Journals / Harita Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 73 - Sayı: 135

Monitoring crustal motions within earthquake areas

Deprem bölgelerinde yerkabuğu hareketlerinin izlenmesi

Pages
52–63
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Another test to determine the points, on which deformations occurred, was also made and the results of the different tests were compared and also analyzed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Earth's Crustal movements are determined by geodetic network methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With these intermediate results a final adjustment were made for each period, and also $\theta^2$ - testing was applied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Another test to determine the points, on which deformations occurred, was also made and the results of the different tests were compared and also analyzed.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Earth's Crustal movements are determined by geodetic network methods. Observations sets were first adjusted for the purpose of identification of gross errors. The results of this adjustment were accessed to test for the outliers and also model hypothesis were tested. During the adjustment of the identification of the blunders refraction parameters for the points of networks were also determined. Moreover the optimum estimates for the coordinates in the three - dimensional space were also determined by using the stochastical model of the data sets of three different measurements. With these intermediate results a final adjustment were made for each period, and also $\theta^2$ - testing was applied. Another test to determine the points, on which deformations occurred, was also made and the results of the different tests were compared and also analyzed.

Özet

Deprem bölgelerinde oluşan yerkabuğu hareketleri, jeodezik deformasyon ağları kurularak bu ağlarda yapılan yatay doğrultu, düşey açı, eğik uzunluk, yükseklik farkı ve yapay uydu gözlemlerinin farklı zamanlarda elde edilen değerleri eşdeğerlik testleri ile karşılaştırılarak belirlenmektedir. Farklı zamanlarda yapılan gözlemler, her ölçme periyodu için ayrı ayrı uygulanan tanı dengelemeleri ile değerlendirilir ve kaba hatalardan arındırılır. Karşılaştırılan ölçme periyotları arasında geçen zamanda bölgede istatistik yönden anlamlı bir deformasyon oluşup oluşmadığı $\theta^2$ - Testi uygulanarak belirlenir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, E., KONAK, H., ATASOY, V. (2006). Monitoring crustal motions within earthquake areas. Harita Dergisi, Cilt: 73 - Sayı: 135, 52–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/200244

References (10)

  1. Fubara, D.M.J. Three-Dimensional Adjustment of Terrestrial Geodetic Network. The Canadian Surveyor Sept. 1972.
  2. Heck, B., E.Kuntz,B.Meier-Hirmer, Deformationsanalyse Mittels Relativer Fehlerellipse, AVN 1977, 78-87.
  3. Koch, K.R. Ein Automatisches Testverfahren Zur Aufdeckung Von Punktverschiebungen Bei Der Deformationsanalyse. Int. Kurs Für Ingenieurvermessung, Zurich 1980.
  4. Mierlo van, J. A Testing Pocedure for Analysing Geodetic Deformation Measurements. Deformation Measurements by Geodetic Methods. FIG Symposium. Bonn 1978.
  5. Niemeier, W. Deformationanalyse. Geodätische Netze in Landes-und Ingenieurvermessung II. Stuttgart 1985.
  6. Öztürk, E., Atasoy, V., Konak, H. Erdkrusten Bewegungen in Nord Anatolischen Verwerfungszone. Int. Seminer on Earthquake Prognostic. Guangzhou – China 1989.
  7. Öztürk, E., Atasoy, V., Konak, H. Dreidimensionale Deformationsuntersuchungen in Nord Anatolischen Verwerfungszone. Int. Seminar on Earthquake Prognostic. Berlin 1991.
  8. Öztürk, E., Şerbetçi, M Dengeleme Hesabı Cilt III. KTÜ Yayınları Trabzon 1992. s.350-364.
  9. Pelzer, H. Zur Analyse Geodätischer Deformations Messungen. DGK C 164. München 1971.
  10. Wolf, H. Ausgleichungsrechnung, Formeln zur Praktischen Anwendung. Bonn 1975.