Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4

Mineralogical and physicochemical properties of talc from Emirdağ, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey

Pages
632–644
Publication Date
2013-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry, chemical analysis, and Mössbauer spectroscopy results show that iron in the Emirdağ samples was mainly derived from talc minerals and this iron occurs as Fe+2 in the crystal lattice structure of talc.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lens-shaped talc deposits related to Mesozoic gabbroic rocks are exposed in an area of 2 km2, about 80 km northwest of Afyonkarahisar (western Anatolia).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Four groups of mineral paragenesis were determined: i) talc and chlorite-bearing actinolite (E1), ii) actinolite-rich talc (E-2), iii) chlorite and calcite-bearing talc (E-3), and iv) pure talc (E-4).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry, chemical analysis, and Mössbauer spectroscopy results show that iron in the Emirdağ samples was mainly derived from talc minerals and this iron occurs as Fe+2 in the crystal lattice structure of talc.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Talc · mineralogy · FT-IR

Abstract

Lens-shaped talc deposits related to Mesozoic gabbroic rocks are exposed in an area of 2 km2, about 80 km northwest of Afyonkarahisar (western Anatolia). Different alteration zones in talc deposits were determined depending on differences related to the texture and color of the host rock. In order to determine mineralogical, geochemical, and physicochemical features of the Emirdağ talc deposits, X-ray diffractometer, scanning electron microscope (SEM), FT-IR and Mössbauer spectroscopy, differential thermogravimetric analyses, BET-specific surface area, color, water soluble substance, acid-soluble carbonate, and acid-soluble iron tests were performed on the samples collected from different alteration zones in the lateral direction. Four groups of mineral paragenesis were determined: i) talc and chlorite-bearing actinolite (E1), ii) actinolite-rich talc (E-2), iii) chlorite and calcite-bearing talc (E-3), and iv) pure talc (E-4). Talc, actinolite, and chlorite are dominant. SEM analyses show that fine shreds, like microcrystalline talc crystals, are associated mainly with actinolite and chlorite, and actinolites are mainly transformed into chlorite and talc. Ni and Cr contents of the Emirdağ talcs are consistent with the composition of the talc deposits formed in relation to ultramafic rocks. Energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry, chemical analysis, and Mössbauer spectroscopy results show that iron in the Emirdağ samples was mainly derived from talc minerals and this iron occurs as Fe+2 in the crystal lattice structure of talc. Because removal of iron from Emirdağ talc seems difficult during mineral processing techniques, the Emirdağ talc can be used in its crude state in the cosmetic, paint, and paper industries as a secondary raw material.

Özet

Lens-shaped talc deposits related to Mesozoic gabbroic rocks are exposed in an area of 2 km2, about 80 km northwest of Afyonkarahisar (western Anatolia). Different alteration zones in talc deposits were determined depending on differences related to the texture and color of the host rock. In order to determine mineralogical, geochemical, and physicochemical features of the Emirdağ talc deposits, X-ray diffractometer, scanning electron microscope (SEM), FT-IR and Mössbauer spectroscopy, differential thermogravimetric analyses, BET-specific surface area, color, water soluble substance, acid-soluble carbonate, and acid-soluble iron tests were performed on the samples collected from different alteration zones in the lateral direction. Four groups of mineral paragenesis were determined: i) talc and chlorite-bearing actinolite (E1), ii) actinolite-rich talc (E-2), iii) chlorite and calcite-bearing talc (E-3), and iv) pure talc (E-4). Talc, actinolite, and chlorite are dominant. SEM analyses show that fine shreds, like microcrystalline talc crystals, are associated mainly with actinolite and chlorite, and actinolites are mainly transformed into chlorite and talc. Ni and Cr contents of the Emirdağ talcs are consistent with the composition of the talc deposits formed in relation to ultramafic rocks. Energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry, chemical analysis, and Mössbauer spectroscopy results show that iron in the Emirdağ samples was mainly derived from talc minerals and this iron occurs as Fe+2 in the crystal lattice structure of talc. Because removal of iron from Emirdağ talc seems difficult during mineral processing techniques, the Emirdağ talc can be used in its crude state in the cosmetic, paint, and paper industries as a secondary raw material.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERSOY, B., DİKMEN, S., YILDIZ, A., GÖREN, R., ELİTOK, Ö. (2013). Mineralogical and physicochemical properties of talc from Emirdağ, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 4, 632–644. https://ajindex.com/articles/213184

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Billmeyer, F.W. & Saltzman, M. 1981. Principles of Color Technology. Wiley Interscience, New York. Bizi, M., Flament, M.P., Baudet, G. & Gayot, A. 2003. Relation between structural characteristics of talc and its properties as an antisticking agent in the production of tablets. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 19, 373–379.
  2. Brown, G. 1972. X–Ray Identification and Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals. Mineral Society, London. Bundy, W.M. & Ishley, J.N. 1991. Kaolin in paper filling and coating. Applied Clay Science 5, 397–420.
  3. Chung, F.H., 1974. Quantitative interpretation of X-ray diffraction patterns of mixtures. II. Adiabatic principle of X-ray diffraction analysis of mixtures. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 7, 526– 5 Ciullo, P.A. & Robinson, S. 2003. Talc (shape and form meet function). Paint & Coatings Industry 19, 30–34.
  4. Çoban, F. 2004. Mineralogical-geochemical characteristics of Gümeli (İvrindi-Balıkesir) talc occurrences. Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (in Turkish with English abstract). Doğan, A.Ü., Doğan, M., Onal, M., Sarikaya, Y., Aburub, A. & Wurster, D.E. 2006. Baseline studies of the Clay Minerals Society source clays: specific surface area by the Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) method. Clays and Clay Minerals 54, 62– Deer, W.A., Howie, R.A. & Zussman, J. 1992. An Introduction to the Rock-Forming Minerals. Longman Scientific & Technical, Essex, UK. DPT. 2007. 9th Development Plan for 5 Years, The Report of the Special Commission of Mining. DPT, Ankara (in Turkish). El-Sharkawy, M.F. 2000. Talc mineralization of ultramafic affinity in the Eastern Desert of Egypt. Mineralium Deposita 35, 346–363.
  5. Farmer, V.C. 1974. The layer silicates. In: Farmer, V.C. (ed), The Infrared Spectra of Minerals. Mineralogical Society, London, 331–363.
  6. Ferrage, E., Martin, F., Petit, S., Pejo-Soucaille, S., Micoud, P., Fourty, G., Ferret, J., Salvi, S., Parseval, P. & Fotune, J.P. 2003. Evaluation of talc morphology using FT-IR and H/D substitution. Clay Minerals 38, 141–150.
  7. Gamiz, E., Melgosab, M., Sanchez-Maranon, M., Martin M.J.M. & Delgadoa, R. 2005. Relationships between chemicomineralogical composition and color properties in selected natural and calcined Spanish kaolins. Applied Clay Science 28, 269–282.
  8. Gill, A., Korili, S.A., Trujillano, R.M. & Vicente A. 2011. A review on characterization of pillared clays by specific techniques. Applied Clay Science 53, 97–105.
  9. Gonçalves, M.A., Jesus, F. and Garg, V.K. 1991