Journals / İzmir Dr. Behçet Uz Çocuk Hastanesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of the self and the proxy versions of the KIDSCREEN quality of life scale: To what extend can parents predict quality of life of their children?

KIDSCREEN yaşam kalitesi ölçeği özbildirim ve vekil ölçüm sonuçlarının karşılaştırması: Ebeveynler çocuklarının yaşam kalitesini ne kadar öngörebiliyor?

Pages
15–24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A good agreement was detected between self- and proxy ratings for the short version (KIDSCREEN-10).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the agreement between self and proxy responses of the KIDSCREEN health- related quality of life (HRQOL).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out on 662 children/adolescents aged between 8 to 18 years and 543 parents in 6 schools of Manisa city center, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A good agreement was detected between self- and proxy ratings for the short version (KIDSCREEN-10).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the agreement between self and proxy responses of the KIDSCREEN health- related quality of life (HRQOL). Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out on 662 children/adolescents aged between 8 to 18 years and 543 parents in 6 schools of Manisa city center, Turkey. In this study sociodemographic characteristics of the participants were determined, and KIDSCREEN quality of life questionnair forms were applied. Following descriptive findings, Pearson correlation analyses, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients and Bland-Altman graphs were performed in the statistical analyses so as to determine the association between basic descriptive findings, self-, and proxy responses. In addition Linear Regression analysis was performed in order to show the extend of proxy/parents' evaluations in the explanation of children's, and adolescents! HRQOL. Results: 49.4 %of the children were male; and mean age was 13.1±2.4 years. Correlation coefficients and ICCs of self and proxy HRQOL evaluations were between 0.27 to 0.52 ranging between 0.43 to 0.68 respectively for the various dimensions of the KIDSCREEN. The range of Determination coefficients (R2) for the prediction of self-ratings by proxy ratings were between 0.10 to 0.41 for different dimensions. Bland-Altman graph showed a sound distribution (majority of the values are between ±2 standard deviation limits) around zero line of the graph devoid of systematic error for both KIDSCREEN-52 physical well-being scale and KIDSCREEN-10. Conclusion: KIDSCREEN self- and proxy ratings showed a moderate level of correlation, and agreement. A significant disagreement was detected for bullying dimension between self- and proxy ratings. Parents overestimated HRQOL in the "moods and emotions" dimension compared to their children whereas children better perceived their physical well-being than their parents for the long version (KIDSCREEN-52). A good agreement was detected between self- and proxy ratings for the short version (KIDSCREEN-10).

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı KIDSCREEN sağlıkla ilişkili yaşam kalitesi (SYK) ölçeği öz bildirim yanıtları ile vekil yanıtları arasındaki uyumu karşılaştırmaktır. Yöntemler: Araştırma Manisa'da yer alan 6 okulda 8-18 yaş arası 662 çocuk/genç, 543 ebeveyn üzerinde yürütülmüş kesitsel bir araştırmadır. Araştırmada katılımcıların sosyodemografik özellikleri belirlenmiş ve KIDSCREEN yaşam kalitesi anketi uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın analizinde temel tanımlayıcı bulgular ile öz bildirim-vekil değerlendirmesinin birlikteliğini belirlemek için korelasyon analizi, sınıfiçi korelasyon katsayıları (Intraclass Correlation Coeffience, ICC), Bland-Altman grafiği incelenmiştir. Ayrıca çocuğun/gencin yaşam kalitesi puanlarını vekil/ebeveyn ölçümünün ne kadar açıklayabildiğini belirlemek için doğrusal regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Katılan çocukların %49,4'ü erkek, yaş ortalaması 13,1±2,4'tür. SYK öz bildirim ve vekil yanıtlarının korelasyon katsayısının 0,27 ile 0,52 arasında, ICC değerleri dağılımı ise 0,43 ile 0,68 arasındadır. Ebeveyn yanıtlarının çocuğun/gencin yaşam kalitesini öngörebilmedeki tanımlayıcılık katsayısının (R2) 0,10 ile 0,41 arasında belirlenmiştir. Bland-Altman grafiği KIDSCREEN-52 ve KIDSCREEN-10 için sistematik hatadan uzak, sıfırın etrafında dağılmakta ve ±2 standart sapma aralığı içerisinde yer almaktadır. Sonuç: KIDSCREEN yaşam kalitesi ölçeği öz bildirim-vekil sürümü orta düzeyde birliktelik ve uyum gösterdiği bulunmuştur. Ebeveyn-çocuk değerlendirmelerinde özellikle Sosyal kabul-zorbalık boyutunda tutarsızlık vardır. Uzun sürümde (KIDSCREEN-52), ebeveynler duygudurum ve duygulanım boyutunda çocuklarından daha yüksek skor verirken, çocuklar kendi bedensel iyilik durumlarını ebeveynlerinden daha olumlu algılamaktadırlar. İndeks sürümde (KIDSCREEN-10) ise çocuk-ebeveyn değerlendirmesi tutarlıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYDUR, H., ERGİN, D., GERÇEKLİOĞLU, G., ESER, E. (2016). Comparison of the self and the proxy versions of the KIDSCREEN quality of life scale: To what extend can parents predict quality of life of their children?. İzmir Dr. Behçet Uz Çocuk Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 15–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/200983

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Seid M, Varni J, Jacobs J. Pediatric Health-Related Quality- of-Life Measurement Technology: Intersections between Science, Managed Care, and Clinical Care. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2000;7(1):17-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009541218764
  2. Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Seid M, Skarr D. The PedsQL(TM)* 4.0 as a Pediatric Population Health Measure: Feasibility, Reliability, and Validity. Ambulatory Pediatrics 2003;3(6): 329-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003_____0329:TPAA PP>2.0.CO;2 Guyatt GH, Juniper EF, Griffith LE, Feeny DH, Ferrie PJ. Children and adult perceptions of childhood asthma. Pediatrics 1997;99(2):165-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.99.2.165
  3. Kozinetz CA, Warren RW, Berseth CL, Aday LA, Sachdeva R, Kirkland RT. Health status of children with special health care needs: measurement issues and instruments. Clinical Pediatrics 1999;38(9):525-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000992289903800905
  4. Bullinger M, Schmidt S, Petersen C. Assessing quality of life of children with chronic health conditions and disabilities: a European approach. International journal of rehabilitation research Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitations for schung Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation. 2002;25(3):197-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200209000-00005
  5. Matza LS, Swensen AR, Flood EM, Secnik K, Leidy NK. Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Children: A Review of Conceptual, Methodological, and Regulatory Issues. Value in Health 2004;7(1):79-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.71273.x
  6. Eiser C, Morse R. A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness. Arch Dis Child 2001;84(3):205- 211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.84.3.205
  7. Solans M, Pane S, Estrada M-D, Serra-Sutton V, Berra S, Herdman M, et al. Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: A systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments. Value in Health 2008;11(4): 742-764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00293.x
  8. Davis E, Waters E, Mackinnon A, Reddihough D, Graham HK, Mehmet-Radji O, et al. Paediatric quality of life instru- ments: a review of the impact of the conceptual framework on outcomes. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006;48(4):311-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0012162206000673
  9. De Civita M, Regier D, Alamgir AH, Anis AH, FitzGerald MJ, Marra CA. Evaluating health-related quality-of-life stu- dies in paediatric populations: Some conceptual, methodolo- gical and developmental con