SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

LATE RESULTS OF OPEN DOOR LAMINOPLASTY FOR CERVICAL OSSIFYING POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT

SERVİKAL LONGİTUDİNAL LİGAMAN OSSİFİKASYONU İÇİN AÇIK KAPI LAMİNOPLASTİNİN GEÇ SONUÇLARI

Çetin AKYOL
Uyğur ER
Serkan ŞİMŞEK
Murad BAVBEK
Pages
103–108
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

That RR decreases as preoperative symptom duration increases is remarkable.Conclusions: ODL is an effective and safe way to reduce symptoms of degenerative cervical myelopathy due to OPLL

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In this prospectively designed study, it was planned to present an Open Door Laminoplasty (ODL) series, to discuss effectiveness of this approach and to investigate correlation between preoperative cervical canal cross-sectional area and recovery rate of patients.Patients and Method: A 47-patient group which had minimum 36 months follow-up was included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Preoperative and various postoperative times clinic and radiologic parameters were compared statistically, and recovery rates (RR) of patients were calculated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:That RR decreases as preoperative symptom duration increases is remarkable.Conclusions: ODL is an effective and safe way to reduce symptoms of degenerative cervical myelopathy due to OPLL
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: In this prospectively designed study, it was planned to present an Open Door Laminoplasty (ODL) series, to discuss effectiveness of this approach and to investigate correlation between preoperative cervical canal cross-sectional area and recovery rate of patients.Patients and Method: A 47-patient group which had minimum 36 months follow-up was included in the study. All patients were performed a standard ODL. Preoperative and various postoperative times clinic and radiologic parameters were compared statistically, and recovery rates (RR) of patients were calculated. Results: RR of patients was statistically significant by Friedman’s test. It cannot be found any statistical relation between preoperative cross sectional area (CSA) and preoperative clinic by statistical significance tests. That RR decreases as preoperative symptom duration increases is remarkable.Conclusions: ODL is an effective and safe way to reduce symptoms of degenerative cervical myelopathy due to OPLL

Özet

Giriş: İleri dönük olarak planlanmış bu çalışmada, açık kapı laminoplasti (ODL) hasta dizisi sunularak, bu yaklaşımın etkinliği ve ameliyat öncesi kanal alanı ile hastaların belirti ve bulguları arasında ilişki olup olmadığının araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Hastalar ve yöntem: En az 36 ay takip edilmiş 47 hastalık bir topluluk çalışmaya alınmıştır. Tüm hastalara standart ODL yapılmıştır ODL. Ameliyat öncesi ve ameliyat sonrası çeşitli zamanlarda klinik ve radyolojik sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak karşılaştırılmışlardır. Hastaların iyileşme oranları hesaplanmıştır. Sonuçlar: Hastaların iyileşme oranları Friedman testi ile istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu. Ameliyat öncesi kanal alanı ile klinik arasında ilişki yoktu. Belirti ve bulgu süresi ile iyileşme oranı arasında ters ilişki olması dikkate değer bir durumdur. Çıkarım: ODL, OPLL nedeni ile gelişen servikal dar kanalda belirti ve bulguların giderilmesi için etkin ve güvenli bir yaklaşımdır

🔖

Cite This Article

AKYOL, Ç., ER, U., ŞİMŞEK, S., BAVBEK, M. (2017). LATE RESULTS OF OPEN DOOR LAMINOPLASTY FOR CERVICAL OSSIFYING POSTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 103–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/199949

References (12)

  1. An HS, Al-Shihabi L, Kurd M. Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22: 420–429
  2. Baron EM, Young WF. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a brief review of its pathophysiology, clinical course, and diagnosis. Neurosurgery 2007; 60(Suppl. -1): 35-41
  3. Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Hadden T. Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 1991; 4: 286-295
  4. Chen Y, Yang L, Liu Y, Yang H, Wang X, Chen D. Surgical results and prognostic factors of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. PLoS One 2014; 9(7): e102008
  5. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 1983; 8(7): 693-699
  6. Hirabayashi K, Bohlman HH. Multilevel cervical spondylosis. Laminoplasty versus anterior decompression. Spine 1995; 20:1732–1734
  7. Hirabayashi S, Yamada H, Motosuneya T, Watanabe Y, Miura M, Sakai H, Matsushita T. Comparison of enlargement of the spinal canal after cervical laminoplasty: open-door type and double-door type. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 1690–1694
  8. Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K. Longterm results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg 2002; 96: 180–189
  9. Liu X, Chen Y, Yang H, Li T, Xu B, Chen D. Expansive open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and instrumented fusion for cases with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and straight lordosis. Eur Spine J 2016; doi 10.1007/s00586-016-4912-7 10. Mandal S, Banerjee U, Mukherjee AS, Mandal S, Kundu S. Analysis of the outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, undergone canal expansive laminoplasty supported with instrumentation in a group of Indian population – a prospective study. Int J Spine Surg 2016; 10: 17
  10. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Taketomi E, Yamaguchi M, Okano T. The natural course of myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 305: 168-177
  11. Oyama M, Hattori S, Moriwaki N. A new method of cervical laminectomy. Cntrl Jpn Orthop Traumat Surg 1973; 16: 792–794
  12. Su N, Fei Q, Wang B, Li D, Li J, Meng H, Yang Y, Guo A. Long-term outcomes and prognostic analysis of