Tartışması: Tür- kiye Örneği”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 5 (2), ss.163-181
  9. HOOVER, Kevin D. ve Steven M. SHEFFRIN; (1992),“Causa- tion, Spending and Taxes: Sand in the Sandbox or Tax Collec- tor for the Welfare State?”, American Economic Review, 82 (1), March, pp.225–248. JOHANSEN, Saren; (1988), “Statistical Analysis of Cointegrat- ing Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, pp. 231–254. KONSTANTINOU,Panagiotis T.; (2004) “Balancing the Bud- get through Revenue or Spending Adjustments? The Case of Greece”, J