Journals / JAREM / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Bladder Stones as an Etiological Factor that Must Be Kept in Mind Due to Their Increased Incidence in Female Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Complaints

Alt Üriner Sistem Şikayetleri Olan Kadın Hastalarda Artan Sıklığı ile Akılda Tutulması Gereken Etiyolojik Faktör Olarak Mesane Taşları

Journal
JAREM
Pages
7–10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, despite the safe and successful use of endoscopic surgical procedures, this topic needs to be supported and developed with new studies

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Bladder stones make up 5% of urinary tract stone diseases, and 5% of all bladder stones are seen in women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we retrospectively examined data from female patients who were operated after being diagnosed with bladder stones in our clinic.Methods: Data from 92 females who were operated after being diagnosed with bladder stones at our clinic between January 2006 and October 2014 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, despite the safe and successful use of endoscopic surgical procedures, this topic needs to be supported and developed with new studies
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Bladder stones make up 5% of urinary tract stone diseases, and 5% of all bladder stones are seen in women. All kinds of pathologies, chronic urinary tract infections, and foreign bodies causing urinary flow to be dysfunctional are regarded as predisposing factors in general. Well-defined endoscopic, laparoscopic, and open surgical procedures can be performed for treatment. In this study, we retrospectively examined data from female patients who were operated after being diagnosed with bladder stones in our clinic.Methods: Data from 92 females who were operated after being diagnosed with bladder stones at our clinic between January 2006 and October 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients’ demographic information, complaints on admission, etiological factors in stone formation, and pre-/post-operative data were retrospectively analyzed.Results: The ages of the patients ranged between 17 and 85 years (mean, 46.8 years). When the backgrounds of the patients were studied, a history of the following was found: gynecological procedures in 49 patients [12 patients with transobturator tape (TOT), trans-vaginal tape in 10 (TVT), trans-abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in 9 (TAH-BSO), cystocele repair in 7, cesarean section in 8 (C/S), intrauterine device migration in 3, and neurogenic bladder dysfunction in 9]. The average stone size was 25.4 mm (range, 7-50 mm). Except for 9 patients with an excess load of stones or in whom the stones could not be previously removed using endoscopic methods, all patients were endoscopically treated.Conclusion: Together with a more frequent application of urogynecological procedures, bladder stones in females have become an important fact in clinical practice that should not be ignored. Therefore, despite the safe and successful use of endoscopic surgical procedures, this topic needs to be supported and developed with new studies

Özet

Amaç: Mesane taşları üriner sistem taş hastalıklarının %5'ini oluşturmakta ve tüm mesane taşlarının %5'i kadınlarda görülmektedir. Üriner akımın bozulmasına sebep olan her türlü patoloji, kronik üriner sistem enfeksiyonları ve yabancı cisimler genel olarak predispozan faktörler olarak sıralanır. Tedavide iyi tanımlanmış endoskopik, laparoskopik ve açık cerrahi yöntemler kullanılabilir. Biz de bu çalışmamızda kliniğimizde mesane taşı tanısı ile opere olan kadın hastaların verilerini retrospektif olarak inceledik.Yöntemler: Ocak 2006 - Ekim 2014 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde mesane taşı tanısıyla opere edilen 92 kadın hastanın verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların demografik bilgileri, başvuru şikayetleri, taş oluşumundaki etiyolojik faktörleri, pre/post operatif operasyon bilgileri retrospektif olarak incelendi.Bulgular: Hastaların yaşları 17 ve 85 yıl (ortalama 46,8) arasında değişmekteydi. Hastaların özgeçmişleri incelendiğinde 49 hastada jinekolojik girişim öyküsü [12 vaka trans obturatuar tape (TOT), 10 vakada trans vajinal tape (TVT), 9 vakada trans abdominal histerektomi ve bilateral salpingooferektomi (TAH-BSO), 7 vakada sistosel onarımı, 8 vakada sezaryan öyküsü (C/S) ve 3 vakada rahim içi araç migrasyonu] ve 9 hastada nörojenik mesane disfonksiyonu saptandı. Ortalama taş boyutu 25,4 mm (7-50 mm) olarak saptandı. Taş yükü fazlalığı ya da daha öncesinde endoskopik yöntemler ile taşın çıkarılamadığı 9 hasta hariç tüm hastalar endoskopik olarak tedavi edildi.Sonuç: Ürojinekolojik uygulamaların daha sık uygulanmasıyla birlikte kadın mesane taşları klinik pratiğimizin göz ardı edilmemesi gereken önemli bir olgusu haline gelmiş bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle ön planda endoskopik cerrahiler güvenli ve başarılı bir şekilde kullanılmasına karşın bu konunun yeni çalışmalarla desteklenmesi ve geliştirilmesine ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

YENİCE, M. G., ŞAHİN, S., EKŞİ, M., ATAR, F. A., ŞEKER, K. G., TUĞCU, V. (2017). Bladder Stones as an Etiological Factor that Must Be Kept in Mind Due to Their Increased Incidence in Female Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Complaints. JAREM, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 7–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/199214

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Schwartz BF, Stoller ML. The vesical calculus. Urol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 333-46
  2. Drach GW. Urinary lithiasis: etiology, diagnosis, and medical management. In: Walsh PC, Retick AB, Stamey TA, eds. CampbellâsUrology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1992: 2085-156
  3. Ali SH, Rifat UN. Etiological and geographical study on urolithiasis in Iraq. Pediatr Nephrol 2005; 20: 1453-7
  4. Yoshida O. A chronological and geographical study on urolithiasis in Japan. Jpn J Endourol ESWL 1990; 3: 5
  5. Wai CY, Margulis V, Baugh BR, Schaffer JI. Multiple vesical calculi and complete vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 884-5
  6. Ord J, Lunn D, Reynard J. Bladder management and risk of bladder Stone formation in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol 2003; 170: 1734-7
  7. DeVivo MJ, Fine PR, Cutter GR, Maetz HM. The risk of bladder calculi in patients with spinal cord injuries. Arch Intern Med 1985; 145: 428-30
  8. Otnes B. Correlation between causes and composition of urinary stones. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1983; 17: 93-8
  9. Grenabo L, Hedelin H, Petterson S. Adherence of urease-induced crystal storat bladder epithelium. Urol Res 1988; 16: 49
  10. Peyromaure M, Dayma T, Zerbib M. Development of a bladder Stone following a tension-free vaginal tape intervention. J Urol 2004; 171: 337
  11. Mosher WD, Pratt WF. Contraceptive use in the United States, 1973- 88. Patient Edu Couns 1990;16: 163-72
  12. Markovitch O, Klein Z, Gidoni Y, Holzinger M, Beyth Y. Extrauterine mislocated IUD: is surgical removal mandatory? Contraception 2002; 66: 105-8
  13. Kassab B, Audra P. The migrating intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature. Contracept FertilSex 1999; 27: 696-700
  14. Michaud DS1. Chronic inflammation and bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2007; 25: 260-8
  15. Stav K1, Dwyer PL. Urinary bladder stones in women. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2012; 67: 715-25
  16. Granados EA, Riley G, Rios GJ, Salvador J, Vicente J. Self introduction of urethro vesical foreign bodies. Eur Urol 1991; 19: 259-61
  17. Ho K, Segura J. Lower urinary tract calculi. In: Wein A, Kavoussi L, Novick A, eds. Campbell-WalshUrology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2007: 2663-73
  18. Torricelli FC, Mazzucchi E, Danilovic A, Coelho RF, Srougi M. Surgical management of bladder stones: literatüre review. Rev Col Bras Cir 2013; 40: 227-33
  19. Un-no T, Nagata M, Takayama T, Mugiya S, Suzuki K, Fujita K. Cystolithotripsy for bladder stones: comparison of holmium: YAG laser