Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 2

Sezaryende Ultrason Eşliğinde Yapılan Transversus Abdominis Plan Bloğun Postoperatif Analjezik Tüketimine Etkisi

The effect of ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block for caesarean delivery on postoperative analgesic consumption

Pages
121–124
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In our study USG-TAP block provided effective postoperative analgesia and we consider this technique as a safe and effective method for postoperative pain control after caesarean delivery

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In our study we evaluated the postoperative analgesic consumption and analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane (USG-TAP) block in patients undergoing caesarean section (CS).Seventy ASA I-II patients undergoing CS following spinal anaesthesia were included in our study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were divided into two groups randomly: Group T (TAP Block group) (n:35) and Group C (Control group) (n:35).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In our study USG-TAP block provided effective postoperative analgesia and we consider this technique as a safe and effective method for postoperative pain control after caesarean delivery
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In our study we evaluated the postoperative analgesic consumption and analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane (USG-TAP) block in patients undergoing caesarean section (CS).Seventy ASA I-II patients undergoing CS following spinal anaesthesia were included in our study. The patients were divided into two groups randomly: Group T (TAP Block group) (n:35) and Group C (Control group) (n:35). At the end of the surgery. Group T patients received USG-TAP block using 20 ml of 0.25% levobubivacaine. All participants received standart analgesic regime of tramadol via intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). Patients were assessed at 1, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after TAP block for hemodynamic parameters, verbal numerical rating pain scores (VNRS) (pain at rest and coughing), total amount of IV-PCA tramadol demand and consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, total amount of rescue analgesic demands, sedation, nausea, vomitting and satisfaction by a blinded investigator. The VRNS scores both at rest and coughing were found significantly lower in TAP block group with levobupivacaine compared to control group at all check points. Total amount of IV-PCA tramadol demand and consumption, number of rescue analgesic demands and consumption were significantly lower in TAP block group. Time to first rescue analgesia was longer in TAP group. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in TAP group. In our study USG-TAP block provided effective postoperative analgesia and we consider this technique as a safe and effective method for postoperative pain control after caesarean delivery

Özet

Bu çalışmada, sezaryende ultrason (US) eşliğinde yapılan Transversus Abdominis Plan (TAP) bloğun postoperatif analjezik tüketimine ve analjezinin kalitesine etkisinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmaya, spinal aneztezi altında elektif sezaryen operasyonu planlanan ASA I-II 70 olgu alındı. Olgular rasgele 2 gruba ayrıldı: Grup T (TAP blok grubu) (n:35) ve Grup K (Kontrol grubu) (n:35). Cerrahinin bitiminde Grup T'ye TAP blok, bilateral olarak, tek tarafa 20 ml olacak şekilde % 0,25'lik levobupivakain enjeksiyonu ile yapıldı. Tüm olgulara, Hasta Kontrollü Analjezi (HKA) cihazı yardımıyla, postoperatif 24 saat i.v. tramadol ile analjezi uygulandı. Olgular postoperatif 1, 4, 6, 12, 18 ve 24. saatlerde hemodinamik parametreler, Numerical Rating Scala (NRS) (istirahatte ve öksürükle ağrı skoru), sedasyon skoru, saatlik ve total tramadol miktarı, HKA istek/alım sayıları, ek analjezik gereksinimi, ilk analjezik ihtiyaç zamanı, bulantı-kusma ve yan etkiler açısından takip edilerek kaydedildi. Postoperatif 24. saatte hasta memnuniyeti sorgulandı.Grup T'de Grup K'ya göre istirahat halinde (NRSi) ve öksürme ile ağrı skorları (NRSö) postoperatif tüm takiplerde (1, 4, 6, 12, 18 ve 24. saatlerde) anlamlı olarak düşüktü (p<0.05). Olguların postoperatif HKA cihazı ile analjezik talep sayıları, tramadol tüketimleri, ek analjezik ihtiyacı olan hasta sayısı ve uygulanan ek analjezik miktarı Grup T'de Grup K'ya göre anlamlı derecede düşük bulundu (p<0.05). İlk analjezik ihtiyaç zamanı Grup T'de Grup K'ya göre uzamıştı (p<0.05). Hasta memnuniyeti, Grup T'de Grup K'ya göre anlamlı derecede yüksekti (p<0.05). Postoperatif analjezi amacıyla güvenilir ve etkin bir analjezik teknik olduğunu düşündüğümüz TAP bloğun sezaryen sonrası analjezide tercih edilebileceği kanaatindeyiz

🔖

Cite This Article

CANSIZ, K. H., YEDEKÇI, A. E., ŞEN, H., ÖZKAN, S., DAĞLI, G. (2015). Sezaryende Ultrason Eşliğinde Yapılan Transversus Abdominis Plan Bloğun Postoperatif Analjezik Tüketimine Etkisi. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 2, 121–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/199794

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Erdine, S., Ağrının tanımı. Ağrı sendromları ve tedavisi, 2. baskı, Gizben Matbaacılık, 1-2, 2003.
  2. Şahin S., Owen D.O., Ağrısız Doğum ve Sezaryende Anestezi, Nobel ve Güneş Tıp Kitabevi, 125-132, 2006.
  3. Wall, P.D., Melzack, R., Pain measurements in per- sons in pain. In: Wall, P.D., Melzack, R., eds. Textbook of pain. 4th ed. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone, 409-426, 2003.
  4. El-Dawlatly, A.A., Thallaj. A., Aldohayan, A., Alzoman, A., Unilateral US guided TAP block for abdominal sur- gery, The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology, 15(2), 2008.
  5. Siddik S.M., Aouad M.T., Jalbout M.I., Rizk L.B., Kamar G.H., Baraka A.S., Diclofenac and/or propacetamol for postoperative pain management after cesarean deli- very in patients receiving patient controlled analgesia morphine, Reg Anesth Pain Med, 26, 310-5, 2001.
  6. Kuppuvelumani, P., Jaradi, H., Delilkan, A., Abdominal nerve blockade for postoperative analgesia after cae- sarean section, Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol, 19, 165-169, 1993.
  7. Dierking, G.W., Dahl, J.B., Kanstrup, J. et al, Effect of pre-vs- postoperative inguinal field block on postopera- tive pain after herniorrhaphy, Br J Anaesth, 68(4), 344- 8, 1992.
  8. Young, J.M., Gorlin, A.W., Modest, V.E., Quraishi, S.A., Clinical Implications of the Transversus Abdominis Pla- ne Block in Adults, Anesthesiology Research and Prac- tice, 1-11, 2012
  9. Netter, F.H. Back and spinal cord. In: Netter, F.H., ed. Atlas of human anatomy. Summit, New Jersey, USA, 145-155, 1989.
  10. Krivak, T.C., Zorn, K.K., Venous thromboembolism in obstetrics and gynecology, Obstet Gynecol, 109(3): 761-77, 2007.
  11. Buvanendran A., Kroin J.S., Multimodal analgesia for controlling acute postoperative pain, Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 22, 588-593, 2009.
  12. Wittels, B., Scott, D.T., Sinatra, R.S., Exogenous opio- ids in human breast milk and acute neonatal neurobe- havior: a preliminary study, Anesthesiology, 73:864-9, 1990.
  13. Bonnet, F., Marret, E. Influence of anaesthetic and anal- gesic techniques on outcome after surgery, Br J Ana- esth, 95, 52-8, 2005.
  14. Rafi, A.N., Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle, Anaesthesia, 56, 1024-1026, 2001.
  15. Hebbard, P., Fujiwara, Y., Shibata, Y., Royse, C., Ult- rasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, Anaesth Intensive Care, 35, 616-617, 2007.
  16. Abdallah, F.W., Chan, V.W., Brull, R. Transversus abdominis plane block a systematic review, Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 37, 193-209, 2012.
  17. Baaj, J.M., Alsatli, R.A., Majaj, H.A., B