Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 6

Geological, petrological, and geodynamical characteristics of the Karacaali Magmatic Complex (Kırıkkale) in the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex, Turkey

Pages
645–667
Publication Date
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, this model is open to discussion and needs to be investigated using isotope data in future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mafic and felsic igneous rocks in the Karacaali Magmatic Complex (KMC) in the northwestern margin of the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex (CACC) are classified into 4 groups: i) granitoid pluton including granite, granodiorite, and monzonite; ii) a few meter-scale porphyritic microgranite enclaves within the hybrid rocks; iii) hybrid rocks formed by mixing/mingling of mafic lavas (basaltic/diabasic/lamprophyric), anorthositic, and/or rhyolitic lavas; iv) diabasic dykes/veins within the granitoid pluton.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These rocks are mainly peraluminous with aluminum saturation index > 1, but mainly between 1 and 1.1, indicating transitional peraluminous.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, this model is open to discussion and needs to be investigated using isotope data in future studies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Granite · lamprophyre · mantle

Abstract

Mafic and felsic igneous rocks in the Karacaali Magmatic Complex (KMC) in the northwestern margin of the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex (CACC) are classified into 4 groups: i) granitoid pluton including granite, granodiorite, and monzonite; ii) a few meter-scale porphyritic microgranite enclaves within the hybrid rocks; iii) hybrid rocks formed by mixing/mingling of mafic lavas (basaltic/diabasic/lamprophyric), anorthositic, and/or rhyolitic lavas; iv) diabasic dykes/veins within the granitoid pluton. Major element composition of the granitoid pluton and porphyritic microgranite enclaves within the hybrid rocks indicate subalkaline, calc-alkaline, and mostly I-type characteristics. These rocks are mainly peraluminous with aluminum saturation index > 1, but mainly between 1 and 1.1, indicating transitional peraluminous. On the tectonomagmatic discrimination diagrams (Y vs. Nb and (Y+Nb) vs. Rb diagrams), all the granitic and monzonitic rock suites from the complex fall mostly in the VAG+Syn-COLG and VAG fields respectively, suggesting arc-related origin. On the R1 vs. R2 tectonic diagram, the granitic rocks display distribution from preplate collision to syncollision field, but quartz-monzonitic samples plot within the postcollision uplift field. Based on limited geological, petrographic, and geochemical results, the tectonomagmatic evolution of the KMC can be summarized as follow: i) initiation of subduction of the Inner Tauride oceanic lithosphere beneath the CACC during the Late Cretaceous time; ii) underplating of partial melts derived from subducted slab and/or mantle wedge, which provided enough heat for partial melting of the mafic lower crust and generation of granitic magma; iii) slab detachment following the continentcontinent collision that resulted in tensional forces within the overlying continental crust, which allowed the intrusion of the granitic magma to the upper crust, also cutting the central Anatolian ophiolites, from the Late Cretaceous to most likely the Paleocene time. The hybrid rocks formed by mixing/mingling of the mafic, anorthositic, and/or rhyolitic magmas most likely indicate their injection into a partly crystalline granitic magmatic system just after crystallization of granitic magma in the upper crust. However, this model is open to discussion and needs to be investigated using isotope data in future studies.

Özet

Mafic and felsic igneous rocks in the Karacaali Magmatic Complex (KMC) in the northwestern margin of the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex (CACC) are classified into 4 groups: i) granitoid pluton including granite, granodiorite, and monzonite; ii) a few meter-scale porphyritic microgranite enclaves within the hybrid rocks; iii) hybrid rocks formed by mixing/mingling of mafic lavas (basaltic/diabasic/lamprophyric), anorthositic, and/or rhyolitic lavas; iv) diabasic dykes/veins within the granitoid pluton. Major element composition of the granitoid pluton and porphyritic microgranite enclaves within the hybrid rocks indicate subalkaline, calc-alkaline, and mostly I-type characteristics. These rocks are mainly peraluminous with aluminum saturation index > 1, but mainly between 1 and 1.1, indicating transitional peraluminous. On the tectonomagmatic discrimination diagrams (Y vs. Nb and (Y+Nb) vs. Rb diagrams), all the granitic and monzonitic rock suites from the complex fall mostly in the VAG+Syn-COLG and VAG fields respectively, suggesting arc-related origin. On the R1 vs. R2 tectonic diagram, the granitic rocks display distribution from preplate collision to syncollision field, but quartz-monzonitic samples plot within the postcollision uplift field. Based on limited geological, petrographic, and geochemical results, the tectonomagmatic evolution of the KMC can be summarized as follow: i) initiation of subduction of the Inner Tauride oceanic lithosphere beneath the CACC during the Late Cretaceous time; ii) underplating of partial melts derived from subducted slab and/or mantle wedge, which provided enough heat for partial melting of the mafic lower crust and generation of granitic magma; iii) slab detachment following the continentcontinent collision that resulted in tensional forces within the overlying continental crust, which allowed the intrusion of the granitic magma to the upper crust, also cutting the central Anatolian ophiolites, from the Late Cretaceous to most likely the Paleocene time. The hybrid rocks formed by mixing/mingling of the mafic, anorthositic, and/or rhyolitic magmas most likely indicate their injection into a partly crystalline granitic magmatic system just after crystallization of granitic magma in the upper crust. However, this model is open to discussion and needs to be investigated using isotope data in future studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELİTOK, Ö., ÖZDAMAR, Ş., BACAK, G., UZ, B. (2014). Geological, petrological, and geodynamical characteristics of the Karacaali Magmatic Complex (Kırıkkale) in the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 6, 645–667. https://ajindex.com/articles/202134

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akıman O, Erler A, Göncüoğlu MC, Güleç N, Geven A, Türeli TK, Kadıoğlu YK (1993). Geochemical characteristics of granitoids along the western margin of the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex and their tectonic implications. Geol J 28: 371–382.
  2. Akıncı AC (2008). Yahşihan (Kırıkkale) ve civarının tektono- stratigrafisi. MSc, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey (in Turkish). Alpaslan M, Boztuğ D, Frei R, Temel A, Kurt MA (2006). Geochemical and Pb–Sr–Nd isotopic composition of the ultrapotassic volcanic rocks from the extension-related Çamardı-Ulukışla basin, Niğde Province, Central Anatolia, Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci 27: 613–627.
  3. Atherton MP, Ghani AA (2002). Slab breakoff: a model for Caledonian, Late Granite syn-collisional magmatism in the orthotectonic (metamorphic) zone of Scotland and Donegal, Ireland. Lithos 62: 65– 85. Awdankiewicz M (2007). Late Palaeozoic lamprophyres and associated mafic subvolcanic rocks of the Sudetes (SW Poland): petrology, geochemistry and petrogenesis. Geologica Sudetica 39: 11–97.
  4. Barbarin B (1999). A review of the relationships between granitoid types, their origins and their geodynamic environments. Lithos 46: 605–626.
  5. Batchelor RA, Bowden P (1985). Petrogenetic interpretation of granitoid rock series using multicationic parameters. Chem Geol 48: 43–55.
  6. Bea F, Montero P, Molina J (1999). Mafic precursors, peraluminous granitoids, and late lamprophyres in the Avila batholith: a model for the generation of Variscan Batholiths in Iberia. J Geol 107: 399–419.
  7. Bonin B (2007). A-type granites and related rocks: evolution of a concept, problems and prospects. Lithos 97: 1–29.
  8. Bozkurt E (2001). Neotectonics of Turkey-a synthesis. Geodin Acta 14: 3–30.
  9. Boztuğ D (1998). Post-collisional central Anatolian alkaline plutonism, Turkey. Turk J Earth Sci 7: 145–165.
  10. Boztuğ D (2000). S-I-A-type intrusive associations: geodynamic significance of synchronism between metamorphism and magmatism in Central Anatolia, Turkey. In: Bozkurt E, Winchester JA, Piper JDA, editors. Tectonics and Magmatism in Turkey and the Surrounding Area. J Geol Soc London Special Publications 173: 441–458.
  11. Boztuğ D, Arehart GB (2007). Oxygen and sulfur isotope geochemistry revealing a significant crustal signature in the genesis of the post- collisional granitoids, in central Anatolia, Turkey. J Asian Earth Sci 30: 403–416.
  12. Boztuğ D, Güney Ö, Heizler M, Jonckheere RC, Tichomirowa M, Otlu N (2009).
  13. Pb- Pb, Ar- Ar and Fission-track geothermochronology quantifying coo