SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Glokom Katarakt / 2016 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations in Eyes in Which Two Commonly Used Hydrophobic Spherical Intraocular Lenses are Implanted

Sık Kullanılan İki Hidrofobik Sferik Göz İçi Lensin Katarakt Cerrahisi Sonrası Oluşan Yüksek Sıralı Aberasyonlar Açısından Karşılaştırılması

Faruk KAYA
İbrahim KOÇAK
Ali AYDIN
Hakan BAYBORA
Mustafa ELİAÇIK
Pages
19–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: There was not statistically significant difference between two groups for all aberrometry parameters (p>0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare two hydrophobic spherical acrylic lenses in terms of their effects on higher order aberrations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this prospective and randomized study 48 eyes of 38 patients who underwent cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and hydrophobic acrylic IOL implantation were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: There was not statistically significant difference between two groups for all aberrometry parameters (p>0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To compare two hydrophobic spherical acrylic lenses in terms of their effects on higher order aberrations. Materials and Methods: In this prospective and randomized study 48 eyes of 38 patients who underwent cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and hydrophobic acrylic IOL implantation were included. Two hydrophobic spherical IOL groups were made up. In group 1, Focus force F260, Zaraccom (Anadolu Tıp Teknolojileri, Sivas, Turkey) lenses were implanted in 24 eyes. In group 2, Acrysof SA 60 (Alcon Lab. Inc.,FtWorth, Tex, USA) were used in 24 eyes. Aberrometry was performed on postoperative 90 thday and two groups were compared for higher order aberrations. Results: Postoperative total RMS value was 3.18±2.48 for Zaraccom group. The other values were 0.17±0.19 for higher order RMS, 0.04±0.06 for coma, -0.004±0.07 for spherical aberration, and 0,08±0,09 for trefoil. The results for Acrysof SA 60 group were 1.44±1.40; 0.24±0.1; 0.13±0.08; 0.05±0.06; 0.14±0.08 for total RMS value, higher order RMS value, coma, spherical aberration and trefoil respectively. Conclusion: There was not statistically significant difference between two groups for all aberrometry parameters (p>0.05).

Özet

Amaç: Ülkemizde sık kullanılan iki hidrofobik sferik lensi, katarakt cerrahisi sonrası oluşan yüksek sıralı aberasyonlar açısından karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Prospektif ve randomize çalışmamıza, fakoemülsifikasyonla katarakt ameliyatı olup göz içine hidrofobik akrilik lens implantasyonu gerçekleştirilen 38 hastanın 48 gözü dahil edildi. Göz içine farklı hidrofobik sferik lens konan (Focus force F260, Zaraccom veya Acrysof SA 60, Alcon) gözlerden iki grup oluşturuldu. Cerrahi sonrası 90. günde VisxWavescan (Abbott, USA) cihazıyla skotopik şartlarda aberasyonlar ölçüldü ve iki grup arasında anlamlı fark olup olmadığı değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Zaraccom lensi implante edilen grupta cerrahi sonrası değerlendirilen aberasyonlarda toplam RMS (root mean square) değeri 3.18±2.48, yüksek sıralı RMS değeri 0.17±0.19, coma 0.04±0.06, sferik aberasyon -0.004±0.07, trefoil 0.08±0.09 iken; Acrysof lensi implante edilen grupta cerrahi sonrası toplam RMS değeri 1.44±1.40, yüksek sıralı RMS değeri 0.24±0.1, coma 0.13±0.08, sferik aberasyon 0.05±0.06, trefoil 0.14±0.08 olarak bulundu. İki grup karşılaştırıldığında (p=0.05) istatistiksel olarak anlamlı aberasyon farkı bulunmadı (p>0.05). Sonuç: Katarakt cerrahisi sonrası değerlendirilen aberasyonlarda (toplam RMS, yüksek sıralı RMS, sferik aberasyon, coma, trefoil) iki lens arasında istatistiksel anlamlı fark bulunmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, F., KOÇAK, İ., AYDIN, A., BAYBORA, H., ELİAÇIK, M. (2016). Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations in Eyes in Which Two Commonly Used Hydrophobic Spherical Intraocular Lenses are Implanted. Glokom Katarakt, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 19–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/199140

References (11)

  1. Denoyer A, Halfon J, Majzoub S et al. Visual function after cataract surgery in patients with an aspherical lens without spherical aberration. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007;30:578-84.
  2. Tzelikis PF, Akaishi L, Trindade FC et al. Ocular aberrations and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with AcrySof IQ intraocular lens implantation Clinical comparative study.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1918-24.
  3. Tzelikis PF, Akaishi L, Trindade FC et al. Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a comparative study. Am J Oph- thalmol. 2008;145:827-33.
  4. Fang L, Wang Y, He X. Evaluation of optical quality in white light from wavefront aberrations for a myopic population of human eyes. Clin Exp Optom. 2009;92:313-9.
  5. Kocak I, F. Kaya, H. Baybora. Higher order aberrations in eyes implanted with aspheric vs spherical hydrophilic intrao- cular lenses. Int Eye Sci 2012;12:381-3.
  6. Mathur A, Atchison DA, Charman WN. Effects of age on pe- ripheral ocular aberrations. Opt Express 2010;18:5840-53. Cermáková S, Skorkovská S. Corneal higher order aber- rations and their changes with aging Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2010;66:254-7.
  7. Berrio E, Tabernero J, Artal P. Optical aberrations and align- ment of the eye with age. J Vis. 2010;10:34. Barbero S, Marcos S, Jiménez-Alfaro I. Optical aberrations of intraocular lenses measured in vivo and in vitro. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003;20:1841-51.
  8. Jason Porter, Antonio Guirao, Ian G. Cox et al. Monochroma- tic aberrations of the human eye in a large population. J Opt Soc Am A opt image Sci Vis 2001;18:1793-803 Wang L1, Koch DD. Ocular higher-order aberrations in indivi- duals screened for refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1896-903.
  9. Awwad ST, Lehmann JD, McCulley JP et al. A comparison of higher order aberrations in eyes implanted with AcrySof IQ SN60WF and AcrySof SN60AT intraocular lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17:320-6.
  10. Sandoval HP, Fernández de Castro LE, Vroman DT et al. Comparison of visual outcomes, photopic contrast sensitivity, wavefront analysis, and patient satisfaction following cataract extraction and IOL implantation: aspheric vs spherical acrylic lenses. Eye (Lond). 2008;22:1469-75.
  11. Rekas M, Krix-Jachym K, Zelichowska B. Comparison of hig- her order aberrations with spherical and aspheric IOLs com- pared to normal phakic eyes. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008;18:728- 32. Rocha KM, Soriano ES, Chalita MR et al. Wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity