Journals / KBB-Forum / 2011 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4

Kronik otitis media-karşı kulağın değerlendirilmesi

Chronic otitis media-evaluation of the contralateral ear

Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
50–56
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although some limitations exists, the results indicate that both ears will be regarded as pairs and disease in one ear, especially cholesteatoma, will be indicative for close follow up of contralateral ear.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the contralateral ear changes (CLE's) in chronic otitis media (COM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was undertaken the dates between 2003 and 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although some limitations exists, the results indicate that both ears will be regarded as pairs and disease in one ear, especially cholesteatoma, will be indicative for close follow up of contralateral ear.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the contralateral ear changes (CLE's) in chronic otitis media (COM). Material and Methods: A retrospective medical chart review of subjects which were diagnosed and surgically treated for COM. This study was undertaken the dates between 2003 and 2009. All subjects were evaluated for the presence of CLE changes. In addition, according to the pathologic examination subjects were also divided either chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma (CCOM-group A) or chronic otitis media without cholesteatoma (NCCOM-group B). Otomicroscopic and Computerized Tomography (CT) findings of CLE for each group were noted and compared. Results: Stage 1-2 and Stage 3-4 pars tensa retraction, Stage 1-2 and Stage 3-4 pars flaccida retraction and presence of cholesteatoma were found statistically significant high in the group A (p=0.005, p=0.129 p=0.004, p=0.001, p=0.029 respectively). In contrast perforation of the CLE ear was statistically significant high in group B (p=0.001). When compared the CT findings, soft tissue in the tympanic cavity, soft tissue in the mastoid cavity, ossicular chain defect, scutum erosion were found statistically significant high in the group A (p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.001 respectively). Poor mastoid pneumatization did not differ between the groups (p=0.642) but normal CLE findings were found statistically significant high in the group B (p=0.012). Conclusion: Although some limitations exists, the results indicate that both ears will be regarded as pairs and disease in one ear, especially cholesteatoma, will be indicative for close follow up of contralateral ear.

Özet

Amaç: Kronik otitis media'da karşı kulağın durumunu değerlendirmek Yöntem: Kronik otitis media tanısı alan ve cerrahi olarak tedavi edilen olguların medikal kayıtları geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Çalışma 2003 ile 2009 yılları arasını kapsamaktaydı. Tüm olgular opere edilmeyen kulaktaki değişikliklerin varlığı açısından değerlendirildi. Ek olarak, patolojik inceleme sonucuna göre olgular kolesteatomlu kronik otitis media (Grup A) ve kolesteatomsuz otitis media (Grup B) olarak gruplarına ayrıldı. Otomikroskopik ve bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) bulguları her grup için kaydedildi ve karşılaştırıldı. Sonuçlar: Evre 1-2, evre 3-4 pars tensa retraksiyonu, evre 1-2, evre 3-4 pars flaccida retraksiyonu grup A‘ da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bulundu (p=0.005, p=0.129 p=0.004, p=0.001, p=0.029). Zıt olarak diğer kulakta perforasyon ise grup B' de anlamlı derecede yüksek bulundu (p=0.001). BT bulguları değerlendirildiğinde timpanik kavitede yumuşak doku, mastoid kavitede yumuşak doku, kemikçik zincir defekti, skutum erezyonu grup A' da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bulundu (p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.001 ). Kötü mastoid pnömatizasyonu açısından gruplar arasında farklılık yoktu (p=0.642). Normal karşı kulak bulguları grup B‘ de anlamlı derecede yüksekti (p=0.012). Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın bazı kısıtlılıkları olsa da çalışma sonuçları her iki kulağın bir çift olarak değerlendirilmesini ve bir kulaktaki hastalığın, özellikle kolesteatomun, diğer kulağın daha yakın takibi için bir gösterge olabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYHAN, F. T., SAYIN, İ., ÇAKABAY, T., YAZICI, Z. M., KAYA, K. H. (2011). Kronik otitis media-karşı kulağın değerlendirilmesi. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 4, 50–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/199406

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. N Shah. Otitis media and its sequelae. Journal of the Royal Society of medicine. 1991
  2. 586 2. Gates GA, Klein JO, Lim DJ, Mogi G, Ogra PL, Pararella MM, Paradise JL, Tos M. Recent advances in otitis media. 1. Definitions, terminology, and classification of otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2002 Mar
  3. Review. 3. Selaimen da Costa S, Rosito LP, Dornelles C, Sperling N. The contralateral ear in chronic otitis media: a series of 500 subjects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Mar
  4. 134(3):290-3. 4. Sudhoff H, Tos M. Pathogenesis of sinus cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Oct
  5. 264(10):1137-43. Epub 2007 May 30. 5. Vartiainen E, Kansanen M, Vartiainen J. The contralateral ear in subjects with chronic otitis media. Am J Otol. 1996 Mar
  6. 17(2):190-2. 6. Rosito LP, da Costa SS, Schachern PA, Dornelles C, Cureoglu S, Paparella MM. Contralateral ear in chronic otitis media: a histologic study. Laryngoscope. 2007 Oct
  7. 117(10):1809-14. 7. Sadé J, Ar A. Middle ear and auditory tube: middle ear clearance, gas exchange, and pressure regulation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Apr
  8. 116(4):499- 524. Review. 8. Tos M, Poulsen G. Attic retractions following secretory otitis. Acta Otolaryngol. 1980 May-Jun
  9. 89(5-6):479-86. 9. Sadé J, Berco E. Atelectasis and secretory otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1976 Mar-Apr
  10. 85(2 Suppl 25 Pt 2):66-72.