SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Behaviour of Carbon/Epoxy Laminated Composites under Different Temperatures

Karbon Lifi/Epoksi Tabakalı Kompozit Malzemelerin Farklı Ortam Şartlarındaki Mod I Kırılma Davranışı

FATİH DARICIK
KERİMCAN ÇELEBİ
Pages
223–234
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For higher ambient temperatures than 23oC, it is concluded that glass transition temperature (Tg) of epoxy matrix is key parameter and the crack doesn’t propagate if the temperature is close to Tg.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Interlaminar fracture of a laminated composite material is the damage resistance of the material to cracks located at interface.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is found out that if the ambient temperature decreases under 0oC, Mod I interlaminar fracture toughness decreases also.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For higher ambient temperatures than 23oC, it is concluded that glass transition temperature (Tg) of epoxy matrix is key parameter and the crack doesn’t propagate if the temperature is close to Tg.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Interlaminar fracture of a laminated composite material is the damage resistance of the material to cracks located at interface. Mode I interlaminar fracture takes place and damages composites more easily than other modes since it is frictionless. In this study, the effect of ambient temperature to mod I interlaminar fracture toughness of carbon/epoxy laminate was studied. It is found out that if the ambient temperature decreases under 0oC, Mod I interlaminar fracture toughness decreases also. However fracture behavior doesn’t change and R-curve behaviors of laminates are similar under the 23oC and below. For higher ambient temperatures than 23oC, it is concluded that glass transition temperature (Tg) of epoxy matrix is key parameter and the crack doesn’t propagate if the temperature is close to Tg. Fracture characteristics of the laminate are so different under the temperatures higher than Tg

Özet

Tabakalar arası çatlak ve kırılma, tabakalı kompozit malzemelerde çokça karşılaşılan bir hasar türüdür. Ayrılma modu tabakalar arası kırılmanın en kolay gerçekleştiği ve tabakalar arası kırılma tokluğunun en düşük olduğu kırılma modudur. Bu çalışmada 140oC ile -160oC aralığındaki ortam sıcaklıklarının karbon lifi/epoksi kompozit malzemenin Mod I tabakalar arası kırılma tokluğuna ve kırılma mekaniğine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgularda ortam sıcaklığı 0oC'nin altına düştüğünde tabakalar arası kırılma tokluğu, 23oC ortam sıcaklığındaki kırılma tokluğuna göre azalmıştır. Ancak düşük ortam sıcaklıklarındaki kırılma karakteristiği 23oC sıcaklıktaki kırılma karakteristiğine benzerdir. Yüksek ortam sıcaklıklarında ise matris malzemenin camsı geçiş sıcaklığı çatlak gelişimi için doğal bir limit oluşturmaktadır. Epoksi matrisin camsı geçiş sıcaklığına yakın sıcaklıklarda çatlak ilerlememiştir. Camsı geçiş sıcaklığının üzerindeki sıcaklıklarda ise malzemenin kırılma davranışı tamamen değişmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

DARICIK, F., ÇELEBİ, K. (2017). Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Behaviour of Carbon/Epoxy Laminated Composites under Different Temperatures. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 223–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/199061

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Argüelles, A., Vina, J., Canteli, A. F., Castrillo, M. A., Bonhomme, J., 2008. Interlaminar Crack Initiation and Growth Rate in a CarbonFibre Epoxy Composite under Mode-I Fatigue Loading. Composites Science and Technology, 68, 2325-2331
  2. Brunner, A. J., Murphy, N., Pinter, G., 2009. Development of a Standardized Procedure for the Characterization of Interlaminar Delamination Propagation in Advanced Composites under Fatigue Mode I Loading Conditions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics(76), 2678-2689
  3. O’Brien, T. K., 1998. Interlaminar Fracture Toughness: The Long and Winding Road to Standardization. Composites Part B, 29(1), 57-62
  4. Kenane, M., Azari, Z., Benmedakhene, S., Benzeggagh, M. L., 2011. Experimental Development of Fatigue Delamination Threshold Criterion. Composites Part B: Engineering, 42, 367-375
  5. Hojo, M., Kageyama, K., Tanaka, K., 1995. Prestandardization Study on Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness Test for CFRP in Japan. Composites, 26, 243-255
  6. Davies, P., Blackman, B. K., Brunner, A. J., 1998. Standard Test Methods for Delamination Resistance of Composite Materials: Current Status. Applied Composite Materials, (5), 345-364
  7. JIS Standard K 7086, Testing Methods for Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics, 1993
  8. ISO International Standard 15024, Fiberreinforced Plastic Composites - Determination of Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness, Gıc, Unidirectionally Reinforced Materials, 2001
  9. ASTM D5528-13, 2013. Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fractre Toughness of Unidirectional Continuous Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites
  10. Stelzer, S., Brunner, A. J., Argüelles, A., Murphy, N., Pinter, G., 2012. Mode I Delamination Fatigue Crack Growth in Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Composites: Development of a Standardized Test Procedure. Composites Science and Technology (72), 1102-1107. 11.Carlsson, L. A., Adams, D. F., Pipes, R. B., 2014. Experimental Characterization of Advanced Composite Materials. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 12. de Moura, M. S., Campilho, R. S., Amaro, A. M., Reis, P. B., 2010. Interlaminar and Intralaminar Fracture Characterization of Composites Under Mode I Loading. Composite Structures, 92, 144-149
  11. Shokrieh, M. M., Heidari-Rarani, M., 2011. Effect of Stacking Sequence on R-curve Behavior of Glass/Epoxy DCB Laminates with 0o//0o Crack Interface. Materials Science and Engineering A, 529, 265-269. 14.Chou, I., 1998. Effect of Fiber Orientation and Moisture