Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2017 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1

Clinical and Cytogenetic Evaluations of Patients with Turner Syndrome: Are We Aware Enough?

Pages
12–15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, patients should be evaluated by chromosome analysis in case there is clinical suspicion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The objective of the present study was to describe the phenotypic features of Turner syndrome (TS) and to investigate the relationship between the genotype and the phenotype.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We studied 26 female patients who were enrolled between 2006 and 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, patients should be evaluated by chromosome analysis in case there is clinical suspicion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the present study was to describe the phenotypic features of Turner syndrome (TS) and to investigate the relationship between the genotype and the phenotype. Materials and Methods: We studied 26 female patients who were enrolled between 2006 and 2015. Physical features, clinical history, laboratory findings, and imaging test results were recorded. Chromosomal analysis was performed on peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures of the patients.Results: The mean age of the study population was 10.4±5.6 years (range, 1 day to 17 years). Three patients were diagnosed in the neonatal period. Although the most common phenotypic feature was short stature (92.3%), the characteristic stigmatas were usually seen in the 45, X karyotype. Among the 26 patients, monosomy 45, X was detected in 7 (26.9%) of them. Eleven percent of our patients had 46,X,i(X) (isochromosome Xq), while the rest demonstrated mosaic karyotypes [45,X/46,XY (19.2%); 45,X/46,XX (11.5%); 45,X/46,X,i(X) (11.5%); 45,X/46,XX,r(X) (7.7%); 45,X/46,X,i(Y) (3.8%); 45,X/47,XXX (3.8%); and 45,X/46,XX del(Xp) (3.8%)]. Conclusion: TS is one of the most common sex chromosome abnormalities, but it is frequently underdiagnosed. The frequency of the monosomy 45, X karyotype in TS is less than previously thought. Therefore, patients should be evaluated by chromosome analysis in case there is clinical suspicion.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRSOY, S., AKSEL, Ö. K., BOZKAYA, Ö. G., BORA, E., ÜNAL, N., ERÇAL, M. D. (2017). Clinical and Cytogenetic Evaluations of Patients with Turner Syndrome: Are We Aware Enough?. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 1, 12–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/199721

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Nielson J, Wohlet M. Chromosome abnormalities found among 34910 newborn children: results from a 13 year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark. Hum Genet 1991; 87: 81-3. [CrossRef] Homer L, Le Martelot MT, Morel F, Amice V, Kerlan V, Collet M, et al. 45,X/46,XX mosaicism below 30% of aneuploidy: clinical implica- tions in adult women from a reproductive medicine unit. Eur J Endo- crinol 2010; 162: 617-23. [CrossRef] Hook EB, Warburton D. The distribution of chromosomal genotypes associated with Turner's syndrome: livebirth prevalence rates and evi- dence for diminished fetal mortality and severity in genotypes associ- ated with structural X abnormalities or mosaicism. Hum Genet 1983; 64: 24-7. [CrossRef] Held KR, Kerber S, Kaminsky E, Singh S, Goetz P, Seemanova E, et al. Mosaicism in 45,X Turner syndrome: does survival in early preg- nancy depend on the presence of two sex chromosomes? Hum Genet 1992; 88(3): 288-94. [CrossRef] Davenport ML. Approach to the patient with Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95(4): 1487-95. [CrossRef] Oliveira RM, Verreschi IT, Lipay MV, Eça LP, Guedes AD, Bianco B, et al. Y chromosome in Turner syndrome: review of the literature. Sao Paulo Med J 2009; 127(6): 373-8. [CrossRef] McGowan-Jordan J, Simons A, Schmid M. ISCN: an internation- al system for human cytogenomic nomenclature. Basel: New York, Karger; 2016. [CrossRef] Wolff DJ, Van Dyke DL, Powell CM. Laboratory guideline for Turner syndrome. Genet Med 2010; 12(1): 52-5. [CrossRef] Al Alwan I, Khadora M, Amir I, Nasrat G, Omair A, Brown L, et al. Turner Syndrome Genotype and phenotype and their effect on pre- senting features and timing of Diagnosis. Int J Health Sci 2014; 8(2): 195-202. [CrossRef] Zhong Q, Layman LC. Genetic considerations in the patient with Turner syndrome--45,X with or without mosaicism. Fertil Steril 2012; 98(4): 775-9. [CrossRef] Cools M, Drop SL, Wolffenbuttel KP, Oosterhuis JW, Looijenga LH. Germ cell tumors in the intersex gonad: old paths, new directions, moving frontiers. Endocr Rev 2006; 27: 468-84. [CrossRef] Gantt PA, Byrd JR, Greenblatt RB, McDonough PG. A clinical and cytogenetic study of fifteen patients with 45,X/46XY Gonadal Dys- genesis. Fertil Steril 1980; 34: 216-21. [CrossRef] Kuntsi J, Skuse D, Elgar K, Morris E, Turner C. Ring-X chromosomes: Their cognitive and behavioural phenotype. Ann Hum Genet 2006; 64: 295-305. [CrossRef] Elsheikh M, Dunger DB, Conway GS, Wass JA. Turner's syndrome in adulthood. Endocr Rev 2002; 23(1