Journals / JAREM / 2018 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Prognostic Effect of Peritoneal Metastasis in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Carcinoma

Metastatik Mide Karsinomlu Hastalarda Periton Metastazı Varlığının Prognostik Etkisi

Journal
JAREM
Pages
83–90
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The effect of peritoneal metastasis on overall survival and progression-free survival was assessed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate of prognosis of the patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis in metastatic gastric carcinoma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Eighty-seven patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2005 and August 2014 were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The effect of peritoneal metastasis on overall survival and progression-free survival was assessed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate of prognosis of the patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis in metastatic gastric carcinoma. Methods: Eighty-seven patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2005 and August 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The effect of peritoneal metastasis on overall survival and progression-free survival was assessed. Results: In univariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (p=0.04), histologic type (p=0.04) and site of metastasis (p=0.02) were significant prognostic factors for overall survival; favoring ECOG performance status 0-1, histopathologically without mucinous component, patients without peritoneal metastasis respectively. Patients with peritoneal metastasis (HR, 1.681; 95% CI, 1.032-2.739; p=0.037) had worse overall survival in multivariate analysis. ECOG PS≥2 predicted inferior PFS in both univariate (8.1months versus 5.5 months, p=0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR, 2.228; 95% CI, 1.397-3.553; p=0.001). Conclusion: The presence of peritoneal metastasis in patients with metastatic gastric carcinoma is associated with significantly shorter overall survival compared to patients without peritoneal metastasis.

Özet

Amaç: Metastatik mide karsinomlu hastalarda periton metastazı varlığının prognozla ilişkisini göstermeyi amaçladık. Yöntemler: Ocak 2005 - Ağustos 2014 tarihleri arasında metastatik mide adenokarsinomu tanısı alan 87 hasta retrospektif olarak tarandı. Periton metastazı varlığının genel sağ kalım ve progresyonsuz sağ kalım ile ilişkisi incelendi. Periton metastazı varlığının diğer klinikopatolojik özelliklerle korelasyonu araştırıldı. Bulgular: Tek değişkenli analizde ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performans durumu 0-1 olan (p=0,04), histopatolojik olarak müsinöz komponent içermeyen (p=0,043) ve periton metastazı olmayan hastaların (p=0,026) genel sağ kalımı istatistiksel olarak anlamlı daha iyiydi. Çok değişkenli analizde, periton metastazı olan hastalar (HR,1,681; %95CI, 1,032-2,739; p=0,037) daha kötü genel sağ kalıma sahipti. Progresyonsuz sağ kalım, ECOG performans durumu ≥2 olan hastalarda hem tek değişkenli (8,1 ay - 5,5 ay, p=0,001) hem de çok değişkenli (HR, 2,228; %95CI, 1,397-3,553; p=0,001) analizde anlamlı olarak daha kötüydü. Sonuç: Periton metastatik mide karsinomlu hastalar, periton metastazı olmayan hastalarla kıyaslandığında, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı daha kötü genel sağ kalım süresine sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRCİ, N. S. (2018). Prognostic Effect of Peritoneal Metastasis in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Carcinoma. JAREM, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 83–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/197629

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2011; 61: 69-90. [CrossRef] Harewood GC. Treatment of gastric cancer. N England J Med 2006; 355: 1386. [CrossRef] Taghavi S, Jayarajan SN, Davey A, Willis AI. Prognostic significance of signet ring gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 3493-8. [CrossRef] Buzzoni R, Bajetta E, Di Bartolomeo M, Miceli R, Beretta E, Ferrario E, et al. Pathological features as predictors of recurrence after radical resection of gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 205-9. [CrossRef] Bando E, Yonemura Y, Takeshita Y, Taniguchi K, Yasui T, Yoshimitsu Y, et al. Intraoperative lavage for cytological examination in 1,297 patients with gastric carcinoma. Am J Surg 1999; 178: 256-62. [CrossRef] D’Angelica M, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Turnbull AD, Bains M, Karpeh MS. Patterns of initial recurrence in completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 808-16. [CrossRef] Ikeguchi M, Oka A, Tsujitani S, Maeta M, Kaibara N. Relationship between area of serosal invasion and intraperitoneal free cancer cells in patients with gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 1994; 14: 2131-4.
  2. Huang J, Zhao Y, Xu Y, Zhu Y, Huang J, Liu Y, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety between oxaliplatin-based and cisplatin-based therapy in advanced gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 34824-31. [CrossRef] Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 215-21. [CrossRef] Wagner AD, Unverzagt S, Grothe W, Kleber G, Grothey A, Haerting J, et al. Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 17: CD004064. [CrossRef] Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 687-97. [CrossRef] Ajani JA, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C, et al. Clinical benefit with docetaxel plus fluorouracil and cisplatin compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil in a phase III trial of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer adenocarcinoma: the V-325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3205-9. [C