SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Sayı: 21

Does the Ceo Turnover Rate Change According to Firm Success and Stock Exchange Listing ? A Research on ISO 500 Firms

ŞİRKET BAŞARISI VE BORSADA İŞLEM GÖRMESİNE GÖRE TEPE YÖNETİCİSİ DEĞİŞİM ORANI FARKLILAĞIR MI ? İSO 500 ŞİRKETLERİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

ÖZGÜR ATILGAN
Pages
207–224
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicate that, CEO change ratio of ISO 500 firms which are in the first quarter of ISO 500 list is higher than the CEO change ratio of ISO 500 firms which are in the last quarter of ISO 500 list.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between CEO change ratio, enrollment in stock Exchange and firm success in İSO 500 list..
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results indicate that, CEO change ratio of ISO 500 firms which are in the first quarter of ISO 500 list is higher than the CEO change ratio of ISO 500 firms which are in the last quarter of ISO 500 list.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides that, the CEO change ratio of ISO 500 firms which are also in BİST (İstanbul Stock Exchange) is higher than CEO change ratio of ISO 500 firms which are not in BİST.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between CEO change ratio, enrollment in stock Exchange and firm success in İSO 500 list.. Results indicate that, CEO change ratio of ISO 500 firms which are in the first quarter of ISO 500 list is higher than the CEO change ratio of ISO 500 firms which are in the last quarter of ISO 500 list. Besides that, the CEO change ratio of ISO 500 firms which are also in BİST (İstanbul Stock Exchange) is higher than CEO change ratio of ISO 500 firms which are not in BİST.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’ de İSO 500 şirketlerinde tepe yöneticisi değişimi, şirketlerin borsada işlem görmesi ve şirket başarısı arasındaki ilişkiyi tespit etmektir. Çalışmada 210 İSO 500 şirketinin 2007-2017 döneminde (10 yıl boyunca) tepe yöneticisi değiştirme oranı tespit edilmiş ve bu ortalama ile İSO 500 başarı sırası arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar, ilk çeyrekte yer alan İSO 500 şirketlerinin tepe yöneticisi değiştirme oranının, İSO 500 listesinde son çeyrekte yer alan şirketlere göre daha fazla olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, İSO 500 listesinde bulunan borsa şirketlerinin tepe yöneticisi değiştirme oranının İSO 500 listesinde bulunan ancak borsada yer almayan şirketlere göre daha fazla olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATILGAN, Ö. (2018). Does the Ceo Turnover Rate Change According to Firm Success and Stock Exchange Listing ? A Research on ISO 500 Firms. Kafkas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 21, 207–224. https://ajindex.com/articles/199316

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Berle, A. & Means, G. (1932). The modern corporate and private property. New York: McMillan Borokhovic, K. A., Parrino, R. & Trapani, T. (1996). Outside directors and CEO selection. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, (3), 337-355.
  2. Boyne, A., James, O., John, P. & Petrovsky, N. (2011). Top management turnover and organizational performance: A Test of Contingency Model. Public Administration Review, 71 (4), 572-581.
  3. Carpenter, M. A. (2002). The ımplications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Stategic Management Journal, 23(3), 278-284.
  4. Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K. & Sarin, A. (1997). Ownership structure and top executive turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(2), 193-221.
  5. Doğan, M. & Ağca, V. (2013). The Effect of degree of CEO turnover on firm performance in high-tech vs. low-tech firms: Evidence from Turkey. International Conference Economic and Social Studies, (1), 1-9.
  6. Durukan, B., Özkan, S. & Dalkılıç, F. (2012). CEO turnover and corporate performance relationship in pre-and post- IFRS Period: evidence from Turkey. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(3), 421-442.
  7. Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W. & Amason, A.C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(4), 365-386.
  8. Fry, F. L., Stoner, C. R. & Hattwick, R.E. (2009). Business: An ıntegrative approach. New York: McGraw-Hill. Gökmen, A. (2010). Yönetici değişiminin işletme performansına etkisi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, (2), 11-17.
  9. Helmich, D. & Brown, W. B. (1972). Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 371-381.
  10. Huson, M. R., Malatesta, P. H. & Parriono, R. (2004) Managerial succession and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(2), 237-275.
  11. Jenter, D. & Kanaan, F. (2015). CEO turnover and relative performance evaluation. The Journal of Finance, 70(5), 2155-2184.
  12. Jenter, D. & Lewellen, K. A. (2017). Performance-induced CEO turnover. CEPR Discussion Paper, No: DP12274, 1-44. Kaplan S. N. & Minton, B. A. (2012). How has CEO turnover changed ? International Review of Finance, 12(1), 57-87.
  13. Kato, T. & Long, C. (2006). CEO turnover, firm performance and enterprise reform in China: Evidence from New Micro Data. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(4), 796-817.
  14. Khandawalla, P.N. (2004). Compete