Journals / KBB-Forum / 2017 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

THE EFFECT OF THE RECONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TO THE HEARING LEVELS IN OSSICULOPLASTY: LONG TERM RESULTS

OSSİKÜLOPLASTİDE REKONSTRÜKSİYON MATERYALLERİNİN İŞİTMEYE ETKİSİ: UZUN DÖNEM SONUÇLAR

Journal
KBB-Forum
Pages
14–19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hydroxyapatite prosthesis can also be used safely in the patients, who don't have autologous grafts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of the study is to evaluate the auditory results and acquisitions of the patients, who had pre-operative conductive hearing loss and underwent ossiculoplasty, according to the used materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Thirty-five patients’ files that underwent ossiculoplasty during tympanoplasty or tympanomastoidectomy between the years of 2008 and 2014 were investigated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hydroxyapatite prosthesis can also be used safely in the patients, who don't have autologous grafts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study is to evaluate the auditory results and acquisitions of the patients, who had pre-operative conductive hearing loss and underwent ossiculoplasty, according to the used materials. Methods: Thirty-five patients’ files that underwent ossiculoplasty during tympanoplasty or tympanomastoidectomy between the years of 2008 and 2014 were investigated retrospectively. Demographic datas, pre-operative threshold of hearing, the material used in ossicular replacement, operation notes and post-operative audiometric investigations (at least 1 year later) were scanned. Twenty-eight of 35 patients, in whom incus and hydroxyapatite prosthesis are used for ossicular replacement, were included in the study. Results: The ages of the patients were between 11 and 60. Shaped incus was used in 17 patients (group 1) and hydroxyapatite prosthesis was used in 11 patients (group 2). Post-operative graft membranes were intact in all the patients. Post-operative air bone gap (ABG) increased in 4 patients, ABG decreased or got closed in 24 patients. There was no statistically significant difference of hearing acquisition between the groups. Conlusion: Incus can be preferred in ossicular replacement as it is cheap and easy to access. Hydroxyapatite prosthesis can also be used safely in the patients, who don't have autologous grafts.

Özet

Amaç: Operasyon öncesi iletim tipi işitme kaybı olup, kemikçik zincir rekonstrüksiyonu yapılan hastaların kullanılan materyallere gore işitme sonuçları ve kazançlarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntemler: 2008 ile 2014 tarihleri arasında timpanoplasti yada timpanomastoidektomi sırasında kemikçik zincir rekonstrüksiyonu uygulanan 35 hastanın dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastaların demografik verilerinin yan sıra opere edilen kulağın preoperatif işitme eşikleri, ossiküler replasmanda kullanılan materyal bilgileri, ameliyat notları ve postoperatif odyometrik incelemelerine (en erken 1 yıl sonrası) ulaşıldı. Ossiküler replasman için inkus ve hidroksiapatit protez kullanılan 28 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Bulgular: Hastaların yaşları 11 ila 60 arasında değişmekteydi. 17 hastada inkus şekillendirilerek yerine konmuş, 11 hastada ise hidroksiapatit protez kullanılmıştır. Hastaların tümünde postoperatif greft zar intakttır. 4 hastada postoperatif hava kemik aralığı daha da artmış, 24 hastada ise hava kemik aralığı azalmış ya da kapanmıştır. İnkus ve hidroksiapatit protez kullanılan hastalar arasından işitme kazancı açısından anlamlı fark saptanmamıştır. Sonuç: Ossiküler replasmanda inkus ucuz, erişilebilirliği kolay olmasından dolayı tercih edilebilir. Otolog greft olmayan hastalarda hidroksiapatit protezler de güvenle kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORUN, M. T., YALÇIN, Y., SEÇKİN, E. (2017). THE EFFECT OF THE RECONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TO THE HEARING LEVELS IN OSSICULOPLASTY: LONG TERM RESULTS. KBB-Forum, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 14–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/198674

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Stankovic MD. Audiologic results of surgery for cholesteatoma: short and long-term follow- up of influential factors. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29:933-40.
  2. Dornhoffer JL, Gardner E. Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty: a statistical staging system. Otol Neurotol. 2001;22(3):299-304. Smyth GD. Five-year report on partial ossicular replacement prostheses and total ossicular replacement prostheses. Otololaryngol Head Neck Surg 1982;90:343–346.
  3. Celenk F, Baglam T, Baysal E, Durucu C, Karatas ZA, Mumbuc S, et al. Management of incus long process defects: incus interposition versus incudostapedial rebridging with bone cement. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127(9):842-7.
  4. Shinohara T, Gyo K, Saiki T, Yanagihara N. Ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite prostheses: long-term results. Clin Otolaryngol. 2000;25:287-292. Grote JJ. Reconstruction of the middle ear with hydroxyapatite implants: long-term results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990;144(suppl):12-16.
  5. Ho SY, Battista RA, Wiet RJ. Early results with titanium ossicular implants. Otol Neurotol. 2003;24:149- 152.12621325 Baglam T, Karatas E, Durucu C, Kilic A, Ozer E, Mumbuc S, et al. Incudostapedial rebridging ossiculoplasty with bone cement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;141(2):243-6. Gérard JM, De Bie G, Franceschi D, Deggouj N, Gersdorff M. Ossiculoplasty with hydroxyapatite bone cement: our reconstruction philosophy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol.2015;272(7):1629-35.
  6. Goldenberg RA, Driver M. Long term results with hydroxyapatite middle ear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122:635-642.
  7. Gelfand YM, Chang CY. Ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium versus hydroxyapatite implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144(6):954-8
  8. Quaranta N, Taliente S, Coppola F, Salonna I. Cartilage ossiculoplasty in cholesteatoma surgery: hearing results and prognostic factors. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015;35(5):338-42. Quérat C, Martin C, Prades JM, Richard C. Canal wall up tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma with intact stapes. Comparison of hearing results between cartilage and PORP on stapes and impact of malleus removal and total reinforcement of the tympanic membrane by cartilage. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2014;131(4):211-6.
  9. Berenholz L, Burkey J, Lippy W. Total ossiculoplasty: advantages of two-point stabilization technique. Int J Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:346260. Dere H, Ozdogan F, Ozcan KM, Selcuk A, Ozcan I, Gokturk G. Comparison of glass ionomer cement and incus interposition in reconstruction of incus long proc